AIM: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor currently in a clinical phase III trial for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, has been reported to cause bone loss. The purpose of this study was to test whether, and to what extent, vorinostat influences the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro and bone formation in vivo. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived MSCs were prepared from both normal donors and MM patients. The MSCs were cultured in an osteogenic differentiation induction medium to induce osteogenic differentiation, which was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, Alizarin Red S staining and the mRNA expression of osteogenic markers. Naïve mice were administered vorinostat (100 mg/kg, ip) every other day for 3 weeks. After the mice were sacrificed, bone formation was assessed based on serum osteocalcin level and histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS: Vorinostat inhibited the viability of hMSCs in a concentration-dependent manner (the IC50 value was 15.57 μmol/L). The low concentration of vorinostat (1 μmol/L) did not significantly increase apoptosis in hMSCs, whereas pronounced apoptosis was observed following exposure to higher concentrations of vorinostat (10 and 50 μmol/L). In bone marrow-derived hMSCs from both normal donors and MM patients, vorinostat (1 μmol/L) significantly increased ALP activity, mRNA expression of osteogenic markers, and matrix mineralization. These effects were associated with upregulation of the bone-specifying transcription factor Runx2 and with the epigenetic alterations during normal hMSCs osteogenic differentiation. Importantly, the mice treated with vorinostat did not show any bone loss in response to the optimized treatment regimen. CONCLUSION: Vorinostat, known as a potent anti-myeloma drug, stimulates MSC osteogenesis in vitro. With the optimized treatment regimen, any decrease in bone formation was not observed in vivo.
AIM: Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor currently in a clinical phase III trial for multiple myeloma (MM) patients, has been reported to cause bone loss. The purpose of this study was to test whether, and to what extent, vorinostat influences the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in vitro and bone formation in vivo. METHODS: Bone marrow-derived MSCs were prepared from both normal donors and MMpatients. The MSCs were cultured in an osteogenic differentiation induction medium to induce osteogenic differentiation, which was evaluated by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining, Alizarin Red S staining and the mRNA expression of osteogenic markers. Naïve mice were administered vorinostat (100 mg/kg, ip) every other day for 3 weeks. After the mice were sacrificed, bone formation was assessed based on serum osteocalcin level and histomorphometric analysis. RESULTS:Vorinostat inhibited the viability of hMSCs in a concentration-dependent manner (the IC50 value was 15.57 μmol/L). The low concentration of vorinostat (1 μmol/L) did not significantly increase apoptosis in hMSCs, whereas pronounced apoptosis was observed following exposure to higher concentrations of vorinostat (10 and 50 μmol/L). In bone marrow-derived hMSCs from both normal donors and MMpatients, vorinostat (1 μmol/L) significantly increased ALP activity, mRNA expression of osteogenic markers, and matrix mineralization. These effects were associated with upregulation of the bone-specifying transcription factor Runx2 and with the epigenetic alterations during normal hMSCs osteogenic differentiation. Importantly, the mice treated with vorinostat did not show any bone loss in response to the optimized treatment regimen. CONCLUSION:Vorinostat, known as a potent anti-myeloma drug, stimulates MSC osteogenesis in vitro. With the optimized treatment regimen, any decrease in bone formation was not observed in vivo.
Authors: M Dominici; K Le Blanc; I Mueller; I Slaper-Cortenbach; Fc Marini; Ds Krause; Rj Deans; A Keating; Dj Prockop; Em Horwitz Journal: Cytotherapy Date: 2006 Impact factor: 5.414
Authors: Olle Ringdén; Mehmet Uzunel; Ida Rasmusson; Mats Remberger; Berit Sundberg; Helena Lönnies; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall; Aldona Dlugosz; Attila Szakos; Zuzana Hassan; Brigitta Omazic; Johan Aschan; Lisbeth Barkholt; Katarina Le Blanc Journal: Transplantation Date: 2006-05-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: M S Finnin; J R Donigian; A Cohen; V M Richon; R A Rifkind; P A Marks; R Breslow; N P Pavletich Journal: Nature Date: 1999-09-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lori A Ehrlich; Ho Yeon Chung; Irene Ghobrial; Sun Jin Choi; Francesca Morandi; Simona Colla; Vittorio Rizzoli; G David Roodman; Nicola Giuliani Journal: Blood Date: 2005-05-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Elizabeth W Bradley; Lomeli R Carpio; Andre J van Wijnen; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence; Jennifer J Westendorf Journal: Physiol Rev Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 37.312
Authors: Sabrina Ehnert; Vrinda Sreekumar; Romina H Aspera-Werz; Sahar O Sajadian; Elke Wintermeyer; Gunther H Sandmann; Christian Bahrs; Jan G Hengstler; Patricio Godoy; Andreas K Nussler Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Amel Dudakovic; Emily T Camilleri; Eric A Lewallen; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence; Scott M Riester; Sanjeev Kakar; Martin Montecino; Gary S Stein; Hyun-Mo Ryoo; Allan B Dietz; Jennifer J Westendorf; Andre J van Wijnen Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Christopher R Paradise; M Lizeth Galvan; Eva Kubrova; Sierra Bowden; Esther Liu; Mason F Carstens; Roman Thaler; Gary S Stein; Andre J van Wijnen; Amel Dudakovic Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2019-12-23 Impact factor: 6.384