Literature DB >> 23557928

Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of ceftaroline against Clostridium difficile and propensity to induce C. difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model.

Simon D Baines1, Caroline H Chilton, Grace S Crowther, Sharie L Todhunter, Jane Freeman, Mark H Wilcox.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of exposure to ceftaroline or ceftriaxone on the epidemic Clostridium difficile strain PCR ribotype 027 and the indigenous gut microflora in an in vitro human gut model. Additionally, the MICs of ceftriaxone and ceftaroline for 60 C. difficile isolates were determined.
METHODS: Two triple-stage chemostat gut models were primed with human faeces and exposed to ceftaroline (10 mg/L, twice daily, 7 days) or ceftriaxone (150 mg/L, once daily, 7 days). Populations of indigenous gut microorganisms, C. difficile total viable counts, spore counts, cytotoxin titres and antimicrobial concentrations were monitored throughout. MICs were determined by a standard agar incorporation method.
RESULTS: In the gut model, both ceftaroline and ceftriaxone induced C. difficile spore germination, proliferation and toxin production, although germination occurred 5 days later in the ceftaroline-exposed model. Toxin detection was sustained until the end of the experimental period in both models. No active antimicrobial was detected in vessel 3 of either model, although inhibitory effects on microflora populations were observed. Ceftaroline was ∼8-fold more active against C. difficile than ceftriaxone (geometric mean MICs, 3.38 versus 28.18 mg/L; MIC90s, 4 versus 64 mg/L; and MIC ranges, 0.125-16 versus 8-128 mg/L).
CONCLUSIONS: Ceftaroline, like ceftriaxone, can induce simulated C. difficile infection in a human gut model. However, low in vivo gut concentrations of ceftaroline and increased activity against C. difficile in comparison with ceftriaxone mean that the true propensity of this novel cephalosporin to induce C. difficile infection remains unclear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MICs; cephalosporins; chemostat

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557928     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkt107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

1.  MiniBioReactor Array (MBRA) in vitro gut model: a reliable system to study microbiota-dependent response to antibiotic treatment.

Authors:  C A Hobson; L Vigue; S Naimi; B Chassaing; M Magnan; S Bonacorsi; B Gachet; I El Meouche; A Birgy; O Tenaillon
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Clostridium difficile colonization and antibiotics response in PolyFermS continuous model mimicking elderly intestinal fermentation.

Authors:  Sophie Fehlbaum; Christophe Chassard; Sophie Annick Poeker; Muriel Derrien; Candice Fourmestraux; Christophe Lacroix
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.181

3.  Efficacy of an Optimised Bacteriophage Cocktail to Clear Clostridium difficile in a Batch Fermentation Model.

Authors:  Janet Y Nale; Tamsin A Redgwell; Andrew Millard; Martha R J Clokie
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-13

4.  Microbiological Profile of Sarecycline, a Novel Targeted Spectrum Tetracycline for the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

Authors:  George Zhanel; Ian Critchley; Lynn-Yao Lin; Nancy Alvandi
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Trehalose-Induced Remodelling of the Human Microbiota Affects Clostridioides difficile Infection Outcome in an In Vitro Colonic Model: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Anthony M Buckley; Ines B Moura; Norie Arai; William Spittal; Emma Clark; Yoshihiro Nishida; Hannah C Harris; Karen Bentley; Georgina Davis; Dapeng Wang; Suparna Mitra; Takanobu Higashiyama; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  Development and validation of a chemostat gut model to study both planktonic and biofilm modes of growth of Clostridium difficile and human microbiota.

Authors:  Grace S Crowther; Caroline H Chilton; Sharie L Todhunter; Scott Nicholson; Jane Freeman; Simon D Baines; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Role of cephalosporins in the era of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Mark H Wilcox; James D Chalmers; Carl E Nord; Jane Freeman; Emilio Bouza
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  The use of first-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, cefalexin and cefradine, is not associated with induction of simulated Clostridioides difficile infection.

Authors:  Anthony M Buckley; Ines B Moura; James Altringham; Duncan Ewin; Emma Clark; Karen Bentley; Vikki Wilkinson; William Spittal; Georgina Davis; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 5.790

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.