Literature DB >> 23555505

Non-Contrast Renal MR Angiography: Value of Subtraction of Tagging and Non-Tagging Technique.

Takehiro Shimada1, Makoto Amanuma, Ayako Takahashi, Yoshito Tsushima.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the usefulness of the subtraction technique of non-contrast renal magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) between tagged and non-tagged data collection.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed renal MRA on eleven healthy volunteers using a 3T MRI unit. For renal MRA, a three dimensional balanced type steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence (True FISP, Siemens) was used with diaphragmatic navigator gating. We tried to acquire selective arterial images by subtracting black-blood images (tagged images, on which arterial longitudinal magnetization was nearly zero by selective inversion of upper-stream aortic flow) from bright-blood images (non-tagged images, on which arterial flow is bright due to inflow effect). For analysis, two radiologists independently evaluated the visual quality of the axial and coronal targeted maximum intensity projection images (MIP) of original bright-blood MRA and subtraction MRA.
RESULTS: Visualization of the main stem of the renal arteries and their 1st branches were satisfactory on both techniques, and there was no statistically significant difference. The score of 2nd branch appeared superior with the subtraction method, but only the right side showed a statistically significant difference (P <0.01). Visualization of small intraparenchymal arteries was significantly superior with subtraction method on both sides.
CONCLUSION: We tried to improve selective demonstration of renal arterial branches using subtraction technique. Although full sequence optimization was not performed, this pilot study showed this technique to be slightly time-consuming but superior in visualization of peripheral branches and possibly more sensitive in detecting small vessel abnormalities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3T MRI; SSFP imaging; magnetic resonance angiography (MRA); non-contrast technique; renal artery

Year:  2012        PMID: 23555505      PMCID: PMC3595873          DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.11.00065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  24 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic subtraction contrast-enhanced MR angiography: technique, clinical applications, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Y Watanabe; M Dohke; A Okumura; Y Amoh; T Ishimori; K Oda; T Hayashi; A Hiyama; Y Dodo
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Free-breathing renal MR angiography with steady-state free-precession (SSFP) and slab-selective spin inversion: initial results.

Authors:  Marcus Katoh; Arno Buecker; Matthias Stuber; Rolf W Günther; Elmar Spuentrup
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  James F Glockner; Naoki Takahashi; Akira Kawashima; David A Woodrum; David W Stanley; Naoyuki Takei; Mitsuharu Miyoshi; Wei Sun
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Nonenhanced free-breathing ECG-gated steady-state free precession 3D MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison between 1.5 T and 3 T.

Authors:  Rotem Shlomo Lanzman; Patric Kröpil; Peter Schmitt; Sonja-Marie Freitag; Adrian Ringelstein; Hans Jörg Wittsack; Dirk Blondin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Oliver K Mohrs; Steffen E Petersen; Thomas Schulze; Michael Zieschang; Harald Küx; Peter Schmitt; Sabine Bergemann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Non-contrast-enhanced hepatic MR angiography with true steady-state free-precession and time spatial labeling inversion pulse: optimization of the technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Kotaro Shimada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Tomohisa Okada; Yoji Maetani; Shigeki Arizono; Yuusuke Hirokawa; Toshikazu Kamae; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Daisuke Utsunomiya; Mitsue Miyazaki; Yohei Nomitsu; Yosuke Komeda; Takashi Okigawa; Joji Urata; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 2.993

Review 8.  Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen.

Authors:  Mitsue Miyazaki; Hiroyoshi Isoda
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  3D noncontrast MR angiography of the distal lower extremities using flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD)-prepared balanced SSFP.

Authors:  Zhaoyang Fan; John Sheehan; Xiaoming Bi; Xin Liu; James Carr; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis associated with gadolinium based contrast agents: a summary of the medical literature reporting.

Authors:  Dale R Broome
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 3.528

View more
  2 in total

1.  Non-contrast MR angiography versus contrast enhanced MR angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis: a comparative analysis in 400 renal arteries.

Authors:  Hira Lal; Rani Kunti Randhir Singh; Priyank Yadav; Ankusha Yadav; Dharmendra Bhadauria; Anuradha Singh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for Budd-Chiari syndrome: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Peng Xu; Lulu Lyu; Muhammad Umair Sami; Xin Lu; Haitao Ge; Yutao Rong; Chunfeng Hu; Kai Xu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.447

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.