Literature DB >> 23558620

Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get.

Mohammed Toseef Ansari, David Moher.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558620     DOI: 10.1038/nm.3151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

Authors:  David Moher; Alexander Tsertsvadze
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-03-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  (Meta)analyze this: Systematic reviews might lose credibility.

Authors:  Peter Humaidan; Nikolaos P Polyzos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

Authors:  David Moher; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Andrea C Tricco; Margaret Sampson; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies.

Authors:  Joanne Yaffe; Paul Montgomery; Sally Hopewell; Lindsay Dianne Shepard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.