IMPORTANCE: Among patients presenting with critical lower extremity ischemia, it has been previously documented that white individuals are more likely to undergo revascularization than nonwhite individuals, with the disparity largely attributed to differences in resources and access to care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the amputation disparity between white and nonwhite patients with critical lower extremity ischemia in more detail using a larger data set than previous studies, with a focus on the role of confounding factors such as access and hospital resources. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: All hospital discharge records from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of adult patients with the primary diagnosis of critical lower extremity ischemia from 2002-2008 were examined in detail using multiple logistic regression (n = 774,399). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of amputation and revascularization for peripheral vascular disease across race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Controlling for confounding factors, black patients were found to have 1.77 times the odds of receiving an amputation compared with white patients (95% CI, 1.72-1.84; P < .001). Further analysis revealed the black to white odds ratio paradoxically increased with increasing revascularization capacity of the presenting hospital, from a low of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.23-1.65) to a high of 1.98 (95% CI, 1.83-2.24). The amputation disparity also paradoxically increased for patients living in wealthier zip codes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Black patients have greater odds of undergoing amputation than white patients, even after correcting for an array of confounding parameters. Contrary to current beliefs that the disparity is mainly secondary to differences in access, this study found that the disparity was magnified in settings where resources were greatest. Whether the explanation lies primarily in patient-specific, physician-specific, or institutional-specific factors remains to be determined but is critical to better understanding our health care system and maintaining approaches that are consistently fair and equitable.
IMPORTANCE: Among patients presenting with critical lower extremity ischemia, it has been previously documented that white individuals are more likely to undergo revascularization than nonwhite individuals, with the disparity largely attributed to differences in resources and access to care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the amputation disparity between white and nonwhite patients with critical lower extremity ischemia in more detail using a larger data set than previous studies, with a focus on the role of confounding factors such as access and hospital resources. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: All hospital discharge records from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of adult patients with the primary diagnosis of critical lower extremity ischemia from 2002-2008 were examined in detail using multiple logistic regression (n = 774,399). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of amputation and revascularization for peripheral vascular disease across race/ethnicity. RESULTS: Controlling for confounding factors, black patients were found to have 1.77 times the odds of receiving an amputation compared with white patients (95% CI, 1.72-1.84; P < .001). Further analysis revealed the black to white odds ratio paradoxically increased with increasing revascularization capacity of the presenting hospital, from a low of 1.43 (95% CI, 1.23-1.65) to a high of 1.98 (95% CI, 1.83-2.24). The amputation disparity also paradoxically increased for patients living in wealthier zip codes. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Black patients have greater odds of undergoing amputation than white patients, even after correcting for an array of confounding parameters. Contrary to current beliefs that the disparity is mainly secondary to differences in access, this study found that the disparity was magnified in settings where resources were greatest. Whether the explanation lies primarily in patient-specific, physician-specific, or institutional-specific factors remains to be determined but is critical to better understanding our health care system and maintaining approaches that are consistently fair and equitable.
Authors: Mary M McDermott; Tamar S Polonsky; Melina R Kibbe; Lu Tian; Lihui Zhao; William H Pearce; Ying Gao; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Hassanain Jassim; Johnathan T Seligman; Matthew Frelich; Matthew Goldblatt; Andrew Kastenmeier; James Wallace; Heather S Zhao; Aniko Szabo; Jon C Gould Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Melissa N Loja; Ann Brunson; Chin-Shang Li; John G Carson; Richard H White; Patrick S Romano; Nasim Hedayati Journal: Ann Vasc Surg Date: 2015-03-07 Impact factor: 1.466
Authors: Jaiben George; Suparna M Navale; Nicholas K Schiltz; Miguel Siccha; Alison K Klika; Carlos A Higuera Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Samantha Danielle Minc; Philip P Goodney; Ranjita Misra; Dylan Thibault; Gordon Stephen Smith; Luke Marone Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2020-01-19 Impact factor: 4.268