Literature DB >> 23558244

Breast ultrasound in 22,131 asymptomatic women with negative mammography.

Veronica Girardi1, Mara Tonegutti, Stefano Ciatto, Franco Bonetti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate increment cancer detection rate generated by ultrasound (US).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: US only detected cancers were assessed for 22,131 self-referring asymptomatic women with negative mammography and subgroups by age, previous cancer, breast density. Invasive assessment and surgical biopsy rate were evaluated.
RESULTS: The overall US detection was 1.85 per thousand (41/22,131). In the subgroups it was: 1.95 per thousand (22/11,274) in women <50 years vs 1.75 per thousand (19/10,857) in women ≥ 50 years (p = 0.42), 5.49 per thousand (12/2183) in women with previous cancer vs 1.45 per thousand (29/19,948) in women without cancer history (p = 0.0004), 2.21 per thousand (22/9960) in dense breasts (p = 0.17) vs 1.56 per thousand (19/12,171) in fatty breasts. The US generated invasive assessment was 1.9% (422/22,131). The benign to malignant open surgical biopsy ratio was 0.17 (7/41).
CONCLUSION: Adding US to negative mammography allowed for substantial incremental cancer detection rate (1.85 per thousand), particularly at age <50 years, in women with previous breast cancer and in dense breasts.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast neoplasm; Mammography; Screening; Ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23558244     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  14 in total

Review 1.  Screening ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  John R Scheel; Janie M Lee; Brian L Sprague; Christoph I Lee; Constance D Lehman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  3D Supine Automated Ultrasound (SAUS, ABUS, ABVS) for Supplemental Screening Women with Dense Breasts.

Authors:  Alexander Mundinger
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 3.  Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Joy Melnikow; Joshua J Fenton; Evelyn P Whitlock; Diana L Miglioretti; Meghan S Weyrich; Jamie H Thompson; Kunal Shah
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Characteristics of breast cancer detected by supplementary screening ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hee Jung Moon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2015-05-24

5.  The Values of Combined and Sub-Stratified Imaging Scores with Ultrasonography and Mammography in Breast Cancer Subtypes.

Authors:  Tsun-Hou Chang; Hsian-He Hsu; Yu-Ching Chou; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Giu-Cheng Hsu; Guo-Shu Huang; Guo-Shiou Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Application of the downgrade criteria to supplemental screening ultrasound for women with negative mammography but dense breasts.

Authors:  Soo-Yeon Kim; Min Jung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Eun-Kyung Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matejka Rebolj; Valentina Assi; Adam Brentnall; Dharmishta Parmar; Stephen W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Utility of supplemental screening with breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with dense breast tissue who are not at high risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Geetika A Klevos; Fernando Collado-Mesa; Jose M Net; Monica M Yepes
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

9.  Performance of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Shengfeng Wang; Liwen Zhang; Chao Sheng; Fengju Song; Ping Wang; Yubei Huang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Follow-Up Intervals for Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 Lesions on Screening Ultrasound in Screening and Tertiary Referral Centers.

Authors:  Sun Huh; Hee Jung Suh; Eun Kyung Kim; Min Jung Kim; Jung Hyun Yoon; Vivian Youngjean Park; Hee Jung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.