Literature DB >> 23554443

Utilizing experience-based co-design to improve the experience of patients accessing emergency departments in New South Wales public hospitals: an evaluation study.

Donella Piper1, Rick Iedema, Jane Gray, Raj Verma, Lee Holmes, Nicole Manning.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper presents the findings of three multisite evaluations of Experience-Based Co-design (EBCD) programmes conducted in Emergency Departments (EDs) and associated departments in seven public hospitals in New South Wales, Australia.
METHOD: Data for the evaluations were derived from: EBCD documentation provided by the participating sites; interviews with 117 key informants; performance data and the policy and academic literature on EBCD.
RESULTS: Respondents described EBCD as a successful and sustainable method of improving the individual patient experience and the overall quality of a health service. Demonstrated successes were reported to lead to aspects of the EBCD approach spreading within services. However, like any quality improvement activity, EBCD was not without its challenges. The principal challenge particular to the EBCD projects outlined here was their deployment in ED settings. Because of their ambulant patient populations, these settings made sustaining consumer engagement for the duration of the project problematic and required tailoring EBCD to accommodate consumers' involvement preferences and constraints.
CONCLUSION: The primary strength of EBCD over and above other service development methodologies was reported to be its ability to bring about improvements simultaneously in both the operational efficiency and the inter-personal dynamics of care. However, careful consideration must be given to the constraints inherent in transient patient specialties and what needs to be done to tailor EBCD to suit the particular setting in which it is deployed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23554443     DOI: 10.1177/0951484812474247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res        ISSN: 0951-4848


  16 in total

1.  Response to: 'A 'work smarter, not harder' approach to improving healthcare quality' by Hayes et al.

Authors:  Glenn Robert; Sara Donetto
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 7.035

2.  The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting.

Authors:  Victoria J Palmer; Patty Chondros; Donella Piper; Rosemary Callander; Wayne Weavell; Kali Godbee; Maria Potiriadis; Lauralie Richard; Konstancja Densely; Helen Herrman; John Furler; David Pierce; Tibor Schuster; Rick Iedema; Jane Gunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Tailored educational intervention for primary care to improve the management of dementia: the EVIDEM-ED cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jane Wilcock; Steve Iliffe; Mark Griffin; Priya Jain; Ingela Thuné-Boyle; Frances Lefford; David Rapp
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  A co-design process developing heuristics for practitioners providing end of life care for people with dementia.

Authors:  Nathan Davies; Rammya Mathew; Jane Wilcock; Jill Manthorpe; Elizabeth L Sampson; Kethakie Lamahewa; Steve Iliffe
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  Improving the care pathway for women who request Caesarean section: an experience-based co-design study.

Authors:  Sara L Kenyon; Nina Johns; Sandhya Duggal; Ruth Hewston; Nicola Gale
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Group clinics for young adults with diabetes in an ethnically diverse, socioeconomically deprived setting (TOGETHER study): protocol for a realist review, co-design and mixed methods, participatory evaluation of a new care model.

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papoutsi; Dougal Hargreaves; Grainne Colligan; Ann Hagell; Anita Patel; Desirée Campbell-Richards; Russell M Viner; Shanti Vijayaraghavan; Martin Marshall; Trisha Greenhalgh; Sarah Finer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  What outcomes are associated with developing and implementing co-produced interventions in acute healthcare settings? A rapid evidence synthesis.

Authors:  David Clarke; Fiona Jones; Ruth Harris; Glenn Robert
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Showing the Unsayable: Participatory Visual Approaches and the Constitution of 'Patient Experience' in Healthcare Quality Improvement.

Authors:  Constantina Papoulias
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2018-06

9.  Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: a systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  Eunice Wong; Felix Mavondo; Jane Fisher
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Co-design and implementation research: challenges and solutions for ethics committees.

Authors:  Felicity Goodyear-Smith; Claire Jackson; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.