Literature DB >> 23552072

Inhibition of return in the archer fish.

Shai Gabay1, Tali Leibovich, Avi Ben-Simon, Avishai Henik, Ronen Segev.   

Abstract

Inhibition of return is the inhibitory tagging of recently attended locations or objects. It was previously suggested that inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Inhibition of return was first discovered in humans and was demonstrated also in monkeys, yet it has never been demonstrated in non-primates. Here we report the presence of inhibition of return in the archer fish, which shoots down prey on overhanging vegetation, using squirts of water spouted from its mouth. Moreover, we find similar attentional effects for fish as for human participants. Our results show that the generation of inhibition of return does not require a fully developed cortex and strengthen the view that inhibition of return functions as a foraging facilitator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23552072     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  20 in total

1.  Inhibition of return in spatial attention: direct evidence for collicular generation.

Authors:  A Sapir; N Soroker; A Berger; A Henik
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey.

Authors:  M C Dorris; T L Taylor; R M Klein; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Parietal lobe lesions disrupt saccadic remapping of inhibitory location tagging.

Authors:  Ayelet Sapir; Amy Hayes; Avishai Henik; Shai Danziger; Robert Rafal
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Looking for inhibition of return in pigeons.

Authors:  Brett M Gibson; Igor Juricevic; Sara J Shettleworth; Jay Pratt; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Individual performance based on cognitive experimental measurements? The case of inhibition of return.

Authors:  Andrea Berger
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2006

7.  Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants.

Authors:  Kazuharu Ohashi; James D Thomson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 8.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations.

Authors:  R D Rafal; P A Calabresi; C W Brennan; T K Sciolto
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Selective attention without a neocortex.

Authors:  Richard J Krauzlis; Amarender R Bogadhi; James P Herman; Anil Bollimunta
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.027

2.  Long-range neural inhibition and stimulus competition in the archerfish optic tectum.

Authors:  Svetlana Volotsky; Ehud Vinepinsky; Opher Donchin; Ronen Segev
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Categorical Signaling of the Strongest Stimulus by an Inhibitory Midbrain Nucleus.

Authors:  Hannah M Schryver; Malgorzata Straka; Shreesh P Mysore
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Attentional dynamics mediated by subcortical mechanisms.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Eye movements are primed toward the center of multiple stimuli even when the interstimulus distances are too large to generate saccade averaging.

Authors:  John Christie; Matthew D Hilchey; Ramesh Mishra; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Endogenous orienting in the archer fish.

Authors:  William Saban; Liora Sekely; Raymond M Klein; Shai Gabay
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Concept learning and the use of three common psychophysical paradigms in the archerfish (Toxotes chatareus).

Authors:  Cait Newport; Guy Wallis; Ulrike E Siebeck
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.492

8.  The Brain of the Archerfish Toxotes chatareus: A Nissl-Based Neuroanatomical Atlas and Catecholaminergic/Cholinergic Systems.

Authors:  Naomi Karoubi; Ronen Segev; Mario F Wullimann
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 3.856

9.  Coding Schemes in the Archerfish Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Adam Reichenthal; Mor Ben-Tov; Ronen Segev
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.492

10.  No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Roopali Bhatnagar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.