Literature DB >> 23555039

Plant and fungal diversity in gut microbiota as revealed by molecular and culture investigations.

Nina Gouba1, Didier Raoult, Michel Drancourt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies describing eukaryotic communities in the human gut microbiota have been published. The objective of this study was to investigate comprehensively the repertoire of plant and fungal species in the gut microbiota of an obese patient. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: A stool specimen was collected from a 27-year-old Caucasian woman with a body mass index of 48.9 who was living in Marseille, France. Plant and fungal species were identified using a PCR-based method incorporating 25 primer pairs specific for each eukaryotic phylum and universal eukaryotic primers targeting 18S rRNA, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and a chloroplast gene. The PCR products amplified using these primers were cloned and sequenced. Three different culture media were used to isolate fungi, and these cultured fungi were further identified by ITS sequencing. A total of 37 eukaryotic species were identified, including a Diatoms (Blastocystis sp.) species, 18 plant species from the Streptophyta phylum and 18 fungal species from the Ascomycota, Basidiomycota and Chytridiocomycota phyla. Cultures yielded 16 fungal species, while PCR-sequencing identified 7 fungal species. Of these 7 species of fungi, 5 were also identified by culture. Twenty-one eukaryotic species were discovered for the first time in human gut microbiota, including 8 fungi (Aspergillus flavipes, Beauveria bassiana, Isaria farinosa, Penicillium brevicompactum, Penicillium dipodomyicola, Penicillium camemberti, Climacocystis sp. and Malassezia restricta). Many fungal species apparently originated from food, as did 11 plant species. However, four plant species (Atractylodes japonica, Fibraurea tinctoria, Angelica anomala, Mitella nuda) are used as medicinal plants.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Investigating the eukaryotic components of gut microbiota may help us to understand their role in human health.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23555039      PMCID: PMC3598745          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The human gut contains a wide variety of microorganisms known as the microbiota [1]. At birth, the human gut is sterile and is then colonized by bacteria originating from the mother, environment and diet [2], [3]. Several studies have revealed the importance of gut microbiota in host health and the contribution of these microbes to diverse functions, including metabolism, immune function and gene expression [4]. Gut microbes produce a large arsenal of enzymes that are naturally absent from humans, which contribute to food digestion, energy harvesting and storage [5], [6]. Two bacterial phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes, dominate in the gut microbiota. Some studies have shown a reduction in the relative proportion of Bacteroidetes in obese individuals compared to lean individuals [5], [7]. Additionally, it has been observed that the microbiota of obese individuals extract more energy from the diet than the microbiota of lean individuals [1]. The gut microbiota is comprised of Viruses, Bacteria, Archaea and Eukaryotes [8]. Accordingly, there are much data available about the bacterial community. However, few studies have investigated eukaryotic communities in the human gut, resulting in a dearth of information about these communities. Previous studies that have used molecular methods to explore the eukaryotic community in the guts of healthy individuals detected only Galactomyces and Candida fungi and Blastocystis hominis as prevalent species [9], [10]. Additional studies have reported increased fungal diversity in ill patients compared to healthy individuals [11]–[13]. Thus, our study aimed to examine the repertoire of plants and fungi in the gut of an obese human using both PCR-sequencing and culturing techniques.

Results

Molecular Detection

Mixing Acanthamoeba castellanii DNA and stool DNA yielded a positive amplification using specific primer pair for Acanthamoeaba (JPD1/JDP2). Among the 25 primers pairs, 17 yielded an exact sequence with an appropriate positive control, whereas no positive control was available for 8 primer pairs (Table 1 & Table 2). Only 5 of these 25 eukaryotic PCRs yielded amplification product with the stool specimen, while the negative controls exhibited no amplification. The analysis of a total of 408 clones identified 7 fungal species, 18 plant species and one Diatoms (Blastocystis sp.) species (Table 3). GenBank reference number of the best hit similarly to our sequences for each organism were: Galactomyces geotrichum (JN903644.1); Penicillium camemberti (GQ458039.1), Malassezia globosa (AY743604.1), Malassezia pachydermatis(AB118940.1), Malassezia restricta (AY743607.1), uncultured Chytridiomycota (GQ995333.1) Candida tropicalis (DQ515959.1).
Table 1

Eukaryotic and fungi primers selected in this study.

TaxonPrimerTargetPCR productsize (bp)Annealing temperatureand number of cyclesReference
Amoeba AmiF1/Ami9R18S rRNA67055°C 30 s 40cyles [47]
AcanthamoebaJDP1/JDP218S rRNA460–47060°C 60 s 40cylces [48]
Entamoeba JVF/DSPR218S rRNA662–66755°C 60 s 40cycles [49]
Hartmanella HV1227F/HV1728R18S rRNA50256°C 30 s 40cycles [50]
Naegleria F/RITS376–38855°C 30 s 35cycles [51]
Ciliophora 121F/1147R18S750–100055°C 60 s 30cycles [52]
Chlorophyta UCP1F/UCP1RRsp11-rpl238454°C 60 s 35cyles [53]
UCP2F/UCP2RRsp11-rpl239156°C 60 S 35cycles
Diatoms 18S/28R18s-28srRNA700–90060°C 30 s 35cycles [54]
Dinoflagellate 18ScomF1/Dino18SR118S rRNA65058°C 60 s 40cycles [55]
Diplomonads DimA/DimB18S rRNA [56]
Euglenophyta EAF/EAF318S rRNA100062°C 90 s 25cycles [57]
Kinetoplastidia Kinetokin1/kinetokin218S rRNA600–65056°C 60 s 35cycles [58]
KinSSUF1/KinSSUR118S rRNA427–60060°C 60 s 35cycles [59]
Microsporidia V1/PMP218S rRNA250–27955°C 30 s 35cycles [60]
Rodhophyta URP1_F/URP1_Rrps10-dnaK46452°C 60 s 35cyles [53]
URP2_F/URP2_Rrps10-dnaK177252°C 60 s 35cyles
Trichomonads TFR1/TFR25,8SrNRA, ITS338–39160°C 30 s 35cycles [61]
Fungi MalF/MALR26S58055°C 45 s 40cycles [62]
Fungi NS1/FR118S rRNA165048°C 45 s 35cycles [63]
ITS1F/ITS4RITSVariable50°C45 s 40cycles [9]
Fungi FunF/funR18S100052°C30 s 40cycles [12]
Universal Euk1A/EUK516r18S56050°C 30 s 35cycles [9]
eukaryote EUK528/1391R18S1000–130055°C 60 s 30cylces [64]
Plant rbcLZ1/rbcL19bChloroplast15740°C30 s 40 cycles [16]
Table 2

Results of PCR testing with positive control. NA non available.

TaxonPrimersPositive controlPCRBlast coverage%Blast identity %GenBank refence number
Amoeba AmiF1/Ami9R Acanthamoeba castellanii Positive10099 A.castellani (GU001160.1)
Hartmannella vermiformis Positive10099 H. vermiformi (DQ123623.2)
Acanthamoeba JDP1/JDP2 Acanthamoeba castellanii Positive10099 A. castellanii (GU001160.1)
Entamoeba JVF/DSPR2NA
Hartmannella Hv1227F/Hv1728R Hartmannella vermiformis Positive10099 H. vermiformis (HM363627)
Naegleria F/RNA
Ciliophora 121 F/1147R Colpoda steinii Positive10099 C. steineii (DQ388599.1)
Chlorophyta UCP1F/UCP1R Chlorella vulgaris Positive9593 C. vulagaris (AB001684.1)
Chlorophyta UCP2F/UCP2R Chlorella vulgaris Positive9593 C. vulagaris (AB001684.1)
Diatoms 18S/28RNA
Dinoflagellates DinocomF1/Dino18SR1 Poterioochromonas malhamensis Positive10098 P. malhamensis (FN662745.1)
Diplomonads DimA/DimBNA
Euglenophyta EAF/EAF3NA
Kinetoplastidia Kinetokin1/kinetokin2 Leshmania major Positive9999 L. major (FN677342.1)
Kinetoplastidia KinSSUF1/KinSSUR1 Leshmania major Positive9999 L. major (FN677342.1)
Microsporidia V1/PMP2 Encephalitozoon hellem Positive10099 E. hellem (AF039229.1)
Rhodophyta URP1F/URP1RNA
Rhodophyta URP2F/URP2RNA
Trichomonads TFR1/TFR2NA
Fungi MalF/MalR Malassezia restricta Posisitve10098 M. restricta (JN980105)
Fungi ITS1F/ITS4R Candida albicans Posisitve10099 C. albicans (L28817.1)
Fungi NSR1/FR1 Candida albicans Positive10099 C. albicans (JN940588.1)
Fungi FunF/FunR Candida albicans Positive10099 C. albicans (JN940588.1)
Universal Eukaryoteseuk528F/1391R Acanthamoeba castellanii Positive9899 A. castellanii (GU001160.1)
Euk1A/Euk516r Acanthamoeba castellanii Positive10099 A. castellanii (GU001160.1)
Chloroplast PlantrbcLZ1/rbcL19b Solanum sp.Positive9894 S. physalifolium (HQ23562)
Table 3

Sequencing results on PCR products from clones.

PrimersclonesSequences of SpeciesBlast Identity% and coverage%Kingdom
ITS1F/ITS4R7596% Galactomyces geotrichum 99 and 99Fungi
4% Penicillium camemberti 99 and 99Fungi
MalFMalR57 28.07% Malassezia pachydermatis 92 and 100Fungi
17.54% Malassezia restricta 100 and 99Fungi
54.4% Malassezia globosa 99 and 99Fungi
EUK1A/EUK516r10420.4% Blastocyctis sp.99 and 99Protist
0.96% Uncultured Chytridiomycota 95 and 99Fungi
0.96% Fibraurea tinctoria 98 and 100Plant
1.9% Allium victorialis 98 and 100Plant
3% Nicotiana tabacum 99 and 99Plant
0.96% Helianthus annuus 96 and 100Plant
0.96% Caprifoliaceae environmental 98 and 99Plant
0.96% Petrophile canescens 98 and 99Plant
60% Solanum lycopersicum 99 and 99Plant
5% Humulus lupulus 98 and 100Plant
3% Cicer arietinum 99 and 98Plant
0.96% Pinus wallichiana 100 and 98Plant
0.96% Mitella nuda 100 and 98Plant
JVF/DSPR2 141 94.32% Galactomyces geotrichum 98 and 99Fungi
0.71% Candida tropicalis 98 and 99Fungi
0.71% Citrus aurantium 99 and 100plant
4.25% Atractylodes Japonica 98 and 99Plant
0.71% Pinus wallichiana 99 and 100Plant
78% Nicotiana undulate 98 and 99Plant
rbcLZ1/rbcL19b 31 3% Musa acuminata/Ensete ventricosum 99 and 99Plant
6.25% Lactuca sativa 99 and 99Plant
3% Solanum tuberosum 100 and 99Plant
3% Brassica napus/Arabidopsis lyrata 100 and 99Plant
6.25% Angelica anomala/Davidia involucrata/Aucuba japonica 100 and 99Plant

Fungi Isolated Using Culture Media

In all experiments, the negative control plates remained sterile. A total 16 different fungal species were isolated (Table 4). Nine species of fungi (M. globosa, M. restricta, M. pachydermatis, Penicillium allii, Penicillium dipodomyicola, G. geotrichum, Cladosporidium sp., Climacocystis sp. and C. tropicalis) were cultured on Dixon agar medium. Three species of fungi (Penicillium sp./P. commune/P. camemberti, Aspergillus versicolor, Beauveria bassiana) were cultured on Potato Dextrose media. Two species of fungi (Aspergillus flavipes, Isaria farinosa) were cultured on CZAPEK medium. Two species (Hypocrea lixii/Penicillium chrysogenum , Penicillium brevicompactum) were cultured on both PDA and CZAPEK media, and C. tropicalis was cultured on both Dixon agar and PDA media. Five of the cultured species of fungi (G. geotrichum, C. tropicalis, M. pachydermatis, M. globosa, and M. restricta) were also identified by clone sequencing, while 11 fungi were detected only by culture (Figure 1). Penicillium, Aspergillus, Galactomyces, Beauveria, Candida, Cladosporidium, and Isaria are members of the Ascomycota phylum and Malassezia and Climacocystis are members of the Basidiomycota phylum.
Table 4

Fungi cultured using different culture media.

PCR ITS from cultured fungi% Coverage and % IdentityMedia for culture
Penicillium sp./P. camemberti 99 and 100PDA
Hypocrea lixii/Penicillium chrysogenum 99 and 98PDA/CZAPEK
Penicillium brevicompactum 95 and 97PDA/CZAPEK
Penicillium allii 99 and 99Dixon agar
Penicillium dipodomyicola 99 and 100Dixon agar
Aspergillus flavipes 100 and 99CZAPEK
Aspergillus versicolor 100 and 99PDA
Beauveria bassiana 99 and 99PDA
Isaria farinosa 97 and 98CZAPEK
Galactomyces geotrichum 100 and 100Dixon agar
Malassezia globosa 100 and 99Dixon agar
Malassezia restricta 100 and 99Dixon agar
Malassezia pachydermatis 100 and 93Dixon agar
Candida tropicalis 99 and 100Dixon agar/PDA
Cladosporium sp.100 and 99Dixon agar
Climacocystis sp.98 and 96Dixon agar
Figure 1

Eukaryotes detected by PCR and culture. Lines connect species found by the two methods.

(green color represents plant, red are fungi, pink color are protozoan, purple color are fungi identified by two methods).

Eukaryotes detected by PCR and culture. Lines connect species found by the two methods.

(green color represents plant, red are fungi, pink color are protozoan, purple color are fungi identified by two methods).

Discussion

The PCR-based and culture-based results obtained here are validated by the fact that all the negative controls remained negative, precluding the possibility of cross contamination from the laboratory. Also, we ensured the absence of potential PCR inhibitors in the stool specimen. At last, the PCR systems yielded expected result with appropriate positive controls including Fungi which have been shown to be diffult to lyse [14]. Accordingly, we combined mechanical and enzymatic lysis to optimize recovery of DNA from Fungi as previously reported [9], [14]–[15]. These data allowed to interpret negative results as true negatives. The 18S rRNA, ITS and chloroplast genes amplified in this study are molecular markers commonly used for eukaryotic screening [11], [16]–[22]. These genes are conserved in all eukaryotes and contain variable regions suitable for primer design. However, this is the first study to use a multiple set of primers for molecular approach to screen eukaryotic communities in a stool sample from an obese person. The combination of culture-dependent and culture-independent cloning and sequencing revealed a previously unsuspected diversity of eukaryotes among the human intestinal microbiota. Indeed, we detected a total of 37 eukaryotic species; only 16 of these species had been previously reported to be present in the gut microbiota. Interestingly, the culturing of the sample in using only three different culture media identified more than twice the fungal species than did the different PCR-based molecular methods (Table 5). Accordingly, culturing yielded A. flavipes, P. brevicompactum, B. bassiana, P. dipodomyicola, M. restricta, Climacocystis sp. and I. farisona, which have not been previously detected in human stool samples. This result differs from previous studies that cultured only one or two Candida spp. and Saccharomyces spp. from healthy individuals [9]–[12]. Our culture conditions were different from those used by Scanlan and Chen [9], [12], as we incubated our cultures at 25°C for two weeks. We also did not use the same medium as Khatib [23]. Our use of Dixon medium allowed us to isolate a wide variety of fungi (9 species). Our results can be explained by our subject’s obese status; it is possible that obese individuals harbor more fungi. Most of the fungi (11 species) identified in our study are known to be associated with dietary sources. In particular, G. geotrichum and P. camemberti are used as starters for the production of many cheeses [24]–[25]. Accordingly, G. geotrichum has been commonly reported in human stool samples [9]–[12]. P. brevicompactum, which was also identified in our study, has been previously reported to be part of the oral microbiome in healthy individuals, but it has not been identified among the gut microbiota [26]. P. brevicompactum is frequently isolated from smoked dry-cured hams [27]. The P. dipodomyicola species that was identified in this study has also been reported in food [28]. The A. flavipes and P. allii species are usually found to be associated with cereal grains [29]–[31]. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to report the presence of this species in a stool sample from an obese individual using a culture-dependent method. The A. versicolor species found in this stool sample is an environmental airborne fungal species [32]. A. versicolor and P. chrysogenum have also been previously isolated from dry cured meat products [33]. Accordingly, previous studies have detected these species in human stool samples [11], [12]. The Cladosporidium sp. isolated from our subject’s stool sample is often found on fruit, such as grapes [34], and has been previously reported in stool samples [11].
Table 5

Cultured fungi compared to fungi detected by PCR and sequencing.

Cultured fungiPCR cloning sequencing-detected fungi
Galactomyces geotrichum Galactomyces geotrichum
Malassezia globosa Malassezia globosa
Malassezia restricta Malassezia restricta
Malassezia pachydermatis Malassezia pachydermatis
Candida tropicalis Candida tropicalis
Cladosporium sp.
Climacocystis sp.
Penicillium sp./P. camemberti P. camemberti
Hypocrea lixii/Penicillium chrysogenum
Penicillium brevicompactum
Penicillium allii
Penicillium dipodomyicola
Aspergillus flavipes
Aspergillus versicolor
Beauveria bassiana
Isaria farinosa
Uncultured Chytridiomycota
The B. bassiana and I. farisona detected in this study are entomopathogenic fungi that are used as biocontrol agents in agriculture [35], which can explain their presence in the human gut. C. tropicalis, which was also isolated from our subject’s stool sample, has commonly been reported in human stool [23], in the intestine of normal individuals (up to 30%) and in the oral microbiome of healthy individuals [36]. The Climacocystis sp. detected here is an edible fungus, which explains the detection of this fungus in this stool sample. This fungus was not found to be present in stool in previous studies. The Malassezia species isolated from our subject’s stool sample are normal flora found on the skin of 77–80% of healthy adults [37]. These species were also found in scalp skin from healthy volunteers [38]. However, M. pachydermatis and M. globosa were previously found in stool from healthy and ill subjects [12], [13] by culture-independent methods. We report for the first time the detection of M. restricta in stool by molecular methods. The Malassezia species that were detected by culture-independent methods in this study were confirmed by culture. The presence of these fungi in our subject’s stool sample could be either a contaminant from the subject’s skin or a part of human gut flora, so more investigation is needed to confirm these results. The uncultured Chytridiomycota detected in this stool sample is a member of the Chytridiomycota family (Figure 2). Some Chytridiomycota species infect potatoes and tomatoes [39], which could explain the incidence of these fungi in the human gut. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to report this species in a stool sample from an obese subject.
Figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of 18S rRNA gene sequences of uncultured Chytricomycota.

In addition to fungi, we detected 11 plant species, all of which are known to be associated with human food and traditional medicines. We identified the dietary plants Solanum lycopersicum (tomato), Allium victorialis (onion family), Solanum tuberosum (potato), Citrus aurantium (orange), Cicer arietinum, Musa acuminata/Ensete ventricosum (banana), Lactuca sativa, Humulus lupulus (hops), Pinus wallichiana. Helianthus annuus (sunflowers) and Brassica napus. The sequences of Nicotiana tabacum and Nicotiana undulate that we identified might be linked to the consumption of cigarettes by the patient. A previous study has also reported the presence of N. tabacum and C. arietinum in human stool [40]. The diversity of the plant species found in the stool sample can be explained by the patient’s diet. Because of her obesity, she may have a diet rich in plants. Some of the plant sequences found in this stool sample, such as Atractylodes japonica, Fibraurea tinctoria, Angelica anomala and Mitella nuda, are used as medicinal plants [41]. The genus Atractylodes has been found in the oral microbiome of healthy individuals [26]. The plants that we identified in this study are similar to those found in Nam’s study, which detected different plants from 10 Korean individuals [10]. We did not find the same plant species as those identified from Korean subjects because our obese subject did not have the same diet and lived in a different environment. Finally, the Blastocytis sp. that we detected is commonly found in healthy microbiota [9], [10] and is associated with irritable bowel syndrome.

Conclusions

Of 40 phyla of protists described in literature, eight phyla (Diatoms, Apicomplexa, Ciliate, Parabasalids, Fornicata, Amoebozoa, Microsporidia, Fungi) have been previouslsy detected in human gut [42]. However, most species including Gardia intestinalis (Parabasalids), Blastocystis hominis (Diatoms), Cryptosporidium parvum (Apicomplexa), Balantidium coli (ciliates), Dientamoeba fragilis (Fornicata), Entameba histolytica (Archamoeba ), Encephalitozoon intestinalis (Microsporidia) and Candida tropicalis (Fungi) have been reported in patients with digestive tract disease [42]–[44]. Here, we showed that representatives of two of these eight phyla (Fungi and Blastocystis) can be also detected in one individual without digestive tract disease. Among 19 micro-eukaryotes found in this individual, five fungal species were detected using PCR-based and culture approaches, 16 fungal species were detected by culture and eight species including seven different fungi and one Blastocystis were detected by molecular methods. Accordingly, a total of 13 plants species and eight fungi including Aspergillus flavipes, Beauveria bassiana, Isaria farinosa, Penicillium brevicompactum, Penicillium dipodomyicola, Penicillium camemberti, Climacocystis sp. and Malassezia restricta were detected for the first time in the human gut microbiota. These data illustrate that eukaryotes have to be searched in the digestive tract using a combined approach and that culture must be kept as a key approach. As a a single stool sample was used herein, results here reported constitute a baseline for futher studies to assess eukaryotic diversity in healthy and diseased individuals from various geographical origins.

Materials and Methods

Fecal Sample Collection

One stool specimen was collected in a sterile plastic container from a 27-year-old Caucasian woman, who weighed 120 kg with a body mass index (BMI) of 48. 9 and lived in Marseille, France. After collecting the stool sample, 1 g aliquots were preserved in sterile microtubes stored at −80°C until use. The patient provided her written consent to participate in the study, and the agreement of the local ethics committee of the IFR48 was obtained (agreement number 09-022, Marseille, France). The subject did not take antibiotic or antifungal treatments in the month prior to the stool collection, but we were not given information about her diet.

DNA Extraction

DNA was extracted using the Qiamp® stool mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) as has been previously described [9]. Briefly, 200 mg of stool was placed in a 2-mL tube containing a 200 mg mixture of 0.1–0.5 mm glass beads and 1.5-mL of lysis buffer (ASL) (Qiagen). Mechanical lysis was performed by bead-beating the mixture using a FastPrep BIO 101 apparatus (Qbiogene, Strasbourg, France) at level 4.5 (full speed) for 90 s. A minor modification was made to the manufacturer’s procedure by increasing the proteinase K incubation time to 2 h at 70°C. For all DNA extractions, 200 µL of distilled water was used as a negative control. The extracted DNA was stored at −20°C until use.

PCR Amplification

A total of 25 eukaryotic primer pairs for PCR were selected from the literature and used to amplify the 18S rRNA gene, internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and a chloroplast gene (Table 1). Each set of primers was blasted against corresponding taxa of each phylum in nucleotide BLAST program from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) to test its ability to amplify the corresponding phylum. The sets of primers for were selected on the basis of a 100% coverage and a 100% identity shown by at least one of the primer from a set. Primers which yielded negative PCR were tested using positive controls specific for each phylum (Table 2). For each eukaryotic primer pair, the 50 µL PCR reaction mixture contained 5 µL of dNTPs (2 mM of each nucleotide), 5 µL of DNA polymerase buffer (Qiagen) 2 µl of MgCL2 (25 mM), 0.25 µL HotStarTaq DNA polymerase (1.25 U) (Qiagen), 1 µL of each primer (Eurogentec, Liège, Belgium) and 5 µl of DNA. PCR was performed with a 15 min initial denaturation at 95°C followed by cycles of 95°C for 30 sec. The initial extension was performed at 72°C for 1 min, and the 5 min final extension was performed at 72°C. The annealing temperature and the number of cycles used for each primer are presented in Table 1. All PCRs were performed using the 2720 thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Saint Aubin, France). A reaction made up of buffer without DNA was used as a negative control for each PCR run. Amplified products were visualized with ethidium bromide staining after electrophoresis using a 1.5% agarose gel. The PCR products were purified using the Nucleo- Fast® 96 PCR Kit (Marcherey-Nagel, Hoerdt, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To test for potential PCR inhibitors, 1 µl of A. castellanii was added to 4 µl of stool DNA prior to PCR amplification.

Cloning and Sequencing

PCR products were cloned separately using the pGEM® -T Easy Vector System Kit (Promega, Lyon, France) as described by the manufacturer. The presence of the insert was confirmed by PCR amplification using M13 forward (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAG-3′) and M13 reverse (5′-AGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′) primers (Eurogenetec) and an annealing temperature of 58°C. PCRs were performed as described above. Purified PCR products were sequenced in both directions using the Big Dye® Terminator V1.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Villebon-sur-Yvette, France) with the M13 forward and M13 reverse primers. These products were run on an ABI PRISM 3130 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Eukaryotes were identified by comparing our obtained sequences with the sequences in the GenBank database using BLAST. The sequence alignments were performed using the clustalw algorithm for multiple sequence alignments (http://npsa-pbil.ibcp.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_clustalwan.html). Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the Mega version 5 bootstrap kimura2-parameter model [45].

Fungi Culture and Identification

One gram of stool was diluted in 9 mL of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and a six-fold serial dilution from 10−1 to 10−6 was prepared in PBS. Each dilution was spread in duplicate on potato dextrose agar (PDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France), Czapeck dox agar (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05 g/l) and gentamycin (0.1 g/l), and Dixon agar [46] supplemented with chloramphenicol (0.05 mg/mL) and cycloheximide (0.2 mg/mL). Dixon agar medium was prepared by adding 1 L of distilled water to a mixture of 36 g of malt extract, 6 g of peptone, 20 g of ox bile, 10 mL of Tween 40, 2 mL of glycerol, 2 mL of oleic acid and 12 g of agar (Sigma-Aldrich). The mixture was heated to boiling to dissolve all components, autoclaved (20 min at 121°C) and cooled to approximately 50°C. Agar plates made from this media were placed in plastic bags with humid gas to prevent desiccation and incubated aerobically at room temperature (∼25°C) in the dark. The Dixon Agar medium plates were incubated aerobically at 30°C. Growth was observed for two weeks. The solution used for dilution of the sample was spread on the same media and incubated in the same conditions as a negative control. DNA extracted from colonies as described above was amplified with the fungal primers ITS 1F/ITS 4R and MalF/Mal R. The purified PCR products were submitted to direct sequencing using the ITS1R/ITS4 and MalF/Mal R primers with the Big Dye® Terminator V1,1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems) as described above. When the peaks of the sequence overlapped, the amplicons were cloned as described above. All sequences superior to 200 base pairs are available in GenBank with reference number (KC143356–KC143757).
  59 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiology of opportunistic invasive mycoses.

Authors:  B J Kullberg; A M L Oude Lashof
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2002-05-31       Impact factor: 2.175

Review 2.  Protozoan infections of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Stephen G Wright
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.982

3.  Development of a dinoflagellate-oriented PCR primer set leads to detection of picoplanktonic dinoflagellates from Long Island Sound.

Authors:  Senjie Lin; Huan Zhang; Yubo Hou; Lilibeth Miranda; Debashish Bhattacharya
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Discovering potential pathogens among fungi identified as nonsporulating molds.

Authors:  June I Pounder; Keith E Simmon; Claudia A Barton; Sheri L Hohmann; Mary E Brandt; Cathy A Petti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  A multiple PCR-primer approach to access the microeukaryotic diversity in environmental samples.

Authors:  Thorsten Stoeck; Brett Hayward; Gordon T Taylor; Ramon Varela; Slava S Epstein
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2006-01-23

Review 6.  Diversity of the human gastrointestinal tract microbiota revisited.

Authors:  Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović; Hauke Smidt; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 7.  Obesity and the microbiota.

Authors:  Herbert Tilg; Alexander R Moschen; Arthur Kaser
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Low occurrence of patulin- and citrinin-producing species isolated from grapes.

Authors:  M R Bragulat; M L Abarca; F J Cabañes
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.858

9.  Differential identification of Entamoeba spp. based on the analysis of 18S rRNA.

Authors:  Helena Lúcia Carneiro Santos; Rebecca Bandea; Luci Ana Fernandes Martins; Heloisa Werneck de Macedo; Regina Helena Saramago Peralta; Jose Mauro Peralta; Mackevin I Ndubuisi; Alexandre J da Silva
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.289

10.  Obesity-associated gut microbiota is enriched in Lactobacillus reuteri and depleted in Bifidobacterium animalis and Methanobrevibacter smithii.

Authors:  M Million; M Maraninchi; M Henry; F Armougom; H Richet; P Carrieri; R Valero; D Raccah; B Vialettes; D Raoult
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 5.095

View more
  32 in total

1.  Analysis of the Microbial Diversity in the Fecal Material of Giraffes.

Authors:  Jessica M Schmidt; Susan Henken; Scot E Dowd; Richard William McLaughlin
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 2.  Fungi in the healthy human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Heather E Hallen-Adams; Mallory J Suhr
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 5.882

Review 3.  The first 1000 cultured species of the human gastrointestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Mirjana Rajilić-Stojanović; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 16.408

Review 4.  The Host Microbiome Regulates and Maintains Human Health: A Primer and Perspective for Non-Microbiologists.

Authors:  Sunil Thomas; Jacques Izard; Emily Walsh; Kristen Batich; Pakawat Chongsathidkiet; Gerard Clarke; David A Sela; Alexander J Muller; James M Mullin; Korin Albert; John P Gilligan; Katherine DiGuilio; Rima Dilbarova; Walker Alexander; George C Prendergast
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Mycobiome Profiles in Breast Milk from Healthy Women Depend on Mode of Delivery, Geographic Location, and Interaction with Bacteria.

Authors:  Alba Boix-Amorós; Fernando Puente-Sánchez; Elloise du Toit; Kaisa M Linderborg; Yumei Zhang; Baoru Yang; Seppo Salminen; Erika Isolauri; Javier Tamames; Alex Mira; Maria Carmen Collado
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Fungi in Gastrointestinal Tracts of Human and Mice: from Community to Functions.

Authors:  Jiayan Li; Daiwen Chen; Bing Yu; Jun He; Ping Zheng; Xiangbing Mao; Jie Yu; Junqiu Luo; Gang Tian; Zhiqing Huang; Yuheng Luo
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Dysbiosis of fungal microbiota in the intestinal mucosa of patients with colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Chunguang Luan; Lingling Xie; Xi Yang; Huifang Miao; Na Lv; Ruifen Zhang; Xue Xiao; Yongfei Hu; Yulan Liu; Na Wu; Yuanmin Zhu; Baoli Zhu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Gut microeukaryotes during anorexia nervosa: a case report.

Authors:  Nina Gouba; Didier Raoult; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2014-01-13

9.  Diverse and widespread contamination evident in the unmapped depths of high throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Richard W Lusk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Eukaryote culturomics of the gut reveals new species.

Authors:  Nina Gouba; Didier Raoult; Michel Drancourt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.