OBJECTIVE: We preoperatively assessed varicose veins by means of computed tomography (CT) with contrast injection in the veins of the lower extremity (CT venography). This paper reports the procedures, results and implications of CT venography from the surgical aspect. METHODS: A total of 48 legs in 39 patients were examined. Contrast medium was diluted ten-fold and injected into the lower extremity veins, often using a dual route of injection. The images were reconstructed with the volume-rendering method. RESULTS: CT venography clearly visualized the veins with a small amount of contrast medium and facilitated the identification of anatomy that was not suitable for passing the stripper. In addition, CT venography helped identify unusual types of varicose veins or uncommon sites of inflow of small saphenous veins. Such information was helpful for avoiding unexpected vascular injury or for minimizing skin incision. Dual-route injection was beneficial to minimize the blind zones. Doppler ultrasound could be more focused on hemodynamic assessment and determination of incision sites. CONCLUSIONS: CT Venography is feasible in all cases of varicose veins. When performed in conjunction with ultrasonography, it appears to facilitate the safe and efficient treatment of various types of varicose veins.
OBJECTIVE: We preoperatively assessed varicose veins by means of computed tomography (CT) with contrast injection in the veins of the lower extremity (CT venography). This paper reports the procedures, results and implications of CT venography from the surgical aspect. METHODS: A total of 48 legs in 39 patients were examined. Contrast medium was diluted ten-fold and injected into the lower extremity veins, often using a dual route of injection. The images were reconstructed with the volume-rendering method. RESULTS: CT venography clearly visualized the veins with a small amount of contrast medium and facilitated the identification of anatomy that was not suitable for passing the stripper. In addition, CT venography helped identify unusual types of varicose veins or uncommon sites of inflow of small saphenous veins. Such information was helpful for avoiding unexpected vascular injury or for minimizing skin incision. Dual-route injection was beneficial to minimize the blind zones. Doppler ultrasound could be more focused on hemodynamic assessment and determination of incision sites. CONCLUSIONS: CT Venography is feasible in all cases of varicose veins. When performed in conjunction with ultrasonography, it appears to facilitate the safe and efficient treatment of various types of varicose veins.
Authors: Whal Lee; Jin Wook Chung; Yong Hu Yin; Hwan Jun Jae; Sang Joon Kim; Jongwon Ha; Jae Hyung Park Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: H G Beebe; J J Bergan; D Bergqvist; B Eklof; I Eriksson; M P Goldman; L J Greenfield; R W Hobson; C Juhan; R L Kistner Journal: Int Angiol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: J Koizumi; T Horie; I Muro; E Kimura; K Shimizu; M Orii; Y Imai; B Janne D'Othee; T Nishibe; M Wada; S Momoshima Journal: Int Angiol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 2.789