The N-acylhydrazone (NAH) analogues N-methyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-785) and N-benzyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-786) were prepared from 2-thienylidene 3,4-methylenedioxybenzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-294). The ability of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 to decrease central nervous system activity was investigated in male Swiss mice. LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 (30 mg/kg, ip) reduced locomotor activity from 209 ± 26 (control) to 140 ± 18 (P < 0.05) or 146 ± 15 crossings/min (P < 0.05), respectively. LASSBio-785 (15 or 30 mg/kg, iv) also reduced locomotor activity from 200 ± 15 to 116 ± 29 (P < 0.05) or 60 ± 16 crossings/min (P < 0.01), respectively. Likewise, LASSBio-786 (15 or 30 mg/kg, iv) reduced locomotor activity from 200 ± 15 to 127 ± 10 (P < 0.01) or 96 ± 14 crossings/min (P < 0.01), respectively. Pretreatment with flumazenil (20 mg/kg, ip) prevented the locomotor impairment induced by NAH analogues (15 mg/kg, iv), providing evidence that the benzodiazepine (BDZ) receptor is involved. This finding was supported by the structural similarity of NAH analogues to midazolam. However, LASSBio-785 showed weak binding to the BDZ receptor. LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 (30 mg/kg, ip, n = 10) increased pentobarbital-induced sleeping time from 42 ± 5 (DMSO) to 66 ± 6 (P < 0.05) or 75 ± 4 min (P < 0.05), respectively. The dose required to achieve 50% hypnosis (HD50) following iv injection of LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 was 15.8 or 9.5 mg/kg, respectively. These data suggest that both NAH analogues might be useful for the development of new neuroactive drugs for the treatment of insomnia or for use in conjunction with general anesthesia.
The N-acylhydrazone (NAH) analogues N-methyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-785) and N-benzyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-786) were prepared from 2-thienylidene 3,4-methylenedioxybenzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-294). The ability of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 to decrease central nervous system activity was investigated in male Swiss mice. LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 (30 mg/kg, ip) reduced locomotor activity from 209 ± 26 (control) to 140 ± 18 (P < 0.05) or 146 ± 15 crossings/min (P < 0.05), respectively. LASSBio-785 (15 or 30 mg/kg, iv) also reduced locomotor activity from 200 ± 15 to 116 ± 29 (P < 0.05) or 60 ± 16 crossings/min (P < 0.01), respectively. Likewise, LASSBio-786 (15 or 30 mg/kg, iv) reduced locomotor activity from 200 ± 15 to 127 ± 10 (P < 0.01) or 96 ± 14 crossings/min (P < 0.01), respectively. Pretreatment with flumazenil (20 mg/kg, ip) prevented the locomotor impairment induced by NAH analogues (15 mg/kg, iv), providing evidence that the benzodiazepine (BDZ) receptor is involved. This finding was supported by the structural similarity of NAH analogues to midazolam. However, LASSBio-785 showed weak binding to the BDZ receptor. LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 (30 mg/kg, ip, n = 10) increased pentobarbital-induced sleeping time from 42 ± 5 (DMSO) to 66 ± 6 (P < 0.05) or 75 ± 4 min (P < 0.05), respectively. The dose required to achieve 50% hypnosis (HD50) following iv injection of LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 was 15.8 or 9.5 mg/kg, respectively. These data suggest that both NAH analogues might be useful for the development of new neuroactive drugs for the treatment of insomnia or for use in conjunction with general anesthesia.
During an ongoing research program aimed at developing novel treatments for
cardiovascular disorders, novel N-acylhydrazone (NAH) compounds
based on 2-thienylidene 3,4-methylenedioxybenzoylhydrazine (LASSBio-294) were
synthesized. LASSBio-294 was synthesized from safrole 1,2, an abundant
Brazilian natural product obtained from Ocotea pretiosa
3. LASSBio-294 was prepared as a bioactive
6-aryl-4,5-heterocyclic-fused pyridazinone compound, part of a family of compounds
known as potent and selective phosphodiesterase inhibitors 4, and its cardiac inotropic properties were evaluated.
LASSBio-294 exhibited significant positive cardiac inotropic activity due to
increased calcium accumulation in the sarcoplasmic reticulum 5. Additionally, LASSBio-294 induced the relaxation of aortic
rings, an effect mediated by the guanylate cyclase/cyclic guanylate monophosphate
pathway 6.In order to identify new drug candidates with enhanced vasodilatory properties and
decreased side effects, two novel analogues of LASSBio-294 were synthesized by the
introduction of a methyl and a benzyl group in the amidenitrogen of the NAH moiety,
to yield LASSBio-785 (N-methyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine) and LASSBio-786
(N-benzyl 2-thienylidene 3,4-benzoylhydrazine), respectively. LASSBio-785 exhibited
improved vasodilator properties (IC50: 10.2 ± 0.5 µM) and was seven times
more potent than LASSBio-294 (74 µM) in aortic rings pre-contracted with
phenylephrine 7, and both derivatives were
recently shown to inhibit platelet aggregation 8. While investigating the hemodynamic effect of LASSBio-785 in rats, we
noted that the animals fell asleep, an effect not observed with the LASSBio-294
prototype compound. Therefore, the current study was designed to investigate the
sedative-hypnotic pharmacological properties of LASSBio-785 and the more
lipid-soluble LASSBio-786. We also investigated the involvement of the GABAergic
system in the sedative-hypnotic activities of both compounds.
Material and Methods
Animals
Male Swiss mice (20-25 g) were housed in a temperature- (24 ± 1°C) and
humidity-controlled (60%) room with a 12-h light/dark cycle. The mice were fed a
standard diet with water ad libitum. Housing, handling and
experimental procedures were in compliance with the recommendations of the
Animal Care and Use Committee of Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
(protocol #DFBCICB013). The animals were randomly assigned to a single-treatment
group and were used only once.
Drugs
Midazolam, sodium pentobarbital and flumazenil were generously donated by
Cristália Produtos Químicos e Farmac#xEA;uticos (Brazil). LASSBio-785 and
LASSBio-786 were generously donated by Laboratório de Avaliação e Síntese de
Substâncias Bioativas (LASSBio, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil).
All compounds were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), except for midazolam,
which was dissolved in distilled water, and pentobarbital sodium, which was
dissolved in propylene glycol and distilled water.
Methods
Assessment of locomotor activity in mice
Spontaneous locomotor activity was measured in an open field (45 × 45 cm, LE
8811, Panlab, USA) in which 16 infrared photocells were positioned every 2.5 cm.
The mice were placed individually in the center of the chamber. The sedative
properties of midazolam, LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 were compared using
locomotor activity as an index of sedation 9. Locomotor activity was quantified as the number of beam
interruptions (crossings) registered by a computer, and data are reported as the
number of crossings per minute (crossings/min). After ip or
iv injection of vehicle (DMSO), midazolam (2 mg/kg),
LASSBio-785 (15 or 30 mg/kg), or LASSBio-786 (15 or 30 mg/kg), locomotor
activity was recorded cumulatively over a 40-min session, divided into 8 5-min
periods. The doses of derivatives were selected on the basis of preliminary
tests with LASSBio-785 (data not shown). Each treatment group consisted of 10
mice. The same positive (midazolam) and negative (vehicle) control groups were
used to analyze the effects of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 on locomotor
activity.In another set of experiments, in order to investigate the mechanism involved in
the sedative activity of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786, the mice were pretreated
with a specific antagonist of the benzodiazepine receptor on the
GABAA receptor complex (flumazenil, 20 mg/kg,
ip) 15 min before the administration of LASSBio-785 or
LASSBio-786 (15 mg/kg, iv) 10.
Assessment of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time in mice
Mice were gently positioned in a restraining tube, and sodium pentobarbital
(30 mg/kg) was injected intravenously into the tail vein. The time from the loss
of the up-righting reflex to its recovery was recorded as the sleeping time.
Three consecutive trials up to recovery of this reflex were used to determine
the hypnosis endpoint 11. To investigate
the hypnotic activity, LASSBio-785 (15 or 30 mg/kg, ip) or
LASSBio-786 (15 or 30 mg/kg, ip) was injected 15 min before
sodium pentobarbital and the sleeping time was determined as before. Injection
of midazolam (2 mg/kg, ip) 15 min before sodium pentobarbital
(30 mg/kg, iv) was used as a positive control. Another control
group received DMSO (ip) 15 min before sodium pentobarbital
administration.
Assessment of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 hypnotic activity in mice
Mice were injected intravenously with LASSBio-785 (10, 15, 20, and 25 mg/kg) or
LASSBio-786 (5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg) in order to determine the HD50
for the hypnotic activity of the compounds based on loss of the righting reflex.
Groups of 10 animals were used for each dose. Solutions were prepared
immediately before the test. Logarithmic dose-response curves for LASSBio-785
and LASSBio-786 were fitted to calculate the HD50 using a linear
regression analysis.
Root mean square (RMS) analysis
The structural similarities of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 to the benzodiazepine
(BDZ) drug midazolam were first estimated using the BioMedCAChe 6.0 software.
The most stable synperiplanar structural conformers (12) were then superimposed
on the corresponding BDZ scaffolds, thus aligning the central NAH framework. The
RMS of midazolam was then calculated to enable evaluation of the
structure-activity relationships between BDZ and the novel analogues,
LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786. The closer to zero the RMS values are, the higher
the structural correlation between them.
Binding assay
A binding assay was performed between LASSBio-785 and the BDZ receptor site (13)
or the GABA-gated Cl-channel of the GABAA receptor complex (14) of
the rat cerebral cortex using a single concentration (50 µM).
[3H]-flunitrazepam (0.4 nM) and [35S]-TBPS (3 nM) were
used as the BDZ agonist radioligand and the Cl-channel GABA-gated antagonist
radioligand, respectively. Data are reported as percent inhibition of specific
binding afforded by LASSBio-785 relative to control, using the equation: %
inhibition = 100 - [(measured specific binding / control specific binding) x
100].
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as means ± SE. The Student t-test was used to
compare the differences between the positive control and vehicle groups at the
same time. Comparisons between vehicle (control) and treatment groups were
analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Dunnett
multiple comparison test. Differences with P < 0.05 were considered to be
statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using the
GraphPad Prism® 4.0 software (USA).
Results
Effects of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 on the locomotor activity of
mice
The potential sedative activity of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 at doses of 15 and
30 mg/kg (ip and iv) was evaluated based on
measurements of spontaneous locomotor activity of mice in an open field. Figure 1A shows that ip
administration of LASSBio-785 at 15 mg/kg did not significantly reduce the
locomotor activity relative to DMSO-treated control mice. However, at a higher
dose of LASSBio-785 (30 mg/kg), locomotor activity was reduced 30%. Midazolam
(2 mg/kg, ip), which was used as a BDZ-like positive control,
significantly reduced locomotor activity 45%. Intraperitoneal administration of
LASSBio-786 at 15 and 30 mg/kg also reduced locomotor activity 29 and 30%,
respectively (Figure 1B).
Figure 1
Effect of midazolam and two new N-acylhydrazone
compounds on locomotor activity of mice. LASSBio-785
(A) and LASSBio-786 (B) were injected
(15 and 30 mg/kg, ip), and locomotor activity was determined in an open
field test during a 40-min period. Data are reported as means ± SE (n =
10). *P < 0.05 compared to DMSO (Dunnett multiple comparison
test).
When injected intravenously at 15 and 30 mg/kg, LASSBio-785 decreased locomotor
activity from 200 ± 15 (DMSO, n = 10) to 116 ± 29 (P < 0.05, n = 10) and 60 ±
16 crossings/min (P < 0.01, n = 10), respectively. Midazolam treatment
(2 mg/kg, iv) reduced locomotor activity to 120 ± 19
crossings/min (P < 0.01, n = 10). The same effect was observed after
iv administration of 15 and 30 mg/kg LASSBio-786, when
locomotor activity decreased to 127 ± 10 (P < 0.01, n = 10) and 96 ± 14
crossings/min (P < 0.01, n = 10), respectively.The involvement of the BDZ pathway was investigated by examining the influence of
pretreatment with flumazenil (20 mg/kg, ip) on the sedative
properties of LASSBio-785 (15 mg/kg, iv) and LASSBio-786
(15 mg/kg, iv). Flumazenil did not significantly reduce
locomotor activity when compared to the vehicle-pretreated group (170 ± 19 and
209 ± 26 crossings/min, respectively, n = 10). Locomotor activity following
LASSBio-785 administration to vehicle- or flumazenil-pretreated mice was 116 ±
29 and 186 ± 5 crossings/min (P < 0.05, n = 10), respectively. Likewise,
flumazenil pretreatment also attenuated the depression of locomotor activity
induced by LASSBio-786 (from 127 ± 10 to 174 ± 9 crossings/min, P < 0.05, n =
10).
Effects on pentobarbital-induced sleeping time in mice
Intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital (30 mg/kg) to DMSO-treated
(ip) control mice induced sleeping time of 42 ± 5 min
(Figure 2). Sleeping time was
increased in mice pretreated with midazolam (2 mg/kg, ip).
Administration of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 at 15 mg/kg (ip)
did not alter sodium pentobarbital-induced sleeping time significantly, but at
30 mg/kg these compounds prolonged sleeping time (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Effects of midazolam (2 mg/kg, ip), LASSBio-785 (15
and 30 mg/kg, ip) and LASSBio-786 (15 and 30 mg/kg,
ip) on the duration of sodium pentobarbital-induced
sleeping time. Data are reported as means ± SE (n = 10). *P < 0.05
compared to DMSO (Dunnett multiple comparison test).
Effects on the hypnotic activity in mice
Intravenous injections of 10, 15, 20, and 25 mg/kg LASSBio-785 induced loss of
the righting reflex 20, 40, 70, and 90% of each group, respectively. In mice
similarly treated with LASSBio-786 at 5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/kg, the reflex loss
was 20, 60, 70, and 80%, respectively. The HD50 values for
LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786, calculated from the log dose-response curves, were
15.8 and 9.5 mg/kg, respectively (Figure
3).
Figure 3
Incidence of hypnosis induced in mice by iv
administration of different doses of (A) LASSBio-785
(10, 15, 20, 25 mg/kg, iv) or (B)
LASSBio-786 (5, 10, 15, 20 mg/kg, iv). Simple linear
regression (γ = α + βx) of the log dose-response curves was used to
calculate the dose causing 50% hypnosis (HD50). Each point
represents the percentage of subjects presenting hypnosis in the group
(n = 10).
Superimposition of NAH derivatives and BDZ compounds
Figure 4 shows the occurrence of
significant structural correlations in pharmacologically relevant regions
between the N-alkyl NAH derivatives and the BDZ drug midazolam. The RMS values
calculated after superimposing the structures of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 on
that of midazolam were 0.358 and 0.378, respectively.
Figure 4
Structural correlation between the N-acylhydrazone
(NAH) derivatives LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 and the benzodiazepine
compound midazolam. The atoms were colored as follows: carbon (gray),
hydrogen (white), oxygen (red), and nitrogen (blue). The circles
indicate the atoms used for the alignment of the structures.
A, Chemical structures of LASSBio-785 (1),
LASSBio-786 (2), and midazolam (3). B, Superimposition
of compounds 1 vs 3 (yellow structure) and 2
vs 3 (yellow structure), aligned by the central NAH
framework.
In rat cerebral cortex membranes, LASSBio-785 (50 µM) inhibited binding of the
antagonist [3H]-flunitrazepam (0.4 nM) to BDZ receptors by 14.2 and
8% (average 11.1%, n = 2) and of the antagonist [35S]-TBPS (3 nM) to
Cl-channel GABAA-gated receptors by 11.2 and 17.6% (average 14.4%, n
= 2). LASSBio-786 was not tested in these assays.
Discussion
The main finding of the current study was that LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786, which
respectively have a methyl or benzyl group linked to the amidenitrogen unit of the
NAH moiety of LASSBio-294, a cardiac ionotropic 5 and vasodilator compound 6,
significantly reduced the locomotor activity of mice measured in an open-field, a
protocol that has been used to efficiently monitor the sedative effect of drugs
15. In addition, the effects of both
derivatives were sensitive to inhibition by pretreatment with the BDZ receptor
antagonist flumazenil and were accompanied by prolongation of the hypnotic effects
of pentobarbital-induced sleeping time, but no anxiolytic-like effects were detected
with either derivative in the elevated plus-maze test.Inhibition of neuronal excitability by the neurotransmitter GABA is mainly the result
of activation of GABAA receptors, pentameric ligand-gated chloride
channels which, via enhanced chloride influx, induce hyperpolarization and reduce
firing of action potentials 16. These
inhibitory effects of GABA are facilitated by BDZ agonists, which act allosterically
on the GABAA receptor complex to enhance affinity of the GABA binding
site to the neurotransmitter, and it is estimated that 20-30% of the inhibitory
neurons in the CNS are GABAergic. There is a wide diversity of GABAA
receptor subtypes, and those most highly expressed in the CNS include the α1βγ2,
α2βγ2, α3βγ2, and α5βγ2 isoforms. Previous studies have reported that α1-containing
GABAA receptors mediate the sedative, addictive, anterograde amnesic,
and part of the anticonvulsant activities of the BDZ diazepam, whereas the
α2-containing isoform is the main mediator of its anxiolytic-like effects and also
promotes part of its myorelaxant actions, alongside the α3- and α5-containing
isoforms 17. The α5-containing
GABAA receptors have also been linked to the development of tolerance
to the sedative effects of BDZ 17.LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 could facilitate GABAergic inhibition via interactions
with the GABAA receptor complex. This hypothesis is supported by the
finding that the sedative effects of both compounds were reversed by the BDZ
receptor antagonist flumazenil. This view is strengthened by the evidence for
structural correlation observed by in silico superimposition of the
pharmacophoric points of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 with the BDZ drug midazolam, as
detected by the determination of RMS. Despite these findings, preliminary binding
analyses using a single concentration of LASSBio-785 have shown only weak
interactions between this compound and the BDZ-binding site. Even if a more detailed
investigation regarding characterization of the LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 binding
sites on the GABAA receptor complex is still warranted, it is important
to highlight that some currently available sedatives, which are active at
α1-containing GABAA receptors, such as zolpidem and zopiclone, do not
share structural similarity with BDZs 18.The insertion of methyl and benzyl groups in the NAH subunit of LASSBio-785 and
LASSBio-786 is associated with the synperiplanar conformation of both compounds,
whereby the amidehydrogen is synperiplanar to the carbonyl oxygen 12. The present study shows that this folded
structure can play an important role in the central depressor activity of these
substances.In contrast to barbiturates, BDZ-like compounds do not directly open the chloride
channel 17. Preliminary binding assays with
LASSBio-785 (50 µM) have shown moderate displacement (average 14.4%) of the
antagonist [35S]-TBPS from its specific binding sites on the chloride
channel of GABAA receptors, suggesting that it may act as an agonist at
this target. Thus, the effects of LASSBio-785 (and possibly LASSBio-786) on GABA
receptors of the CNS may be associated with both an indirect activation via binding
to the BDZ receptor and a direct stimulatory effect on the chloride channel. These
mechanisms could explain the increased duration of hypnosis induced by pentobarbital
following LASSBio-785 or LASSBio-786 administration.On the other hand, LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 were more potent in reducing locomotor
activity when given iv as compared to the ip
route. The less intense sedative effects seen following ip
administration could be due to poor absorption into the blood stream or to
significant liver metabolism. These aspects, as well as the bioavailability of both
derivatives following oral administration, remain to be assessed. Moreover, even if
LASSBio-786 was deliberately planned to display greater lipid solubility than
LASSBio-785 (lipid solubility ClogP values of 3.85 ± 0.62 and 2.09 ± 0.61,
respectively) to favor its transfer across the blood-brain barrier, both compounds
were equipotent in promoting sedation following iv injection.In addition to their sedative effects, classical BDZ-like compounds can also promote
anticonvulsant and anxiolytic-like effects. The possibility that LASSBio-785 and
LASSBio-786 could display similar properties was also tested, but the results were
negative. At 5 mg/kg, iv, neither derivative protected mice from
seizures induced by pentylenetetrazole (10 or 15 mg/kg, ip) or
promoted anxiolytic-like behaviors in mice submitted to the elevated plus-maze test
(data not shown).Drug-induced impairment of locomotor activity may be affected by several
physiological conditions, including hypotension, pain and muscle relaxation.
Although blood pressure was not measured in the current study, rats given
iv LASSBio-785 infusion at
7.5 mg.kg-1.min-1 for 10 min displayed decreases of
approximately 30% in diastolic (but not systolic or mean) blood pressure and heart
rate over the last 3 min, whereas no such changes were detected following similar
infusion of LASSBio-786 (19). Such findings suggest that the locomotor impairment
induced by LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 was not a consequence of hypotension.
Furthermore, since LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 can each reduce carrageenan-induced
hind paw thermal hyperalgesia (data not shown), it appears unlikely that inhibition
of locomotor activity is due to nociceptive effects of these derivatives. In
addition, we also observed that the sedative effects of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786
were not affected by ip pretreatment with either the
α-2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine (5 mg/kg) or the opioid receptor antagonist
naloxone (1 mg/kg) (data not shown). Finally, as LASSBio-785 administration
(30 mg/kg, ip) did not modify the performance of mice in the
rotarod test (data not shown), the inhibition of locomotor activity afforded by this
dose of the derivative is unrelated to effects on motor coordination per
se.The therapeutic use of currently available hypnotic drugs is limited by the onset of
side effects including risk of addiction and hemodynamic and respiratory depression
17,20. Even if the available reports on the effects of LASSBio-785 and
LASSBio-786 show limited (if any) effects on blood pressure, muscle relaxation or
impairment of muscular coordination, more studies are needed to compare the
toxicological profiles of these compounds with those of hypnotics currently in use
in clinical practice.It is interesting to note that the HD50 values for the hypnotic effects of
LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 were similar, yet the former derivative is 10-fold less
potent than the latter in relaxing isolated arterial vessel rings 7. This difference in the relative potencies of
LASSBio-786 and LASSBio-785 in promoting hypnosis and vasodilatation suggests that
both effects are the result of actions on distinct targets, and that the CNS effects
reported herein are unrelated to modulation of the NO-GMPc system.Another possible use of LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 is as adjuvant drugs in
anesthesia. Midazolam and dexmedetomidine have been used successfully to potentiate
intravenous and inhalation general anesthetics. The associated increase in
pentobarbital-induced sleeping time and the hypnotic effect induced by single-bolus
administration indicate that LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786 may be useful for this
purpose.Two new N-acylhydrazone derivatives of the cardio-inotropic
prototype drug LASSBio-294, named LASSBio-785 and LASSBio-786, exhibited sedative
and hypnotic properties in mice, which could be potentially relevant towards the
development of new neuroactive drugs for the treatment of insomnia and in
conjunction with general anesthesia.
Authors: S Mora; G Diaz-Veliz; H Lungenstrass; M García-González; T Coto-Morales; C Poletti; T C M De Lima; M Herrera-Ruiz; J Tortoriello Journal: J Ethnopharmacol Date: 2004-12-25 Impact factor: 4.360
Authors: Alexandre G Silva; Gisele Zapata-Sudo; Arthur E Kummerle; Carlos A M Fraga; Eliezer J Barreiro; Roberto T Sudo Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: V Dal Piaz; M P Giovannoni; C Castellana; J M Palacios; J Beleta; T Doménech; V Segarra Journal: J Med Chem Date: 1997-05-09 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Ricardo Menegatti; Gilberto M S Silva; Gisele Zapata-Sudo; Juliana M Raimundo; Roberto T Sudo; Eliezer J Barreiro; Carlos A M Fraga Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: P C Lima; L M Lima; K C da Silva; P H Léda; A L de Miranda; C A Fraga; E J Barreiro Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Fernanda C F Brito; Arthur E Kummerle; Claire Lugnier; Carlos A M Fraga; Eliezer J Barreiro; Ana L P Miranda Journal: Eur J Pharmacol Date: 2010-04-20 Impact factor: 4.432
Authors: Arthur E Kümmerle; Juliana M Raimundo; Carla M Leal; Givanildo S da Silva; Tatiane L Balliano; Mariano A Pereira; Carlos A de Simone; Roberto T Sudo; Gisele Zapata-Sudo; Carlos A M Fraga; Eliezer J Barreiro Journal: Eur J Med Chem Date: 2009-05-08 Impact factor: 6.514
Authors: Roberto T Sudo; Kenichiro Hayashida; Aluizio N Santos; Masahito Kawatani; Carlos Es Monteiro; Roberto D Moreira; Margarete M Trachez; Guilherme C Montes; Gisele Zapata-Sudo Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2018-10-30 Impact factor: 3.133