Monica Rittler1, Liliana Vauthay, Nancy Mazzitelli. 1. Medical Genetics Section, Department of Neonatology, Hospital Materno Infantil Ramón Sardá, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina. mrittler@fibertel.com.ar
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis (GS) is usually described as an abdominal wall defect, to the right of a normally inserted umbilical cord, without membraneous covering of the extruded organs. However, precise anatomical descriptions are lacking in the literature. Our aims were to provide evidence that allows reconsideration of its current definition, as well as an explanation for prenatal death, based on detailed observation of stillborn fetuses with GS and a review of the literature. METHODS: Prenatal studies, clinical examinations, and histological findings of five stillborn fetuses with isolated GS are described and photographic evidence is provided. RESULTS: In all five cases, the umbilical cord was only attached to the left side of the umbilical ring, while the right side remained uncovered, allowing evisceration of abdominal organs. Histological evidence of mucoid-like tissue at the free border of the ring suggests that at that site the cord was initially inserted and later detached. Characteristics of the umbilical ring, bowel dilatation, and autopsy findings of acute asphyxia strongly support compression of umbilical vessels as the cause of fetal death. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, on the lack of evidence in the literature demonstrating full-thickness abdominal wall separating the defect from the umbilical cord, and on a critical review of the proposed mechanisms favoring the hypothesis of a defect separate from the umbilical ring, we propose that GS represents a failure in the normal attachment between umbilical cord and umbilical ring. The consistent clinical course of fetuses with prenatal demise suggests careful targeted monitoring during late gestation.
BACKGROUND: Gastroschisis (GS) is usually described as an abdominal wall defect, to the right of a normally inserted umbilical cord, without membraneous covering of the extruded organs. However, precise anatomical descriptions are lacking in the literature. Our aims were to provide evidence that allows reconsideration of its current definition, as well as an explanation for prenatal death, based on detailed observation of stillborn fetuses with GS and a review of the literature. METHODS: Prenatal studies, clinical examinations, and histological findings of five stillborn fetuses with isolated GS are described and photographic evidence is provided. RESULTS: In all five cases, the umbilical cord was only attached to the left side of the umbilical ring, while the right side remained uncovered, allowing evisceration of abdominal organs. Histological evidence of mucoid-like tissue at the free border of the ring suggests that at that site the cord was initially inserted and later detached. Characteristics of the umbilical ring, bowel dilatation, and autopsy findings of acute asphyxia strongly support compression of umbilical vessels as the cause of fetal death. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings, on the lack of evidence in the literature demonstrating full-thickness abdominal wall separating the defect from the umbilical cord, and on a critical review of the proposed mechanisms favoring the hypothesis of a defect separate from the umbilical ring, we propose that GS represents a failure in the normal attachment between umbilical cord and umbilical ring. The consistent clinical course of fetuses with prenatal demise suggests careful targeted monitoring during late gestation.
Authors: Martha M Werler; Samantha E Parker; Klaus Hedman; Mika Gissler; Annukka Ritvanen; Heljä-Marja Surcel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-11-17 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Víctor M Salinas-Torres; Hugo L Gallardo-Blanco; Rafael A Salinas-Torres; Ricardo M Cerda-Flores; José J Lugo-Trampe; Daniel Z Villarreal-Martínez; Laura E Martínez de Villarreal Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Marcia L Feldkamp; Kathryn E Arnold; Sergey Krikov; Jennita Reefhuis; Lynn M Almli; Cynthia A Moore; Lorenzo D Botto Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-03-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elisabeth Pechriggl; Michael Blumer; R Shane Tubbs; Łukasz Olewnik; Marko Konschake; René Fortélny; Hannes Stofferin; Hanne Rose Honis; Sara Quinones; Eva Maranillo; José Sanudo Journal: Front Surg Date: 2022-07-07
Authors: Kaylee B Park; Teresa Chapman; Kimberly A Aldinger; Ghayda M Mirzaa; Jordan Zeiger; Anita Beck; Ian A Glass; Robert F Hevner; Anna C Jansen; Desiree A Marshall; Renske Oegema; Elena Parrini; Russell P Saneto; Cynthia J Curry; Judith G Hall; Renzo Guerrini; Richard J Leventer; William B Dobyns Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2020-11-18 Impact factor: 2.802