| Literature DB >> 23564962 |
Oliver M D Lutz1, Thomas S Hofer, Bernhard R Randolf, Bernd M Rode.
Abstract
The previously investigated La3+-hydrate has been re-evaluated by means of the quantum mechanical charge field (QMCF) molecular dynamics (MD) approach. Improved description of the hydration characteristics has been realised by including the full second hydration shell into the quantum mechanically treated region and by introducing the influence of the surrounding bulk via an electrostatic embedding technique. Analytical tools such as the ligand angular radial distribution analysis have been employed to gain deeper insight into the structural features of the hydrate. La3+ simultaneously forms nona- and decahydrates with capped trigonal and quadratic prismatic structure, besides small amounts of an octahydrate.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23564962 PMCID: PMC3617652 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2012.03.065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Phys Lett ISSN: 0009-2614 Impact factor: 2.328
Figure 1La3+–O and La3+–H RDFs and their running integrations.
Figure 2Local density corrected three-body distribution functions for the first, second and third shell of hydration. Overlay of the O–O pair distribution function for pure water (dashed line) is given for comparison [44].
Hydration sphere radii (rmin,, rmax,) and maximum shell peaks of the La3+-hydrate in Å – all values refer to oxygen.
| Study | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMCF-MD | 2.3 | 3.3 | 3.9 | 6.1 | 2.61 | 4.70 |
| QM/MM-MD | 2.4 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 2.65 | 5.0 |
| MM-MD | 2.0 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 5.4 | 2.66 | 5.0 |
| MM-MD | 2.2 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 5.8 | 2.56 | 4.68 |
| MM-MD | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 2.52 | 4.65 |
| CP-MD | 2.3 | 3.0 | n.a. | n.a. | 2.53 | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 2.58 | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 2.54 | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 2.54 | n.a. |
Minimum (CNmin,) and maximum (CNmax,) coordination numbers and mean coordination numbers (CN) of the La3+-hydrate.
| Study | CNmin,1 | CNmax,1 | CNmin,2 | CNmax,2 | CN1 | CN2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QMCF-MD | 8 | 10 | 19 | 32 | 9.5 | 25.6 |
| QM/MM-MD | 9 | 10 | 18 | 28 | 9.6 | 23.4 |
| MM-MD | 8 | 10 | n.a. | n.a. | 9.1 | 19.1 |
| MM-MD | 8 | 10 | n.a. | n.a. | 8.9 | 15.9 |
| MM-MD | 9 | 10 | n.a. | n.a. | 9.02 | 18.8 |
| CP-MD | 8 | 9 | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 12 | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9 | n.a. |
| EXAFS | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | n.a. | 9.2 | n.a. |
Figure 3O–La3+–O ADF evaluated for the first hydration sphere.
Figure 4La3+–O ARD plots drawn over 3 ps each.
First shell and second shell MRTs and corresponding REX, values obtained for various polarising ions in aqueous solution.
| Ion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (ps) | (ps) | |||
| n.a. | 17.7 | n.a. | 21. 1 | |
| n.a. | 5.5 | n.a. | 6.8 | |
| ⩾240 | 8.4 | 6.0 | 13.2 | |
| 16.6 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 2.3 | |
| n.a. | 6.0 | n.a. | 8.5 | |
| n.a. | 15.4 | n.a. | 10.6 | |
| n.a. | 8.1 | n.a. | 5.9 | |
| 1.7 | n.a. | 11.2 | n.a. |
Comparison of theoretically derived stretching frequencies (top) with experimental results (bottom).
| Ion | ||
|---|---|---|
| (cm−1) | (Nm−1) | |
| Al3+ | 560 | 194 |
| Fe2+ | 357 | 93 |
| Fe3+ | 513 | 193 |
| Zr4+ | 484 | 188 |
| Hf4+ | n.a. | 212 |
| Ir3+ | n.a. | 260 |
| 360 | 110 | |
| Ce3+ | 354 | 106 |
| Ce4+ | 420 | 149 |
| La3+ | 354 | 106 |
| Ce3+ | 359 | 109 |
| Ce4+ | 408 | 141 |
Values have been unscaled prior to comparison [49,50].