Literature DB >> 26725258

Life stage, not climate change, explains observed tree range shifts.

František Máliš1,2, Martin Kopecký3, Petr Petřík4, Jozef Vladovič2, Ján Merganič1, Tomáš Vida1.   

Abstract

Ongoing climate change is expected to shift tree species distribution and therefore affect forest biodiversity and ecosystem services. To assess and project tree distributional shifts, researchers may compare the distribution of juvenile and adult trees under the assumption that differences between tree life stages reflect distributional shifts triggered by climate change. However, the distribution of tree life stages could differ within the lifespan of trees, therefore, we hypothesize that currently observed distributional differences could represent shifts over ontogeny as opposed to climatically driven changes. Here, we test this hypothesis with data from 1435 plots resurveyed after more than three decades across the Western Carpathians. We compared seedling, sapling and adult distribution of 12 tree species along elevation, temperature and precipitation gradients. We analyzed (i) temporal shifts between the surveys and (ii) distributional differences between tree life stages within both surveys. Despite climate warming, tree species distribution of any life stage did not shift directionally upward along elevation between the surveys. Temporal elevational shifts were species specific and an order of magnitude lower than differences among tree life stages within the surveys. Our results show that the observed range shifts among tree life stages are more consistent with ontogenetic differences in the species' environmental requirements than with responses to recent climate change. The distribution of seedlings substantially differed from saplings and adults, while the distribution of saplings did not differ from adults, indicating a critical transition between seedling and sapling tree life stages. Future research has to take ontogenetic differences among life stages into account as we found that distributional differences recently observed worldwide may not reflect climate change but rather the different environmental requirements of tree life stages.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  elevational range shift; realized niche; semipermanent plots; temperate forests; tree life stages; tree ontogeny; vegetation resurvey

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26725258      PMCID: PMC5424071          DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13210

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  22 in total

Review 1.  Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change.

Authors:  M B Davis; R G Shaw
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Species coexistence in temperate, mixed deciduous forests.

Authors:  T Nakashizuka
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Critical loads of acidity for forest soils and relationship to forest decline in the northern Czech Republic.

Authors:  Cecilia Akselsson; Jonas Ardö; Harald Sverdrup
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought.

Authors:  David D Breshears; Neil S Cobb; Paul M Rich; Kevin P Price; Craig D Allen; Randy G Balice; William H Romme; Jude H Kastens; M Lisa Floyd; Jayne Belnap; Jesse J Anderson; Orrin B Myers; Clifton W Meyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Niche dynamics in space and time.

Authors:  Peter B Pearman; Antoine Guisan; Olivier Broennimann; Christophe F Randin
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Rapid shifts in plant distribution with recent climate change.

Authors:  Anne E Kelly; Michael L Goulden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States.

Authors:  Phillip J van Mantgem; Nathan L Stephenson; John C Byrne; Lori D Daniels; Jerry F Franklin; Peter Z Fulé; Mark E Harmon; Andrew J Larson; Jeremy M Smith; Alan H Taylor; Thomas T Veblen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  A significant upward shift in plant species optimum elevation during the 20th century.

Authors:  J Lenoir; J C Gégout; P A Marquet; P de Ruffray; H Brisse
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming.

Authors:  I-Ching Chen; Jane K Hill; Ralf Ohlemüller; David B Roy; Chris D Thomas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Changes in climatic water balance drive downhill shifts in plant species' optimum elevations.

Authors:  Shawn M Crimmins; Solomon Z Dobrowski; Jonathan A Greenberg; John T Abatzoglou; Alison R Mynsberge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  4 in total

1.  Tree Wave Migration Across an Elevation Gradient in the Altai Mountains, Siberia.

Authors:  Viacheslav I Kharuk; Sergei T Im; Maria L Dvinskaya; Kenneth J Ranson; Il'ya A Petrov
Journal:  J Mt Sci       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  North American tree migration paced by climate in the West, lagging in the East.

Authors:  Shubhi Sharma; Robert Andrus; Yves Bergeron; Michal Bogdziewicz; Don C Bragg; Dale Brockway; Natalie L Cleavitt; Benoit Courbaud; Adrian J Das; Michael Dietze; Timothy J Fahey; Jerry F Franklin; Gregory S Gilbert; Cathryn H Greenberg; Qinfeng Guo; Janneke Hille Ris Lambers; Ines Ibanez; Jill F Johnstone; Christopher L Kilner; Johannes M H Knops; Walter D Koenig; Georges Kunstler; Jalene M LaMontagne; Diana Macias; Emily Moran; Jonathan A Myers; Robert Parmenter; Ian S Pearse; Renata Poulton-Kamakura; Miranda D Redmond; Chantal D Reid; Kyle C Rodman; C Lane Scher; William H Schlesinger; Michael A Steele; Nathan L Stephenson; Jennifer J Swenson; Margaret Swift; Thomas T Veblen; Amy V Whipple; Thomas G Whitham; Andreas P Wion; Christopher W Woodall; Roman Zlotin; James S Clark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Effects of topoclimatic complexity on the composition of woody plant communities.

Authors:  Meagan F Oldfather; Matthew N Britton; Prahlad D Papper; Michael J Koontz; Michelle M Halbur; Celeste Dodge; Alan L Flint; Lorriane E Flint; David D Ackerly
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  The Concentration of Non-structural Carbohydrates, N, and P in Quercus variabilis Does Not Decline Toward Its Northernmost Distribution Range Along a 1500 km Transect in China.

Authors:  Jian-Feng Liu; Yun-Peng Deng; Xiao-Fei Wang; Yan-Yan Ni; Qi Wang; Wen-Fa Xiao; Jing-Pin Lei; Ze-Ping Jiang; Mai-He Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.753

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.