Literature DB >> 23554402

The potential of tissue engineering for developing alternatives to animal experiments: a systematic review.

Rob B M de Vries1, Marlies Leenaars1, Joppe Tra2, Robbertjan Huijbregtse2, Erik Bongers2, John A Jansen3, Bert Gordijn4, Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga1.   

Abstract

An underexposed ethical issue raised by tissue engineering is the use of laboratory animals in tissue engineering research. Even though this research results in suffering and loss of life in animals, tissue engineering also has great potential for the development of alternatives to animal experiments. With the objective of promoting a joint effort of tissue engineers and alternative experts to fully realise this potential, this study provides the first comprehensive overview of the possibilities of using tissue-engineered constructs as a replacement of laboratory animals. Through searches in two large biomedical databases (PubMed, Embase) and several specialised 3R databases, 244 relevant primary scientific articles, published between 1991 and 2011, were identified. By far most articles reviewed related to the use of tissue-engineered skin/epidermis for toxicological applications such as testing for skin irritation. This review article demonstrates, however, that the potential for the development of alternatives also extends to other tissues such as other epithelia and the liver, as well as to other fields of application such as drug screening and basic physiology. This review discusses which impediments need to be overcome to maximise the contributions that the field of tissue engineering can make, through the development of alternative methods, to the reduction of the use and suffering of laboratory animals.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal testing alternatives; ethics; in vitro test; systematic review; three Rs; tissue engineering

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23554402     DOI: 10.1002/term.1703

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  6 in total

Review 1.  The usefulness of systematic reviews of animal experiments for the design of preclinical and clinical studies.

Authors:  Rob B M de Vries; Kimberley E Wever; Marc T Avey; Martin L Stephens; Emily S Sena; Marlies Leenaars
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2014

Review 2.  A primer on systematic reviews in toxicology.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoffmann; Rob B M de Vries; Martin L Stephens; Nancy B Beck; Hubert A A M Dirven; John R Fowle; Julie E Goodman; Thomas Hartung; Ian Kimber; Manoj M Lalu; Kristina Thayer; Paul Whaley; Daniele Wikoff; Katya Tsaioun
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 5.153

3.  Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials: Part 2: Potential Alternatives to the Use of Animals in Preclinical Trials.

Authors:  Gail A Van Norman
Journal:  JACC Basic Transl Sci       Date:  2020-04-27

4.  A practical guide to preclinical systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nadia Soliman; Andrew S C Rice; Jan Vollert
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 7.926

5.  Innovative Platform for the Advanced Online Monitoring of Three-Dimensional Cells and Tissue Cultures.

Authors:  Sebastian Kreß; Roland Schaller-Ammann; Jürgen Feiel; Joachim Wegener; Joachim Priedl; Wolf Dietrich; Cornelia Kasper; Dominik Egger
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 6.600

6.  Assessing the application of the 3Rs: a survey among animal welfare officers in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Judith van Luijk; Yvonne Cuijpers; Lilian van der Vaart; Tineke Coenen de Roo; Marlies Leenaars; Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.471

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.