Literature DB >> 23562485

Comparing thirty-day outcomes in prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction: a multivariate analysis of 13,082 patients?

Lauren M Mioton1, John T Smetona, Philip J Hanwright, Akhil K Seth, Edward Wang, Karl Y Bilimoria, Jessica Gaido, Neil A Fine, John Y S Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of multi-institutional data that directly compares short term outcomes of autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program provides a unique data platform for evaluating peri-operative outcomes of these two main categories of breast reconstruction. It has detailed data from nearly 250 hospitals and over 13,000 patients. We performed risk-adjusted analysis of prosthetic and autologous breast reconstruction to compare 30-day morbidity outcomes.
METHODS: Patients who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction or autologous tissue reconstruction from 2006 to 2010 were identified using operation descriptions. Over 240 tracked variables were extracted for patients undergoing breast reconstruction. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared, and subgroup analysis was performed on the autologous population to describe outcomes of specific flap procedures. Reconstruction was analyzed as an independent risk factor for specific complications, with propensity scores used to help standardize compared patient populations. Regression analyses were performed using SPSS (version 20.0, Chicago, IL).
RESULTS: A total of 13,082 patients underwent breast reconstruction; 9786 patients received prosthetic reconstruction and 3296 received autologous reconstruction. Within the autologous cohort, 1608 (48.8%) patients underwent a pedicle TRAM flap, 1079 (32.7%) had a LD flap, and 609 (18.5%) received a free flap. Autologous reconstruction patients had higher rates of overall complications (12.47% vs 5.38%, p<.001), wound infection (5.46% vs 3.45%, p<.001), prosthesis/flap failure (3.13% vs 0.85%, p<.001), and reoperation (9.59% vs 6.76%, p<.001). Risk-adjusted multivariate analysis also showed autologous reconstruction to be a significant independent predictor of specific short term outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS: Using risk-adjusted models of a large multi-institutional database, we found that--relative to prosthetic reconstruction--autologous reconstruction had higher rates of 30-day overall complications, wound infection, prosthesis/flap failure, and reoperation. This may be due, in part, to a concomitant increase in operative time and higher case complexity. Taken with other reports such as NMBRA, this study helps to educate patients and surgeons alike on potential, comparative complications during the perioperative period.
Copyright © 2013 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23562485     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  15 in total

1.  Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Mastectomy With and Without Immediate Reconstruction Using Private Insurer Claims Data.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Ida K Fox; Julie A Margenthaler; Kelly E Ball; Daniel Mines; Anna E Wallace; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  A prospective analysis of dynamic loss of breast projection in tissue expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Sumanas W Jordan; John Ys Kim
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05-14

Review 3.  A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Complications Related to Breast Reconstruction Using Different Skin Flaps After Breast Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Jiahua Xing; Ziqi Jia; Yichi Xu; Muzi Chen; Youbai Chen; Yan Han
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 4.  Scoping Review of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Plastic Surgery Research.

Authors:  Haley F M Augustine; Jiayi Hu; Zainab Najarali; Matthew McRae
Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)       Date:  2018-10-21       Impact factor: 0.947

5.  Individualized Risk of Surgical Complications: An Application of the Breast Reconstruction Risk Assessment Score.

Authors:  John Y S Kim; Alexei S Mlodinow; Nima Khavanin; Keith M Hume; Christopher J Simmons; Michael J Weiss; Robert X Murphy; Karol A Gutowski
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2015-06-05

6.  Use of autologous fat grafting for reconstruction postmastectomy and breast conserving surgery: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Tim Goodacre; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Catastrophic Outcomes in Free Tissue Transfer: A Six-Year Review of the NSQIP Database.

Authors:  David W Grant; Alexei Mlodinow; Jon P Ver Halen; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-11-16

8.  The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 30-Day Challenge: Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Reporting Reliability.

Authors:  Austin D Chen; Parisa Kamali; Anmol S Chattha; Alexandra Bucknor; Justin B Cohen; Patrick P Bletsis; Renata Flecha-Hirsch; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee; Samuel J Lin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2018-03-06

9.  Development of a Risk Prediction Model to Individualize Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection After Mastectomy.

Authors:  Margaret A Olsen; Katelin B Nickel; Julie A Margenthaler; Ida K Fox; Kelly E Ball; Daniel Mines; Anna E Wallace; Graham A Colditz; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  A comparative analysis of 2 national breast reconstruction surveys: concerns regarding autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Raffi Gurunluoglu; Michael Bronsert
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2014-06-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.