Literature DB >> 23557225

Inferior intrastromal corneal ring segments in paracentral keratoconus with no coincident topographic and coma axis.

José F Alfonso1, Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto, Begoña Baamonde, Jesus Merayo-Lloves, David Madrid-Costa, Robert Montés-Micó.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the visual and refractive outcomes of implantation of intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) in keratoconic eyes with no coincident topographic and comatic axes.
METHODS: Forty-one keratoconic eyes of 39 patients with no coincident topographic and comatic axes were implanted inferiorly with a Ferrara-type ICRS (Keraring SI6; Mediphacos Inc., Belo Horizonte, Brazil) of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, and 250 μm. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), corneal coma-like root mean square, and residual refractive errors analyzed using vector analysis were recorded before and 6 months after the ICRS implantation.
RESULTS: Mean UDVA was 0.76 ± 0.41 logMAR before and 0.53 ± 0.46 logMAR after surgery (P = .0006). CDVA was 0.13 ± 0.14 logMAR before and 0.07 ± 0.09 logMAR after surgery (P = .0007). Two eyes (4.9%) lost two lines or more of CDVA, 3 eyes (7.32%) lost one line, 16 eyes (39.02%) had no change in CDVA, 9 eyes (21.95%) gained one line, and 11 eyes (26.83%) gained two lines or more of CDVA. The safety index was 1.10. Spherical equivalent was significantly reduced after ICRS implantation (P < .001). Corneal coma-like root mean square changed from 0.80 ± 0.53 μm before surgery to 0.61 ± 0.59 μm after surgery (P = .02) for 4.5 mm of pupil size.
CONCLUSIONS: One Ferrara-type ICRS of 150° of arc with a thickness of 150, 200, or 250 μm implanted inferiorly may reduce both astigmatism and corneal coma-like aberrations in keratoconic eyes with no coincident topographic and comatic axes, providing an improvement of UDVA and CDVA values. Copyright 2013, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557225     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20130318-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  6 in total

1.  Clinical outcomes after intrastromal corneal ring segments reoperation in keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Leonardo Torquetti; Guilherme Ferrara; Franklin Almeida; Leandro Cunha; Paulo Ferrara; Jesús Merayo-Lloves
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 2.  Surgical Options for the Refractive Correction of Keratoconus: Myth or Reality.

Authors:  L Fernández-Vega-Cueto; V Romano; R Zaldivar; C H Gordillo; F Aiello; D Madrid-Costa; J F Alfonso
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.909

3.  Clinical Outcomes of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments and an Extended Range of Vision Intraocular Lens Implantation in Patients with Keratoconus and Cataract.

Authors:  C Lisa; R Zaldivar; A Fernández-Vega Cueto; R M Sanchez-Avila; D Madrid-Costa; J F Alfonso
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 1.909

4.  Long-Term Follow-Up of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments in Paracentral Keratoconus with Coincident Corneal Keratometric, Comatic, and Refractive Axes: Stability of the Procedure.

Authors:  Luis Fernández-Vega Cueto; Carlos Lisa; David Madrid-Costa; Jesús Merayo-Lloves; José F Alfonso
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Efficacy of Different Procedures of Intra-Corneal Ring Segment Implantation in Keratoconus: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cédric Benoist d'Azy; Bruno Pereira; Frédéric Chiambaretta; Frédéric Dutheil
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Intracorneal Ring Segment Implantation for the Management of Keratoconus in Children.

Authors:  Pablo Larco; Pablo Larco; Daniel Torres; David P Piñero
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.