Literature DB >> 16546523

Systematic reviews: when is an update an update?

David Moher1, Alexander Tsertsvadze.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16546523     DOI： 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68358-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN： 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


× No keyword cloud information.
  23 in total

1.  Motivating authors to update systematic reviews: practical strategies from a behavioural science perspective.

Authors:  Ann-Margret Ervin
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Analysis of the reporting of search strategies in Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Adriana Yoshii; Daphne A Plaut; Kathleen A McGraw; Margaret J Anderson; Kay E Wellik
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-01

3.  Systematic reviews deserve more credit than they get.

Authors:  Mohammed Toseef Ansari; David Moher
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  V C H Chung; X Y Wu; Y Feng; R S T Ho; S Y S Wong; D Threapleton
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 6.892

5.  Updating systematic reviews: an international survey.

Authors:  Chantelle Garritty; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Andrea C Tricco; Margaret Sampson; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  When and how to update systematic reviews.

Authors:  D Moher; A Tsertsvadze; A C Tricco; M Eccles; J Grimshaw; M Sampson; N Barrowman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

7.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

8.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  How good is the orthopaedic literature?

Authors:  Harman Chaudhry; Raman Mundi; Ishu Singh; Thomas A Einhorn; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Characteristics and Methodological Quality of Meta-Analyses on Hypertension Treatments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Xin Yin Wu; Xin Jian Du; Robin S T Ho; Clarence C Y Lee; Benjamin H K Yip; Martin C S Wong; Samuel Y S Wong; Vincent C H Chung
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 3.738
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.