BACKGROUND: General practice receptionists fulfil an essential role in UK primary care, shaping patient access to health professionals. They are often portrayed as powerful 'gatekeepers'. Existing literature and management initiatives advocate more training to improve their performance and, consequently, the patient experience. AIM: To explore the complexity of the role of general practice receptionists by considering the wider practice context in which they work. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ethnographic observation in seven urban general practices in the north-west of England. METHOD: Seven researchers conducted 200 hours of ethnographic observation, predominantly in the reception areas of each practice. Forty-five receptionists were involved in the study and were asked about their work as they carried out their activities. Observational notes were taken. Analysis involved ascribing codes to incidents considered relevant to the role and organising these into related clusters. RESULTS: Receptionists were faced with the difficult task of prioritising patients, despite having little time, information, and training. They felt responsible for protecting those patients who were most vulnerable, however this was sometimes made difficult by protocols set by the GPs and by patients trying to 'play' the system. CONCLUSION: Framing the receptionist-patient encounter as one between the 'powerful' and the 'vulnerable' gets in the way of fully understanding the complex tasks receptionists perform and the contradictions that are inherent in their role. Calls for more training, without reflective attention to practice dynamics, risk failing to address systemic problems, portraying them instead as individual failings.
BACKGROUND: General practice receptionists fulfil an essential role in UK primary care, shaping patient access to health professionals. They are often portrayed as powerful 'gatekeepers'. Existing literature and management initiatives advocate more training to improve their performance and, consequently, the patient experience. AIM: To explore the complexity of the role of general practice receptionists by considering the wider practice context in which they work. DESIGN AND SETTING: Ethnographic observation in seven urban general practices in the north-west of England. METHOD: Seven researchers conducted 200 hours of ethnographic observation, predominantly in the reception areas of each practice. Forty-five receptionists were involved in the study and were asked about their work as they carried out their activities. Observational notes were taken. Analysis involved ascribing codes to incidents considered relevant to the role and organising these into related clusters. RESULTS: Receptionists were faced with the difficult task of prioritising patients, despite having little time, information, and training. They felt responsible for protecting those patients who were most vulnerable, however this was sometimes made difficult by protocols set by the GPs and by patients trying to 'play' the system. CONCLUSION: Framing the receptionist-patient encounter as one between the 'powerful' and the 'vulnerable' gets in the way of fully understanding the complex tasks receptionists perform and the contradictions that are inherent in their role. Calls for more training, without reflective attention to practice dynamics, risk failing to address systemic problems, portraying them instead as individual failings.
Authors: Christopher Dowrick; Linda Gask; Suzanne Edwards; Saadia Aseem; Peter Bower; Heather Burroughs; Amy Catlin; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Pam Clarke; Mark Gabbay; Simon Gowers; Derek Hibbert; Marija Kovandzic; Jonathan Lamb; Karina Lovell; Anne Rogers; Mari Lloyd-Williams; Waquas Waheed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-12-10 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Melissa Medich; Danielle Rose; Michael McClean; Karin Nelson; Gregory Stewart; David A Ganz; Elizabeth M Yano; Susan E Stockdale Journal: J Ambul Care Manage Date: 2022-08-04
Authors: Inocencio Daniel Maramba; Antoinette Davey; Marc N Elliott; Martin Roberts; Martin Roland; Finlay Brown; Jenni Burt; Olga Boiko; John Campbell Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2015-05-06
Authors: James P Sheppard; Satinder Singh; Janet Jones; Elizabeth Bates; John Skelton; Connie Wiskin; Richard J McManus; Ruth M Mellor Journal: BMC Fam Pract Date: 2014-05-12 Impact factor: 2.497