Literature DB >> 23557045

The right to know your genetic parents: from open-identity gamete donation to routine paternity testing.

An Ravelingien1, Guido Pennings.   

Abstract

Over the years a number of countries have abolished anonymous gamete donation and shifted toward open-identity policies. Donor-conceived children are said to have a fundamental "right to know" the identity of their donor. In this article, we trace the arguments that underlie this claim and question its implications. We argue that, given the status attributed to the right to know one's gamete donor, it would be discriminatory not to extend this right to naturally conceived children with misattributed paternity. One way to facilitate this would be through routine paternity testing at birth. While this proposal is likely to raise concerns about the conflicting interests and rights of other people involved, we show that similar concerns apply to the context of open-identity gamete donation. Unless one can identify a rational basis for treating the two groups differently, one's stance toward both cases should be the same.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23557045     DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.776128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bioeth        ISSN: 1526-5161            Impact factor:   11.229


  8 in total

Review 1.  Secondary use of empirical research data in medical ethics papers on gamete donation: forms of use and pitfalls.

Authors:  Veerle Provoost
Journal:  Monash Bioeth Rev       Date:  2015-03

2.  Narrative Identity in Third Party Reproduction: Normative Aspects and Ethical Challenges.

Authors:  Natacha Salomé Lima
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Singapore needs to update regulation of frozen egg donation after permitting social egg freezing.

Authors:  Alexis Heng Boon Chin
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 3.357

4.  Whose right to know? The subjectivity of mothers in mandatory paternity testing.

Authors:  Erin Heidt-Forsythe; Michelle L McGowan
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Donor Conception Disclosure: Directive or Non-Directive Counselling?

Authors:  Inez Raes; An Ravelingien; Guido Pennings
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 1.352

6.  Ethical, Legal and Social Issues in Japan on the Determination of Blood Relationship via DNA Testing.

Authors:  Waki Toya
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2017-06-30

7.  An old problem in a new age: Revisiting the clinical dilemma of misattributed paternity.

Authors:  Laura Hercher; Leila Jamal
Journal:  Appl Transl Genom       Date:  2016-02-01

8.  The (Re) Production of the Genetically Related Body in Law, Technology and Culture: Mitochondria Replacement Therapy.

Authors:  Danielle Griffiths
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.