Literature DB >> 23558909

Goal-directed intraoperative fluid therapy guided by stroke volume and its variation in high-risk surgical patients: a prospective randomized multicentre study.

Thomas W L Scheeren1, Christoph Wiesenack, Herwig Gerlach, Gernot Marx.   

Abstract

Perioperative hemodynamic optimisation improves postoperative outcome for patients undergoing high-risk surgery (HRS). In this prospective randomized multicentre study we studied the effects of an individualized, goal-directed fluid management based on continuous stroke volume variation (SVV) and stroke volume (SV) monitoring on postoperative outcomes. 64 patients undergoing HRS were randomized either to a control group (CON, n = 32) or a goal-directed group (GDT, n = 32). In GDT, SVV and SV were continuously monitored (FloTrac/Vigileo) and patients were brought to and maintained on the plateau of the Frank-Starling curve (SVV <10 % and SV increase <10 % in response to fluid loading). Organ dysfunction was assessed using the SOFA score and resource utilization using the TISS score. Patients were followed up to 28 days for postoperative complications. Main outcome measures were the number of complications (infectious, cardiac, respiratory, renal, hematologic and abdominal post-operative complications), maximum SOFA score and cumulative TISS score during ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, and time until fit for discharge. 12 patients had to be excluded from final analysis (6 in each group). During surgery, GDT received more colloids than CON (1,589 vs. 927 ml, P < 0.05) and SVV decreased in GDT (from 9.0 to 8.0 %, P < 0.05) but not in CON. The number of postoperative wound infections was lower in GDT (0 vs. 7, P < 0.01). Although not statistically significant, the proportion of patients with at least one complication (46 vs. 62 %), the number of postoperative complications per patient (0.65 vs. 1.40), the maximum sofa score (5.9 vs. 7.2), and the cumulative TISS score (69 vs. 83) tended to be lower. This multicentre study shows that fluid management based on a SVV and SV optimisation protocol is feasible and decreases postoperative wound infections. Our findings also suggest that a goal-directed strategy might decrease postoperative organ dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558909     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9461-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  47 in total

Review 1.  Pathophysiology and clinical implications of perioperative fluid excess.

Authors:  K Holte; N E Sharrock; H Kehlet
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  A randomized, controlled trial of the use of pulmonary-artery catheters in high-risk surgical patients.

Authors:  James Dean Sandham; Russell Douglas Hull; Rollin Frederick Brant; Linda Knox; Graham Frederick Pineo; Christopher J Doig; Denny P Laporta; Sidney Viner; Louise Passerini; Hugh Devitt; Ann Kirby; Michael Jacka
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Preoperative optimization of the high-risk surgical patient.

Authors:  S J Davies; R J T Wilson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Perioperative cardiovascular mortality in noncardiac surgery: validation of the Lee cardiac risk index.

Authors:  Eric Boersma; Miklos D Kertai; Olaf Schouten; Jeroen J Bax; Peter Noordzij; Ewout W Steyerberg; Arend F L Schinkel; Marian van Santen; Maarten L Simoons; Ian R Thomson; Jan Klein; Hero van Urk; Don Poldermans
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Why is the surgical high-risk patient still at risk?

Authors:  H Kehlet; M Mythen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  A prospective randomized trial of preoperative "optimization" of cardiac function in patients undergoing elective peripheral vascular surgery.

Authors:  D W Ziegler; J G Wright; P S Choban; L Flancbaum
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Sarah Heenen; Michael Piagnerelli; Marc Koch; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery.

Authors:  Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Highs and lows in high-risk surgery: the controversy of goal-directed haemodynamic management.

Authors:  Jukka Takala
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-11-22       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure.

Authors:  Didier Payen; Anne Cornélie de Pont; Yasser Sakr; Claudia Spies; Konrad Reinhart; Jean Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  47 in total

1.  Implementation of goal-directed therapy needs a boost, and it is called assisted fluid management.

Authors:  Paul A van Beest
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Association of conflicts of interest with the results and conclusions of goal-directed hemodynamic therapy research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Feng Dai; Alexandria Brackett; Yuhang Ai; Lingzhong Meng
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  When is enough enough? Individualized goal-directed fluid therapy for surgery.

Authors:  Niels H Secher
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Effective evaluation of arterial pulse waveform analysis by two-dimensional stroke volume variation-stroke volume index plots.

Authors:  Teiji Sawa; Mao Kinoshita; Atsushi Kainuma; Koichi Akiyama; Yoshifumi Naito; Hideya Kato; Fumimasa Amaya; Keiji Shigemi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Less invasive hemodynamic monitoring in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Teboul; Bernd Saugel; Maurizio Cecconi; Daniel De Backer; Christoph K Hofer; Xavier Monnet; Azriel Perel; Michael R Pinsky; Daniel A Reuter; Andrew Rhodes; Pierre Squara; Jean-Louis Vincent; Thomas W Scheeren
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-05-07       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The challenge of exploring organ function: knowledge is not care, but care needs knowledge!

Authors:  Jean Paul Viale; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 7.  Using what you get: dynamic physiologic signatures of critical illness.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 8.  Applied physiology at the bedside to drive resuscitation algorithms.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Michael R Pinsky
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 9.  Colorectal Surgery in Critically Unwell Patients: A Multidisciplinary Approach.

Authors:  Ashwin Subramaniam; Robert Wengritzky; Stewart Skinner; Kiran Shekar
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-09

10.  Perioperative outcomes of goal-directed versus conventional fluid therapy in radical cystectomy with enhanced recovery protocol.

Authors:  Alireza Ghoreifi; Michael F Basin; Saum Ghodoussipour; Soroush T Bazargani; Erfan Amini; Mohammad Aslzare; Jie Cai; Gus Miranda; Shihab Sugeir; Sumeet Bhanvadia; Anne K Schuckman; Siamak Daneshmand; Philip Lumb; Hooman Djaladat
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.