Literature DB >> 23563869

Indications, contraindications, and complications of mesh in surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

David R Ellington1, Holly E Richter.   

Abstract

Women are seeking care for pelvic organ prolapse in increasing numbers and a significant proportion of them will undergo a second repair for recurrence. This has initiated interest by both surgeons and industry to utilize and design prosthetic mesh materials to help augment longevity of prolapse repairs. Unfortunately, the introduction of transvaginal synthetic mesh kits for use in women was done without the benefit of level 1 data to determine its utility compared with native tissue repair. This report summarizes the potential benefit/risks of transvaginal synthetic mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse and recommendations regarding its continued use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23563869      PMCID: PMC3644007          DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318282f2e8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0009-9201            Impact factor:   2.190


  50 in total

1.  Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse".

Authors:  Miles Murphy; Adam Holzberg; Heather van Raalte; Neeraj Kohli; Howard B Goldman; Vincent Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Perioperative complications and reoperations after incontinence and prolapse surgeries using prosthetic implants.

Authors:  John N Nguyen; Sharon M Jakus-Waldman; Andrew J Walter; Terry White; Shawn A Menefee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Purely transvaginal/perineal management of complications from commercial prolapse kits using a new prostheses/grafts complication classification system.

Authors:  Farzeen Firoozi; Michael S Ingber; Courtenay K Moore; Sandip P Vasavada; Raymond R Rackley; Howard B Goldman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus transvaginal mesh for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Cheryl B Iglesia; Douglass S Hale; Vincent R Lucente
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed transvaginal polypropylene mesh surgery.

Authors:  Corina Schmid; Peter O'Rourke; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Anterior colporrhaphy versus transvaginal mesh for pelvic-organ prolapse.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Tapio Väyrynen; Marie Ellström Engh; Susanne Axelsen; Christian Falconer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A M Weber; M D Walters; M R Piedmonte
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Selection of patients in whom vaginal graft use may be appropriate. Consensus of the 2nd IUGA Grafts Roundtable: optimizing safety and appropriateness of graft use in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  G Willy Davila; Kaven Baessler; Michel Cosson; Linda Cardozo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Incidence and management of graft erosion, wound granulation, and dyspareunia following vaginal prolapse repair with graft materials: a systematic review.

Authors:  Husam Abed; David D Rahn; Lior Lowenstein; Ethan M Balk; Jeffrey L Clemons; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Outcome after transperineal mesh repair of rectocele: a case series.

Authors:  M A Mercer-Jones; A Sprowson; J S Varma
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-04-19       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

1.  A case of renal dysfunction caused by pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ai Miyagi; Yusuke Inaguma; Tomoaki Tokoyoda; Takashi Nakajima; Ryozo Sezaki; Tetsuya Matsukawa
Journal:  CEN Case Rep       Date:  2017-06-20

2.  Transvaginal rectocele repair with human dermal allograft interposition and bilateral sacrospinous fixation with a minimum eight-year follow-up.

Authors:  Serge P Marinkovic; Scott Hughes; Donghua Xie; Lisa M Gillen; Christina M Marinkovic
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.264

3.  Sacrocolpopexy: Patient Outcomes Support the Use of Non-Crosslinked Acellular Dermal Matrix as an Alternative to the Synthetic Polypropylene Mesh.

Authors:  Magdalene Karon; Somu Chatterjee
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2019-12-09

4.  A new technique of laparoscopic fixation of the uterus to the anterior abdominal wall with the use of overfascial mesh in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Jakub Śliwa; Anna Kryza-Ottou; Aleksandra Zimmer-Stelmach; Mariusz Zimmer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  The role of vaginal mesh procedures in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in view of complication risk.

Authors:  David R Ellington; Holly E Richter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2013-08-28

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary management of women with pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms.A clinical and psychological overview.

Authors:  Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Michał Ciebiera; Li-Te Lin; Zaki Sleiman; Tais Marques Cerentini; Patricia Lordelo; Ilker Kahramanoglu; Simone Bruni; Simone Garzon; Michele Fichera
Journal:  Prz Menopauzalny       Date:  2019-11-05

7.  Mesh-augmented transvaginal repair of recurrent or complex anterior pelvic organ prolapse in accordance with the SCENIHR opinion.

Authors:  Gert Naumann; Tanja Hüsch; Claudia Mörgeli; Anna Kolterer; Ralf Tunn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 2.894

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.