Literature DB >> 23555081

Phosphocitrate is potentially a disease-modifying drug for noncrystal-associated osteoarthritis.

Yubo Sun1, David R Mauerhan, Atiya M Franklin, James Norton, Edward N Hanley, Helen E Gruber.   

Abstract

Phosphocitrate (PC), a calcification inhibitor, inhibits the development of crystal-associated osteoarthritis (OA) in Hartley guinea pigs. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying its disease-modifying effect remain elusive. This study sought to test the hypothesis that PC has calcium crystal-independent biological activities which are, at least in part, responsible for its disease-modifying activity. We found that PC inhibited the proliferation of OA fibroblast-like synoviocytes in the absence of calcium crystals. Consistent with its effect on cell proliferation, PC downregulated the expression of numerous genes classified in cell proliferation. PC also downregulated the expression of many genes classified in angiogenesis and inflammatory response including prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2, interleukin-1 receptor, type I, and chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2. In contrast, PC upregulated the expression of many genes classified in musculoskeletal tissue development, including aggrecan, type I collagen, and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5. These findings suggest that PC is not only a promising disease-modifying drug for crystal-associated OA but also for noncrystal-associated OA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23555081      PMCID: PMC3595112          DOI: 10.1155/2013/326267

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive disorder characterized by the degeneration of articular cartilage, formation of osteophytes, and synovial lining hyperplasia. It is one of the most prevalent causes of disability in the aging population and has enormous economic and social consequences. However, existing treatment options only provide symptomatic relief and have no effect on the progression of the underlying disease. The lack of progress in the development of disease-modifying drugs for OA therapy is largely due to our limited understanding of the pathogenesis of the disease and our insufficient knowledge about the molecular targets for intervention. The most apparent pathological changes in OA are usually found in articular cartilage. Synovium of patients with OA has traditionally been considered to be normal and is used as control in studies to investigate the pathological changes in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [1, 2]. OA fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLSs) have also been used as control cells in some studies [3, 4]. However, synovial lining hyperplasia and inflammation, a potential leading cause of knee pain, are common findings in OA patients [5, 6]. Studies have demonstrated that OA synovium and OA FLSs display different gene expression profiles compared with the synovium and FLSs derived from normal control subjects [7, 8]. These findings indicate that OA synovium plays an important role in the pathogenesis of OA. Basic calcium phosphate (BCP) crystal and calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate (CPPD) crystal are the two most common intra-articular crystals [9, 10]. The presence of these crystals in the synovial fluid or joint tissues of end-stage OA patients is a well-recognized event [11-14]. In cell culture, calcium crystals induced mitogenesis, production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), and endocytotic activity of cells [15-18]. However, the clinical significance of these calcium crystals and their role in the development and/or progression of OA remain unclear [14, 19–21]. Phosphocitrate (PC), a potent anticalcification molecule, was originally identified in mammalian mitochondria [22]. PC inhibits the formation and growth of calcium crystals by its strong binding to amorphous calcium phosphates aggregates and the surface of calcium crystals. In cell cultures, PC inhibited crystal-induced mitogenesis, expression of MMPs, and cell death [23-25]. In Hartley guinea pig model of crystal-associated OA, PC inhibited meniscal calcification and reduced the degeneration of articular cartilage [26]. These findings appear to provide support for the notions that calcium crystals play an important role in the development and/or progression of OA and that calcification inhibitors are promising disease-modifying drugs for crystal-associated OA therapy [27]. However, a bisphosphonate, a potent calcification inhibitor similar to PC, failed to inhibit the development of OA in Hartley guinea pigs, raising questions about the role of crystals in the development of crystal-associated OA [28]. Several studies indicate that PC has biological activities unrelated to its anticalcification activity. For example, PC reduced the degradation of low-density lipoprotein by 60% [29]. PC inhibited transforming growth factor-β1-induced proliferation of progressive ankylosis fibroblasts [30]. We decide to perform this study to test the hypothesis that PC has unique crystal-independent biological activities which are responsible, at least in part, for its disease-modifying activity.

2. Materials and Methods

Dulbecco's modified eagle medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and stock antibiotic/antimycotic mixture were products of Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA). PC was synthesized according to the procedure previously described [31].

2.1. Cell Cultures

Telomerase-transduced human OA FLSs, or hTERT-OA 13A FLSs, have been previously described [8]. Primary OA FLSs were prepared from synovial tissues collected with the approval of the authors' institutional review board from OA patients undergoing total joint replacement surgery at our medical center. The need for informed consent was waived because the synovial tissues were surgical waste, and no private patient information was collected. Briefly, synovial tissues were minced into small pieces (3 mm × 3 mm) and cultured in 100 mm plates at 37°C in DMEM containing 10% FBS. Every three days, culture medium was changed. When OA FLSs reached 80% confluence, they were harvested and passaged. Human foreskin fibroblasts were obtained from ATCC (CRL-2429, Mananas, USA) and expanded in DMEM containing 10% FBS.

2.1.1. Cell Proliferation

hTERT-OA 13A FLSs (4 × 104) were plated in six-well cluster plates. On the second day, DMEM containing 10% FBS and PC was added to the top three wells. DMEM containing 10% FBS without PC was added to bottom three wells. The culture medium was changed every three days until the cells in the bottom wells without PC reached 85% confluence. All cells were then harvested and cell numbers were determined by cell count using a hemocytometer. This proliferation assay was also performed using primary OA FLSs and foreskin fibroblasts for comparison.

2.2. RNA Extraction

hTERT-OA 13A FLSs were plated in four 100 mm plates at 90% confluence. On the second day, DMEM containing 1% FBS was added. On the third day, DMEM in two plates was replaced with DMEM containing 1% FBS and PC at a final concentration of 0.6 mM. DMEM in other two plates was replaced with DMEM containing 1% FBS but without PC. Twenty-four hours later, total RNA was extracted from these cells using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and purified using Oligotex kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). These RNA samples were used for microarray analyses and RT-PCR experiments.

2.3. Microarray

Double-stranded DNA was synthesized using SuperScript double-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The DNA product was purified using GeneChip sample cleanup module (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). cRNA was synthesized and biotin labeled using BioArray high yield RNA transcript labeling kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA). The cRNA product was purified using GeneChip sample cleanup module and subsequently chemically fragmented. The fragmented, biotinylated cRNA was hybridized to HG-U133_Plus_2 gene chip using Affymetrix Fluidics Station 400 (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The fluorescent signals were quantified during two scans by Agilent Gene Array Scanner G2500A (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and GeneChip operating Software (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Genesifter software (VizX Labs, Seattle, WA, USA) was used for the analysis of differential gene expression and gene ontology.

2.4. Real-Time RT-PCR

Briefly, cDNA was synthesized using TaqMan Reverse Transcription Reagents (Applied Biosystems, Inc., University Park, IL, USA) using the RNA samples described. Quantification of relative transcript levels of selected genes was performed using ABI7000 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Inc., University Park, IL, USA). TaqMan Gene Expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Inc., University Park, IL, USA) were used. cDNA samples were amplified with an initial Taq DNA polymerase activation step at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 15 seconds and annealing at 60°C for one minute. Fold change was calculated, and the expression level of the genes was normalized to the expression level of the housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) according to the method described [32]. The experiments were performed independently using RNA samples extracted from both hTERT-OA 13A FLSs and primary OA FLSs.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SD. For cell proliferation, the difference between two experimental groups was analyzed using Student's t-test. For real-time RT-PCR, experiment was repeated twice in triplicates. The difference between two experimental groups was analyzed using Student's t-test. In all cases, P values less than 0.01 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS software, version 9.3.

3. Results

3.1. PC Inhibited Proliferation of OA FLSs

PC had no effect on the proliferation of human foreskin fibroblasts (Figure 1(a), the left bar group). However, PC inhibited the proliferation of hTERT-OA 13A FLSs (Figure 1(a), the right bar group). There were about 60% fewer hTERT-OA 13A FLSs in the PC-treated wells after nine days of culture compared with the cells in the untreated wells (P < 0.01).
Figure 1

PC inhibits the proliferation of OA FLSs. (a)There were about 65% fewer hTERT-OA 13A FLSs in the PC-treated wells after nine days of culture compared to those in the untreated wells (P < 0.01). (b) PC and EHDP inhibited the proliferation of primary OA FLSs in a dose-dependent manner.

Next, we examined the effect of PC on cell proliferation using primary OA FLSs. For comparison, we also examined the effect of disodium salt of ethane-1-hydroxy-1, 1-bisphosphonic acid (EHDP), which is a bisphosphonate. As shown in Figure 1(b), both PC and EHDP inhibited the proliferation of primary OA FLSs in a dose-dependent manner. The morphologies of PC-treated OA FLSs and untreated OA FLSs were similar (not shown), indicating that the reduction in cell number was not due to cellular toxicity of PC.

3.2. Effect of PC on Gene Expression

Microarray analysis revealed that of the more than 50,000 transcripts examined, 3,011 transcripts displayed significant differential expression (more than 1.5-fold) between the PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLSs and the untreated hTERT-OA 13A FLSs; 1,558 transcripts were downregulated, and 1,453 transcripts were upregulated by PC. Differentially expressed genes were classified according to gene ontology category biological process. The genes that fell into specific biological processes previously implicated in OA, or suspected to have a role in OA are listed in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Differentially expressed genes in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared with the untreated cells.

Biological processGene nameGene IDDiffer.expre.(fold)*Description
Cell proliferationBLMNM_000057−3.64Bloom syndrome
CCNE2AF112857−3.74Cyclin E2
CCNE1AI671049−2.30Cyclin E1
CDC25AAY137580−3.63Cell division cycle 25 homolog A (S. pombe)
CDC25CNM_001790−2.31Cell division cycle 25 homolog C (S. pombe)
CDC2AA749427−3.13Cell division cycle 2, G1 to S and G2 to M
CDC6NM_001254−2.36Cell division cycle 6 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
CDC7NM_003503−2.12Cell division cycle 7 homolog (S. cerevisiae)
CDCA5BE614410−2.41Cell division cycle associated 5
CDCA8BC001651−2.11Cell division cycle associated 8
CDK2AB012305−2.74Cyclin-dependent kinase 2
NCAPHD38553−2.64Non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit H
HELLSNM_018063−2.49Helicase, lymphoid specific
AURKBAB011446−2.43Aurora kinase B
KIF23AW192521−2.41Kinesin family member 23
CLASP2BC029035−2.40Cytoplasmic linker-associated protein 2
NUF2AF326731−2.35NUF2, NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog
DSN1NM_024918−2.35DSN1, MIND kinetochore complex component, homolog
SPC24AI469788−2.32SPC24, NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog
SPC25AF225416−2.10SPC25, NDC80 kinetochore complex component, homolog
HMGA2AI990940−2.30High mobility group AT-hook 2
LIG1NM_000234−2.25Ligase I, DNA, ATP-dependent
KIFC1BC000712−2.21Kinesin family member C1
BRCA2X95152−2.18Breast cancer 2, early onset
ERCC6LNM_017669−2.17Excision repair cross-complement repair deficiency, comp. group 6 like
SPAG5NM_006461−2.16Sperm-associated antigen 5
NEK2Z25425−2.14Never-in-mitosis-gene-A- (NIMA) related kinase 2
NCAPGNM_022346−2.12Non-SMC condensin I complex, subunit G
ZWINTNM_007057−2.01ZW10 interactor antisense
PARD3BAF428251 3.24 Par-3 partitioning defective 3 homolog B (C. elegans)
11-SepAI333326 2.28 Septin 11

AngiogenesisNRP1AF280547−2.69Neuropilin 1
TEKBF594294−2.58TEK tyrosine kinase, endothelial
ELK3NM_005230−2.42ELK3, ETS-domain protein (SRF accessory protein 2)
EREGNM_001432−1.90Epiregulin
PMLAW291023−1.89Promyelocytic leukemia
COL15A1NM_001855−1.80Collagen, type XV, alpha-1
NRP2AI819729−1.75Neuropilin 2
SPHK1NM_021972−1.72Sphingosine kinase 1
FOXC2NM_005251−1.68Forkhead box C2, mesenchyme forkhead 1 (MFH-1)
SCG2NM_003469−1.66Secretogranin II (chromogranin C)
EDNRANM_001957−1.56Endothelin receptor type A
TGFBR2NM_003242−1.51Transforming growth factor, beta-receptor II (70/80kDa)
ROBO4AA156022−1.51Roundabout homolog 4, magic roundabout (Drosophila)
JAG1AI4578172.42Jagged 1 (Alagille syndrome)
NOTCH4AI3412711.75Notch homolog 4 (Drosophila)
RUNX1D897881.73Runt-related transcription factor 1
EPAS1NM_0014301.67Endothelial PAS domain protein 1

Inflammatory responsePTGS2AY151286−6.09Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2
SERPINA1AF119873−2.15Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A
GPR68AI805006−2.15G protein-coupled receptor 68
BMPR1BAA935461−2.12Bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type IB
EVI1BE466525−2.00Ecotropic viral integration site 1
FOSBC004490−1.92V-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog
IRAK2AI246590−1.82Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2
CCL2S69738−1.82Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
CCR1NM_001295−1.60Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1
CXCL2M57731−1.66Chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 2
SPNBC035510−1.79Sialophorin (leukosialin, CD43)
TLR4AF177765−1.70Toll-like receptor 4
SCG2NM_003469−1.66Secretogranin II (chromogranin C)
FN1AJ276395−1.58Fibronectin 1
KLKB1BE326857−1.52Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily V, polypeptide 2
NDST1NM_0015432.05N-Deacetylase/N-sulfotransferase (heparan glucosaminyl) 1
C3NM_0000642.05Complement component 3
SERPINA3NM_0010851.88Serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A
SBNO2AC0053901.78Strawberry notch homolog 2 (Drosophila)
NFKBIZBE6465731.74Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide enhancer in B-cells inhibitor zeta
MASP1NM_0018791.64Mannan-binding lectin serine peptidase 1
STAT5BNM_0124481.59Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B

Response to painTACR1AA461490−4.39Tachykinin receptor 1
COMTBG149428−2.03Catechol-O-methyltransferase
CACNA1ABC042451−2.00Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, P/Q type, alpha-1A subunit

Response to interleukin-1SRCNM_005417−3.95V-src sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (avian)
IRAK2AI246590−1.82Interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 2
PCSK1NM_000439−1.60Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1
IL1R1AK026803−1.59Interleukin-1 receptor, type I
GHRNM_000163 1.76 Growth hormone receptor

Cytokine- and chemokine- mediatedEREGNM_001432−1.90Epiregulin
CCL2S69738−1.82Chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2
LIFRNM_002310−1.77Leukemia inhibitory factor receptor-alpha
RQCD1BC007102−1.76RCD1 required for cell differentiation1 homolog (S. pombe)
LRP8NM_004631−1.73Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 8, apolipoprotein e receptor
CCR1NM_001295−1.60Chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1
IL1RIAK026803−1.59Interleukin-1 receptor, type I
STAT3BF5089772.01Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
STAT5BNM_0124481.59Signal transducer and activator of transcription 5B

Interleukin-6 productionBCL10AA994334−2.38B-cell CLL/lymphoma 10
TNFAIP3AI738896−2.07Tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3
FOXP3NM_014009−1.92Forkhead box P3
EREGNM_001432−1.90Epiregulin
TOLR4AF177765−1.70Toll-like receptor 4
ADORA2BNM_000676−1.59Adenosine A2b receptor
IL6RNM_0005652.03Interleukin-6 receptor

MiscellaneousPLAUK03226−2.21Plasminogen activator, urokinase
PLAURU08839−1.92Plasminogen activator, urokinase receptor
PLA2G4AM68874−1.51Phospholipase A2, group IVA (cytosolic, calcium dependent)
PTGER4AA897516−1.91Prostaglandin E receptor 4 (subtype EP4)
EGR1AI459194−2.25Early growth response 1
FOSBC004490−1.92V-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog
FOSL1BG251266−1.95FOS-like antigen 1
THBS1BF0841052.41Thrombospondin 1

*Negative number indicates decreased expression (fold) in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared with the untreated cells. Positive number indicates elevated expression (fold) in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared with the untreated cells.

Table 2

Differentially expressed genes in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared to the untreated cells.

Biological processGene name Gene IDDiffer.Expre.(fold)*Description
Muscle tissue developmentIGFBP5AW1575488.57Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5
CACNB4NM_0007262.73Calcium channel, voltage-dependent, beta-4-subunit
TPM1AI5216182.43Tropomyosin 1 (alpha)
JAG1U612762.02Jagged 1 (Alagille syndrome)
MORF4L2H439761.90Mortality factor 4 like 2
NRG1NM_0139571.88Neuregulin 1
SIRT2BG7227791.86Sirtuin (silent mating type information regulation 2 homolog) 2
NF1D126251.80Neurofibromin 1
OBSL1BF4466881.78Obscurin-like 1
MBNL1AA7322401.73Muscleblind-like (Drosophila)
TPM1NM_0003661.72Tropomyosin 1 (alpha)
CAV2AA1501101.67Caveolin 2
RXRABE6758001.66Retinoid X receptor, alpha
NR2F2AL5542451.63Nuclear receptor subfamily 2, group F, member 2
TCF7L2AV7214301.61Transcription factor 7-like 2 (T-cell specific, HMG-box)
TBX2U28049−4.17T-box 2
ADRB2NM_000024−2.36Adrenergic, beta-2-receptor, surface
SORT1BE742268−1.93Sortilin 1
GJC1NM_005497−1.77Gap junction protein, gamma 1, 45 kDa
CENPFU30872−1.77Centromere protein F, 350/400 ka (mitosin)
BCL2NM_000657−1.71B-cell CLL/lymphoma 2
TBX3U69556−1.71T-box 3
SDC1NM_002997−1.65Syndecan 1
TBX5AW269421−1.54T-box 5
RARBNM_015854−1.51Retinoic acid receptor, beta

Skeletal developmentANXA2D283642.17Annexin A2
VDRAA7722852.11Vitamin D (1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor
GNASAI6931431.95GNAS complex locus
ACANNM_0011351.80Aggrecan
COL1A1AI7436211.66Collagen, type I, alpha-1
COL1A2AA6285351.88Collagen, type I, alpha-2
COL11A1NM_0018541.50Collagen, type XI, alpha-1
COL12A1AU1466511.93Collagen, type XII, alpha-1
MSX2D893771.85Msh homeobox 2
GHRNM_0001631.76Growth hormone receptor
MEF2CAL5365171.59Myocyte enhancer factor 2C
THRANM_0032501.57Thyroid hormone receptor, alpha
RUNX2AW4695461.55Runt-related transcription factor 2
CLEC3BNM_0032781.55Exosome component 7
MEF2CN224681.55Myocyte enhancer factor 2C
IGFBP4NM_0015521.54Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4
PRKRAAA2794621.53Protein kinase, interferon-inducible RNA-dependent activator
TNFRSF11BNM_0025461.50Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 11b
BMPR1BAA935461−2.12Bone morphogenetic protein receptor, type IB
ANKHAF274753−1.93Ankylosis, progressive homolog (mouse)
ACVR2ANM_001616−1.89Activin A receptor, type IIA
CYTL1NM_018659−1.83Cytokine-like 1
TBX3U69556−1.71T-box 3 (ulnar mammary syndrome)
SOX9NM_000346−1.71SRY- (sex-determining-region-Y-) box 9
FOXC2NM_005251−1.68Forkhead box C2 (MFH-1, mesenchyme forkhead 1)
KIAA1217BC017424−1.66KIAA1217
MMP9NM_004994−1.61Matrix metallopeptidase 9
TGFBR2NM_003242−1.51Transforming growth factor, beta-receptor II (70/80 kDa)

Collagen biosynthetic processCOL3A1AU146808 1.83 Collagen, type III, alpha-1
COL1A2AA628535 1.88 Collagen, type I, alpha-2
COL1A1AI743621 1.66 Collagen, type I, alpha-1
TRAM2AI986461 1.58 Translocation-associated membrane protein 2
ITGA2N95414−1.74Integrin, alpha-2 (CD49B, alpha-2 subunit of VLA-2 receptor)

Collagen catabolic processMMP3NM_002422 3.18 Matrix metallopeptidase 3 (stromelysin 1, progelatinase)
ADAMTS5BI254089 3.32 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 5
ADAMTS14W60649 2.15 ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif, 14
MMP16U79292 1.80 Matrix metallopeptidase 16 (membrane inserted)
MMP9NM_004994−1.61Matrix metallopeptidase 9

*Negative number indicates decreased expression (fold) in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared with the untreated cells. Positive number indicates elevated expression (fold) in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLS compared with the untreated cells.

As shown in Table 1, the expression of numerous genes classified in cell proliferation was downregulated by PC. Of the 32 differentially expressed genes with more than twofold changes between the PC-treated cells and untreated cells, the expression of 30 genes, including cyclin E1 (CCNE1; −2.30-fold change), cyclin E2 (CCNE2; −3.74-fold change), and cell division cycle 25 homolog C (CDC25C; −2.31-fold change), was downregulated by PC. This downregulatory effect of PC on the genes associated with cell proliferation is consistent with the finding that PC inhibited the proliferation of OA FLSs (Figure 1). The expression of many genes classified in angiogenesis and inflammatory response was also downregulated by PC. Of the 18 differentially expressed genes classified in angiogenesis, the expression of 13 genes, including neuropilin 1 (NRP1; −2.69-fold change) and TEK tyrosine kinase (TEK; −2.58-fold change), was downregulated by PC. Of the 22 differentially expressed genes classified in inflammatory response, the expression of 15 genes, including prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2/cyclooxygenase (PTGS2/Cox-2; −6.09-fold change), chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2/MCP-1; −1.82-fold change), and chemokine (C-X-C) ligand 2 (CXCL2; 1.66-fold change), was downregulated by PC. In addition, of the 3 differentially expressed genes classified in response to pain, the expression of all 3 genes, including tachykinin receptor 1 (TACR1, −4.39), was downregulated by PC. Of the 5 differentially expressed genes classified in the response to interleukin-1 (IL-1), the expression of 4 genes, including V-src sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (SRC, −3.95-fold change), IL-1 receptor type 1 (IL1R1; −1.59-fold change), and IL-1 receptor-associated kinase 2 (IRAK2; −1.82-fold change), was downregulated by PC. Furthermore, the expression of many genes classified in the cytokine- and chemokine-mediated signal pathway and IL-6 production was downregulated by PC (Table 1). Of the 9 differentially expressed genes classified in the cytokine and chemokine-mediated signal pathway, the expression of 7 genes, including chemokine (C-C motif) receptor 1 (CCR1, −1.60-fold change), was downregulated by PC. Of the 7 differentially expressed genes classified in IL-6 production, the expression of 6 genes, including tumor necrosis factor, alpha-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3, −2.07-fold), was downregulated by PC. Most of the genes upregulated by PC fell into biological processes associated with musculoskeletal tissue development. For example, of the 25 differentially expressed genes classified in muscle tissue development, the expression of 15 genes, including insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5; 8.57-fold change), was upregulated by PC. Of the 28 differentially expressed genes classified in skeletal development, the expression of 18 genes, including annexin A2 (2.17-fold change), vitamin D (1,25- dihydroxyvitamin D3) receptor (VDR; 2.11-fold change), aggrecan (ACAN; 1.80-fold change), collagen type 1, alpha-1 (COL1A1; 1.66-fold change), and collagen type XI alpha-1 (COL11A1; 1.50-fold change), was upregulated by PC (Table 2).

3.3. Real-Time RT-PCR

The genes selected for validation for the differential expression between the PC-treated and untreated hTERT-OA 13A FLSs by real-time RT-PCR were listed in Table 3. As shown, the differential expressions of the genes examined were confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.
Table 3

Differential expression confirmed by real-time RT-PCR.

Gene nameGene IDDifferential expression microarrayDifferential expression RT-PCR*Differential expression RT-PCR**
BLMNM_000057−3.64−4.23−3.95
HELLSNM_018063−2.49−2.87−2.12
CCNE2AF112857−3.74−3.93−3.70
CDC25CNM_001790−2.31−2.01−1.94
EGR1AI459194−2.25−2.45−3.29
FOSL1BG251266−1.95−2.31−2.11
PLAURU08839−1.92−2.41−3.22
PLA2G4AM68874−1.51−1.86−2.11
PTGS2AY151286−6.09−5.77−5.10
TACR1AA461490−4.39−3.92−3.45
CCL2S69738−1.82−2.02−1.79
GPR68AI805006−2.15−2.54−2.28
CACNA1ABC042451−2.00−2.10−2.22
IGFBP5AW1575488.576.325.46
ADAMTS5BI2540893.322.812.11
COL1A2AA6285351.881.401.64

*Differential expression—the numbers are the ratio of the relative expression level of a specific gene in PC-treated hTERT-OA 13A FLSs compared with the relative expression level of the specific gene in the untreated hTERT-OA 13A FLSs. **Differential expression—the numbers are the ratio of the relative expression level of a specific gene in PC-treated primary FLSs compared with the relative expression level of the specific gene in the untreated primary OA FLSs.

4. Discussion

Previous studies demonstrated that PC inhibited BCP crystal-stimulated mitogenesis and expression of PTGS2/Cox-2 [15, 33, 34]. These observations provided the bases for the hypothesis that PC is potentially a disease-modifying drug for crystal-associated OA. However, the findings presented in this study clearly indicate that the inhibitory activities of PC on mitogenesis and proliferation of OA FLSs and the downregulatory activity of PC on the expression of PTGS2/Cox-2 are intrinsic properties of PC. These distinct biological activities of PC are not dependent on the presence of calcium crystals. Synovial hyperplasia is associated with the severity of knee pain and fast hyaline articular cartilage loss in OA [35, 36]. Synovial hyperplasia is also associated with synovial angiogenesis [37]. OA FLSs, but not normal control FLSs, induced a significant enhancement of angiogenesis [38]. These observations indicate that OA FLSs play an important role in the pathogenesis of OA. In this study, we demonstrated that PC not only downregulated the expression of numerous genes associated with cell proliferation but also downregulated the expression of many genes associated with angiogenesis. These findings indicate that PC is potentially an antisynovial hyperplasia agent. PTGS2/Cox-2 is a molecular target for the management of arthritis pain and inflammation [39, 40]. The strong downregulation of PTGS2/Cox-2 by PC suggests that PC may have some effect on the pain associated with OA. This potential effect of PC on pain is further supported by the finding that PC significantly downregulated the expression of TACR1 (−4.39-fold change) and SRC (−3.95-fold change) (Table 1). TACR1 is a G protein-coupled receptor which is upregulated in the joint tissues of patients with painful OA [41]. SRC, a tyrosine kinase, plays a role in substance P signaling which has been implicated in many inflammatory diseases [42, 43]. These findings together indicate that PC is potentially an analgesic agent. In this study, we demonstrated that PC strongly downregulated the expression of many genes classified in cytokine- and chemokine-mediated signal pathway, including IL1R1, CCL2, and CCR1. IL-1β is a main inflammatory cytokine found within OA joints and represents one of the possible treatment targets. CCL2 is a small chemokine which recruits leukocytes to synovial inflammation site and is central to the development of pain and inflammation associated with OA [44]. The findings presented in this study indicate that PC may inhibit inflammatory cell activation and infiltration and that PC is potentially an anti-inflammator agent. We also demonstrated that PC downregulated the expression of plasminogen activator, urokinase (PLAU, −2.21-fold change), PLAU receptor (PLAUR, −1.92-fold change), early growth response 1 (EGR-1, −2.25-fold change), v-fos FBJ murine osteosarcoma viral oncogene homolog (FOS, −1.65-fold change), and FOS-like antigen 1 (FOSL1, −1.87-fold change). PLAU is a serine protease which catalyzes the conversion of inactive zymogen plasminogen to active protease plasmin when binding to its receptor PLAUR. Plasmin is capable of degrading all the components of the extracellular matrix and activating other enzymes such as MMPs. Higher levels of PLAU and PLAUR were detected in arthritic specimens [45-47]. EGR-1, FOS, and FOSL1 are involved in FLSs activation and implicated in the pathogenesis of RA [48-50]. The downregulation of these genes by PC supports the hypothesis that PC is potentially a disease-modifying drug for OA therapy. Interestingly, PC upregulated the expression of many genes classified in muscle and skeletal tissue development, including IGFBP5. Previous studies demonstrated that inhibition of IGFBP5 proteolysis improved the joint architecture and reduced articular cartilage loss in a dog model of OA [51-53]. The strong upregulation of IGFBP5 by PC is clearly consistent with the notion that PC is potentially a disease-modifying drug for OA therapy. Moreover, PC upregulated the expression of ACAN (1.80-fold change), COL1A1 (1.66-fold change), COL1A2 (1.88-fold change), COL3A1 (1.83-fold change), COL11A1 (1.50-fold change), and COL12A2 (1.93-fold change), indicating that PC may improve the integrity of synovial tissues. Surprisingly, PC upregulated the expression of MMP3 (3.18-fold change) and ADAM metallopeptidase with thrombospondin type 1 motif 5 (ADAMTS5; 3.32-fold change) (Table 2). The upregulation of both extracellular matrix proteins and extracellular matrix protein-degrading enzymes by PC indicates that PC may promote synovial tissue repair and regeneration. The implication of this specific effect on the disease process of OA is unclear at present.

5. Conclusions

PC is potentially an antisynovial hyperplasia, analgesic and anti-inflammator agent. PC is not only a promising disease-modifying drug for crystal-associated OA but also a promising disease-modifying drug for noncrystal-associated OA. The findings presented in this study provide further support for the development of PC, and/or its analogues, as disease-modifying drugs for OA therapy.
  52 in total

1.  [Localization of the neurokinin 1 receptor in hip joints of patients with painful osteoarthritis].

Authors:  G Saxler; F Löer; M von Knoch; F von Knoch; U Hanesch
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

2.  The high prevalence of pathologic calcium crystals in pre-operative knees.

Authors:  Beth A Derfus; Jason B Kurian; Jeffrey J Butler; Laureen J Daft; Guillermo F Carrera; Lawrence M Ryan; Ann K Rosenthal
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Inhibition of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 proteolysis in articular cartilage and joint fluid results in enhanced concentrations of insulin-like growth factor 1 and is associated with improved osteoarthritis.

Authors:  David R Clemmons; Walker H Busby; Aaron Garmong; Duane R Schultz; David S Howell; Roy D Altman; Robert Karr
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2002-03

4.  Quantification of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) mRNA: development and validation of an internally standardised competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  M Pfaffl; H H Meyer; H Sauerwein
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.949

Review 5.  Counterpoint: Hydroxyapatite crystal deposition is not intimately involved in the pathogenesis and progression of human osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Kenneth P H Pritzker
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 6.  The role of substance P in inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Terence M O'Connor; Joseph O'Connell; Darren I O'Brien; Triona Goode; Charles P Bredin; Fergus Shanahan
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.384

7.  Calcium deposition in osteoarthritic meniscus and meniscal cell culture.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; David R Mauerhan; Patrick R Honeycutt; Jeffrey S Kneisl; H James Norton; Natalia Zinchenko; Edward N Hanley; Helen E Gruber
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  The effects of bone remodeling inhibition by alendronate on three-dimensional microarchitecture of subchondral bone tissues in guinea pig primary osteoarthrosis.

Authors:  Ming Ding; Carl Christian Danielsen; Ivan Hvid
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.333

9.  Hydroxyapatite crystals are a frequent finding in osteoarthritic synovial fluid, but are not related to increased concentrations of keratan sulfate or interleukin 1 beta.

Authors:  G J Carroll; R A Stuart; J A Armstrong; P D Breidahl; B A Laing
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 4.666

10.  CCR2 chemokine receptor signaling mediates pain in experimental osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Rachel E Miller; Phuong B Tran; Rosalina Das; Nayereh Ghoreishi-Haack; Dongjun Ren; Richard J Miller; Anne-Marie Malfait
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  7 in total

1.  Disease-modifying effects of phosphocitrate and phosphocitrate-β-ethyl ester on partial meniscectomy-induced osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; Nikkole Haines; Andrea Roberts; Michael Ruffolo; David R Mauerhan; Kim L Mihalko; Jane Ingram; Michael Cox; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Expression of phosphocitrate-targeted genes in osteoarthritis menisci.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; David R Mauerhan; Nury M Steuerwald; Jane Ingram; Jeffrey S Kneisl; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Sodium Thiosulfate Prevents Chondrocyte Mineralization and Reduces the Severity of Murine Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Sonia Nasi; Hang-Korng Ea; Frédéric Lioté; Alexander So; Nathalie Busso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Biological Effects of Phosphocitrate on Osteoarthritic Articular Chondrocytes.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; Atiya M Franklin; David R Mauerhan; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Open Rheumatol J       Date:  2017-05-31

5.  An animal model study on the gene expression profile of meniscal degeneration.

Authors:  Yehan Fang; Hui Huang; Gang Zhou; Qinghua Wang; Feng Gao; Chunbao Li; Yujie Liu; Jianping Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Biological activities of phosphocitrate: a potential meniscal protective agent.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; Andrea Roberts; David R Mauerhan; Andrew R Sun; H James Norton; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  The role of inhibition by phosphocitrate and its analogue in chondrocyte differentiation and subchondral bone advance in Hartley guinea pigs.

Authors:  Yubo Sun; Alex J Kiraly; Michael Cox; David R Mauerhan; Edward N Hanley
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.447

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.