Literature DB >> 18728334

Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis.

Daisuke Utsunomiya1, Mitsue Miyazaki, Yohei Nomitsu, Yosuke Komeda, Takashi Okigawa, Joji Urata, Yasuyuki Yamashita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The association between a gadolinium-based contrast material and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis has been discussed. The purpose of our study was to evaluate whether non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) might provide sufficient information of renal artery stenosis. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The non-contrast MRA of 26 patients with hypertension was retrospectively reviewed in the present study. The significant renal artery stenosis was visually evaluated by comparing non-contrast MRA with computed tomography or conventional angiographic finding. Difference of the intensities between the proximal and distal aorta was quantitatively evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of non-contrast MRA in the evaluation of the renal artery stenosis was 78%, 91%, 64% and 96%, respectively. The distal abdominal aorta showed less signal intensity than the proximal aorta by 16.9+/-12.2%.
CONCLUSIONS: Non-contrast MRA is a non-invasive and effective method that allows evaluation of the renal artery stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18728334     DOI: 10.1253/circj.cj-08-0005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  10 in total

Review 1.  Noncontrast MR angiography: An update.

Authors:  Robert R Edelman; Ioannis Koktzoglou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Non-contrast-enhanced MRA of renal artery stenosis: validation against DSA in a porcine model.

Authors:  T A Bley; C J François; M L Schiebler; O Wieben; N Takei; J H Brittain; A Munoz Del Rio; T M Grist; S B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  MRI and MRA of Aortic Disease.

Authors:  Kunihiro Yoshioka; Ryoichi Tanaka
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2010-12-25

4.  Non-Contrast Renal MR Angiography: Value of Subtraction of Tagging and Non-Tagging Technique.

Authors:  Takehiro Shimada; Makoto Amanuma; Ayako Takahashi; Yoshito Tsushima
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2012

5.  Non-contrast MR angiography versus contrast enhanced MR angiography for detection of renal artery stenosis: a comparative analysis in 400 renal arteries.

Authors:  Hira Lal; Rani Kunti Randhir Singh; Priyank Yadav; Ankusha Yadav; Dharmendra Bhadauria; Anuradha Singh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-11-02

6.  Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA.

Authors:  Michael M Y Khoo; Dhafer Deeab; Wladyslaw M W Gedroyc; Neil Duncan; David Taube; Elizabeth A Dick
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Quadruple inversion-recovery b-SSFP MRA of the abdomen: initial clinical validation.

Authors:  Iliyana P Atanasova; Ruth P Lim; Hersh Chandarana; Pippa Storey; Mary T Bruno; Daniel Kim; Vivian S Lee
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Accuracy of unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of renal artery stenosis.

Authors:  Carmen Sebastià; Alejandro D Sotomayor; Blanca Paño; Rafael Salvador; Marta Burrel; Albert Botey; Carlos Nicolau
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2016-08-04

9.  Non-contrast enhanced 3D SSFP MRA of the renal allograft vasculature: a comparison between radial linear combination and Cartesian inflow-weighted acquisitions.

Authors:  Eric M Bultman; Jessica Klaers; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Mark L Schiebler; Scott B Reeder; Walter F Block
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.130

10.  Optimal Blood Suppression Inversion Time Based on Breathing Rates and Heart Rates to Improve Renal Artery Visibility in Spatial Labeling with Multiple Inversion Pulses: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Yigang Pei; Fang Li; Hao Shen; Xueying Long; Hui Liu; Xiaoyi Wang; Jinkang Liu; Wenzheng Li
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.500

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.