Literature DB >> 23559873

Analysis of intraprostatic therapeutic effects in prostate cancer patients using [(11)C]-choline pet/ct after external-beam radiation therapy.

J Amanie1, H S Jans, M Wuest, N Pervez, A Murtha, N Usmani, D Yee, R Pearcey, B Danielson, S Patel, R Macewan, C Field, D Robinson, J Wilson, D Lewis, M Parliament, A J B McEwan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of the present study was to analyze, with relatively high sensitivity and specificity, uptake properties of [(11)C]-choline in prostate cancer patients by means of positron-emission tomography (pet)/computed tomography (ct) imaging using objectively defined pet parameters to test for statistically significant changes before, during, and after external-beam radiation therapy (ebrt) and to identify the time points at which the changes occur.
METHODS: The study enrolled 11 patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with ebrt, who were followed for up to 12 months after ebrt. The [(11)C]-choline pet scans were performed before treatment (baseline); at weeks 4 and 8 of ebrt; and at 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months after ebrt.
RESULTS: Analysis of [(11)C]-choline uptake in prostate tissue before treatment resulted in a maximum standardized uptake value (suvmax) of 4.0 ± 0.4 (n = 11) at 40 minutes after injection. During week 8 of ebrt, the suvmax declined to 2.9 ± 0.1 (n = 10, p < 0.05). At 2 and 12 months after ebrt, suvmax values were 2.3 ± 0.3 (n = 10, p < 0.01) and 2.2 ± 0.2 (n = 11, p < 0.001) respectively, indicating that, after ebrt, maximum radiotracer uptake in the prostate was significantly reduced. Similar effects were observed when analyzing the tumour:muscle ratio (tmr). The tmr declined from 7.4 ± 0.6 (n = 11) before ebrt to 6.1 ± 0.4 (n = 11, nonsignificant) during week 8 of ebrt, to 5.6 ± 0.03 (n = 11, p < 0.05) at 2 months after ebrt, and to 4.4 ± 0.4 (n = 11, p < 0.001) at 12 months after ebrt.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that intraprostatic [(11)C]-choline uptake in the 11 analyzed prostate cancer patients significantly declined during and after ebrt. The pet parameters SUVmax and tmr also declined significantly. These effects can be detected during radiation therapy and up to 1 year after therapy. The prognostic value of these early and statistically significant changes in intraprostatic [(11)C]-choline pet avidity during and after ebrt are not yet established. Future studies are indicated to correlate changes in [(11)C]-choline uptake parameters with long-term biochemical recurrence to further evaluate [(11)C]-choline pet changes as a possible, but currently unproven, biomarker of response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  External-beam radiation therapy; [11C]-choline; ebrt; pet; positron-emission tomography

Year:  2013        PMID: 23559873      PMCID: PMC3615852          DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  32 in total

1.  18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients.

Authors:  Mohsen Beheshti; Larisa Imamovic; Gabriele Broinger; Reza Vali; Peter Waldenberger; Franz Stoiber; Michael Nader; Bernhard Gruy; Guenter Janetschek; Werner Langsteger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Planning in the IGRT context: closing the loop.

Authors:  Gig S Mageras; James Mechalakos
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.934

3.  11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer: detection of recurrent disease at PSA relapse.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Oyama; Tom R Miller; Farrokh Dehdashti; Barry A Siegel; Keith C Fischer; Jeff M Michalski; Adam S Kibel; Gerald L Andriole; Joel Picus; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is useless for the detection of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Hofer; C Laubenbacher; T Block; J Breul; R Hartung; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  Role of imaging and biopsy to assess local recurrence after definitive treatment for prostate carcinoma (surgery, radiotherapy, cryotherapy, HIFU).

Authors:  Pasquale Martino; Vincenzo Scattoni; Andrea B Galosi; Paolo Consonni; Carlo Trombetta; Silvano Palazzo; Carmen Maccagnano; Giovanni Liguori; Massimo Valentino; Michele Battaglia; Libero Barozzi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Clinical evidence on PET/CT for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maria Picchio; Elisabetta Giovannini; Cinzia Crivellaro; Luigi Gianolli; Nadia di Muzio; Cristina Messa
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.280

7.  Experience with carbon-11 choline positron emission tomography in prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  J Kotzerke; J Prang; B Neumaier; B Volkmer; A Guhlmann; K Kleinschmidt; R Hautmann; S N Reske
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  2000-09

8.  18F-fluoroacetate: a potential acetate analog for prostate tumor imaging--in vivo evaluation of 18F-fluoroacetate versus 11C-acetate.

Authors:  Datta E Ponde; Carmen S Dence; Nobuyuki Oyama; Joonyoung Kim; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Richard Laforest; Barry A Siegel; Michael J Welch
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

Authors:  B J Krause; M Souvatzoglou; M Tuncel; K Herrmann; A K Buck; C Praus; T Schuster; H Geinitz; U Treiber; M Schwaiger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  [18F]fluorocholine PET/CT imaging for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer at PSA relapse: experience in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marino Cimitan; Roberto Bortolus; Sandro Morassut; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Antonio Garbeglio; Tanja Baresic; Eugenio Borsatti; Annalisa Drigo; Mauro G Trovò
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Positron emission tomography in imaging evaluation of staging, restaging, treatment response, and prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2016-05

Review 2.  Molecular imaging of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Marie Boustani; Darko Pucar; Lawrence Saperstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Positron Emission Tomography Imaging of Tumor Cell Metabolism and Application to Therapy Response Monitoring.

Authors:  Amarnath Challapalli; Eric O Aboagye
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 6.244

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.