| Literature DB >> 23555794 |
Raquel Benavides1, Sonia G Rabasa, Elena Granda, Adrián Escudero, José A Hódar, Jordi Martínez-Vilalta, Ana M Rincón, Regino Zamora, Fernando Valladares.
Abstract
Global change triggers shifts in forest composition, with warming and aridification being particularly threatening for the populations located at the rear edge of the species distributions. This is the case of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) in the Mediterranean Basin where uncertainties in relation to its dynamics under these changing scenarios are still high. We analysed the relative effect of climate on the recruitment patterns of Scots pine and its interactions with local biotic and abiotic variables at different spatial scales. Number of seedlings and saplings was surveyed, and their annual shoot growth measured in 96 plots located across altitudinal gradients in three different regions in the Iberian Peninsula. We found a significant influence of climate on demography and performance of recruits, with a non-linear effect of temperature on the presence of juveniles, and a positive effect of precipitation on their survival. Abundance of juveniles of P. sylvestris that underwent their first summer drought was skewed towards higher altitudes than the altitudinal mean range of the conspecific adults and the optimum elevation for seedlings' emergence. At local level, light availability did not influence juveniles' density, but it enhanced their growth. Biotic interactions were found between juveniles and the herb cover (competition) and between the number of newly emerged seedlings and shrubs (facilitation). Results also highlighted the indirect effect that climate exerts over the local factors, modulating the interactions with the pre-existing vegetation that were more evident at more stressful sites. This multiscale approach improves our understanding of the dynamics of these marginal populations and some management criteria can be inferred to boost their conservation under the current global warming.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23555794 PMCID: PMC3608533 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059824
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Location of the sampling sites (black triangles).
Dark grey denotes distribution range of Scots pine (base map: www.euforgen.org).
Descriptive variables measured in the sampling plots in the three study sites.
| Valsaín | Arcalís | Sierra Nevada | |
| Latitude | 40°49′ N | 42°22′N | 37°06′N |
| Longitude | 4°01′W | 1°06′E | 3°27′W |
| Altitudinal range (m) | 1138–1837 | 672–1597 | 1425–1989 |
| T range (°C) | 7.3–10.9 | 7.3–11.6 | 8.7–11.5 |
| Mean T (°C) | 9.3 (1.3) | 9.6 (1.6) | 9.9 (1.0) |
| P range (mm) | 762.7–1025.4 | 572.3–955.1 | 529.7–867.0 |
| Mean P (mm) | 873.6 (91.0) | 827.2 (109.7) | 691.4 (102.7) |
| Mean slope (%) | 15.7(10.3) | 45.1 (19.8) | 35.0 (12.9) |
| Mean cover shrubs (%) | 7.5 (15.8) | 25.7 (26.2) | 26.7 (28.1) |
| Mean cover herbs (%) | 39.0 (32.7) | 28.2 (26.5) | 20.3 (21.5) |
| Mean cover rocks (%) | 2.5 (7.2) | 9.7 (15.3) | 14.0 (20.0) |
| Mean tree density (pines ha−1) | 298.9 (255.4) | 603.7 (473.6) | 165.5 (117.1) |
| Mean basal area (m2 ha−1) | 36.8 (22.7) | 31.8 (13.8) | 19.7 (14.4) |
| Mean dbh of adult pines (cm) | 36.7 (11.8) | 22.9(5.7) | 37.8 (27.3) |
| Mean GSF | 0.39(0.24) | 0.27 (0.12) | 0.43 (0.28) |
| No. observed CY | 3794 | 77 | 45 |
| No. observed SP | 1211 | 197 | 7 |
| No. plots with zero recruits | 1 | 11 | 19 |
Standard deviations are shown in brackets.
T: mean annual temperature, P: annual mean precipitation; dbh: diameter at breast height; GSF: global site factor, CY: current-year seedlings, SP: juveniles older than a year.
Figure 2Distribution of current-year seedlings (CY) and juveniles older than a year (SP) according to a) the annual mean precipitation; and b) the mean annual temperature (with their envelope lines for each cohort).
Distribution of mean growth according to c) the mean annual precipitation and d) mean annual temperature. (BA: mean basal area (m2ha−1); dbh: mean diameter at breast height (cm); both calculated within an interval around the optimum annual mean precipitation (±50 mm) and temperature (±0.5 °C), respectively).
Figure 3a) Altitudinal distribution of juveniles according to their age class and; b) altitudinal distribution of their medians according to each site.
Different letters indicate significant differences (Kruskal-Wallis test)
Zero-Inflated Poisson Mixed Models for the occurrence (absence)* and abundance of recently emerged seedlings and juveniles older than a year (saplings).
| Occurrence Model | Abundance Model | ||||||||
| Variables | Estimate | SE | t value | Pr>|t| | Estimate | SE | t value | Pr>|t| | |
| Seedlings | Constant | 78.5909 | 32.5935 | 2.41 | 0.0179 | −84.6586 | 11.1953 | −7.56 | <.0001 |
|
| Site 2 | −4.1053 | 1.4245 | −2.88 | 0.0049 | 4.5493 | 0.4974 | 9.15 | <.0001 |
|
| Site 3 | 1.5625 | 1.41 | 1.11 | 0.2707 | 2.6094 | 0.5332 | 4.89 | <.0001 |
|
| T | −15.7198 | 6.8578 | −2.29 | 0.0242 | 17.3094 | 2.3224 | 7.45 | <.0001 |
| T2 | 0.7892 | 0.3609 | 2.19 | 0.0313 | −0.9152 | 0.1217 | −7.52 | <.0001 | |
| P | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Slope | - | - | - | - | 0.03153 | 0.01165 | 2.71 | 0.0081 | |
| Herbs | - | - | - | - | −0.03711 | 0.01675 | −2.22 | 0.0292 | |
| Shrubs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Rocks | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| GSF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Herbs xT | - | - | - | - | 0.004191 | 0.00173 | 2.42 | 0.0174 | |
| Shrubs x T | 0.002273 | 0.001005 | 2.26 | 0.0261 | - | - | - | - | |
| GSF x T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Saplings | Constant | 5.2785 | 1.2245 | 4.31 | <.0001 | −32.0442 | 10.2046 | −3.14 | 0.0023 |
|
| Site 2 | −5.1948 | 1.1335 | −4.58 | <.0001 | 1.2807 | 0.949 | 1.35 | 0.1805 |
|
| Site 3 | −4.6633 | 1.1484 | −4.06 | 0.0001 | 1.229 | 0.9268 | 1.33 | 0.1882 |
|
| T | - | - | - | - | 7.0072 | 2.1234 | 3.3 | 0.0014 |
| T2 | - | - | - | - | −0.4299 | 0.1147 | −3.75 | 0.0003 | |
| P | - | - | - | - | 0.00431 | 0.001508 | 2.86 | 0.0053 | |
| Slope | −0.03114 | 0.02128 | −1.46 | 0.1468 | −0.01973 | 0.01113 | −1.77 | 0.0796 | |
| Herbs | 0.01801 | 0.005788 | 3.11 | 0.0025 | −0.0734 | 0.0203 | −3.62 | 0.0005 | |
| Shrubs | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Rocks | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| GSF | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Herbs xT | - | - | - | - | 0.007874 | 0.002344 | 3.36 | 0.0011 | |
| Shrubs x T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| GSF x T | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
Every variable introduced in the models is listed, but only the estimates for the variables included in the final model are shown.
Site 1: Valsaín, Site 2: Arcalís, Site 3: Sierra Nevada. T: mean annual temperature, P: annual mean precipitation, GSF: Global site factor; EF: modelling efficiency; ΔAIC: difference in AIC referred to saturated model.
The parameters estimated in the binary part are referred to the probability P (finding no recruit) assessment, being 1-P the probability of presence.
Figure 4Significant interactions among mean annual temperature and: a) cover of shrubs affecting the probability of current-year seedlings' presence (Pr CY); b) herb cover affecting the abundance of seedlings (No. CY); c) herbs over the abundance of saplings (No. SP); d) GSF affecting mean growth of SP; and e) herbs on mean growth of saplings.
Dotted line shows the mean annual temperature at which the number of CY (a, b) and SP (c) were more frequent, respectively.
No Linear Mixed Model for the mean shoot growth of juveniles.
| Variable | Estimate | SE | t value | Pr>|t| | AIC | ΔAIC | EF |
| Constant | 2.1146 | 0.4303 | 4391 | <.0001 | 3717.2 | 209.6 | 0.407 |
| Age class 1 | −0.5550 | 0.1477 | −3.76 | 0.0005 | |||
| Age class 2 | −1.4442 | 0.1556 | −9.28 | <.0001 | |||
| T | - | - | - | - | |||
| T2 | - | - | - | - | |||
| P | - | - | - | - | |||
| Slope | - | - | - | - | |||
| Herbs | −0.09288 | 0.02941 | −3.16 | 0.0029 | |||
| Shrubs | - | - | - | - | |||
| Rocks | 0.01521- | 0.006872 | 2.21 | 0.0321 | |||
| GSF | 16.0222 | 4.2561 | 3.76 | 0.0005 | |||
| Herbs x T | 0.01051 | 3.11 | 0.0033 | 0.0033 | |||
| Shrubs x T | - | - | - | - | |||
| GSF x T | −1.2034 | 0.4558 | −2.64 | <.0001 |
Every variable introduced in the models is listed, but only the estimates for the variables included in the final model are shown.
T: mean annual temperature; P: annual mean precipitation; GSF: global site factor; Age class 1: 1–2 years old; Age class 2: 3–5 years old; Age class 3: >5 years old; ΔAIC: AIC increment referred to saturated model; EF: modelling efficiency.