| Literature DB >> 23554848 |
Hongyan Sun1, Andrew Lau, Young C Heo, Lianshan Lin, Ralph Delong, Alex Fok.
Abstract
A preliminary study was conducted on the development of an intelligent dental handpiece with functionality to detect subtle changes in mechanical properties of tooth tissue during milling. Such equipment would be able to adopt changes in cutting parameters and make real-time measurements to avoid tooth tissue damage caused by overexertion and overextension of the cutting tool. A modified dental handpiece, instrumented with strain gauges, microphone, displacement sensor, and air pressure sensor, was mounted to a linear movement table and used to mill three to four cavities in >50 bovine teeth. Extracted sound frequency and density were analyzed along with force, air pressure, and displacement for correlations and trends. Experimental results showed a high correlation (coefficient close to 0.7) between the feed force, the rotational frequency, and the averaged gray scale. These results could form the basis of a feedback control system to improve the safety of dental cutting procedures. This article is written in memory of Dr Hongyan Sun, who passed away in 2011 at a young age of 37.Entities:
Keywords: Dental handpiece; cavity preparation; correlation coefficient; feed force; rotational frequency
Year: 2013 PMID: 23554848 PMCID: PMC3608217 DOI: 10.1177/1758736013483747
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Dent Biomech ISSN: 1758-7360
Figure 1.Apparatus setup: (a) tooth sample mounted in a Teflon ring using orthodontic resin and (b) system diagram of the experimental setup.
Figure 2.Procedure of modifying the handpiece into a force transducer.
Figure 3.Images of the tooth with three slots: (a) parallel slots made on the flattened tooth sample and (b) micro-CT image of the horizontal cross-section.
micro-CT: micro-computed tomography.
Figure 4(a) Feed force and rotational frequency versus bur displacement and (b) feed force versus rotational frequency.
Figure 5.(a) Feed force and tissue gray scale versus bur displacement and (b) feed force versus average gray scale.
Figure 6.(a) Rotational frequency and averaged gray scale versus bur displacement and (b) averaged gray scale versus rotational frequency.