M M P van der Heijden1, F Pouwer, V J M Pop. 1. Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases (CoRPS), Tilburg University, P.O. Box: 90153, 5000, LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands, m.vdheijden@pozob.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Excercise self-efficacy is believed to influence physical activity bahavior. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric aspects of the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (ESS) in a type 2 diabetes Dutch Primary care sample. METHOD: Type 2 diabetes patients (n = 322; <80 years old) filled in the ESS and the short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). The structural validity of the ESS was assessed by means of principal axis factor analyses and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, reliability and concurrent validity with the SQUASH outcomes "total" and "leisure time minutes/week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity" were evaluated. T tests and ANOVAs were used to examine ESS scores in subgroups. In addition, a 13-item version of the ESS was developed. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on complete cases (n = 255). Exploratory factor analysis suggested one underlying factor (total explained variance 54 %), with good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a poor fit, as did a three-factor model suggested in an earlier research. Therefore, a 13-item ESS was developed with one underlying factor (total explained variance 59 %) and good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Both the 18-item and 13-item ESS correlated significantly with total and leisure time physical activity. ESS scores differed significantly between categories of education level and physical activity level. CONCLUSION: The 13-item ESS had sound psychometric properties in a large sample of primary care type 2 diabetes patients. The 13-item ESS could be useful in (intervention) research on physical activity in type 2 diabetes patients.
BACKGROUND: Excercise self-efficacy is believed to influence physical activity bahavior. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess the psychometric aspects of the Exercise Self-efficacy Scale (ESS) in a type 2 diabetes Dutch Primary care sample. METHOD:Type 2 diabetespatients (n = 322; <80 years old) filled in the ESS and the short questionnaire to assess health enhancing physical activity (SQUASH). The structural validity of the ESS was assessed by means of principal axis factor analyses and confirmatory factor analysis. In addition, reliability and concurrent validity with the SQUASH outcomes "total" and "leisure time minutes/week of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity" were evaluated. T tests and ANOVAs were used to examine ESS scores in subgroups. In addition, a 13-item version of the ESS was developed. RESULTS: Analyses were performed on complete cases (n = 255). Exploratory factor analysis suggested one underlying factor (total explained variance 54 %), with good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Confirmatory factor analysis showed a poor fit, as did a three-factor model suggested in an earlier research. Therefore, a 13-item ESS was developed with one underlying factor (total explained variance 59 %) and good internal consistency (α = 0.95). Both the 18-item and 13-item ESS correlated significantly with total and leisure time physical activity. ESS scores differed significantly between categories of education level and physical activity level. CONCLUSION: The 13-item ESS had sound psychometric properties in a large sample of primary care type 2 diabetespatients. The 13-item ESS could be useful in (intervention) research on physical activity in type 2 diabetespatients.
Authors: Thomas H Marwick; Matthew D Hordern; Todd Miller; Deborah A Chyun; Alain G Bertoni; Roger S Blumenthal; George Philippides; Albert Rocchini Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Steven T Johnson; Constantinos A Loucaides; Adrian E Bauman; Nandini D Karunamuni; Michael A Pickering Journal: J Obes Date: 2010-09-01
Authors: Berber Koopmans; François Pouwer; Robert A de Bie; Elisabeth S van Rooij; Geraline L Leusink; Victor J Pop Journal: Fam Pract Date: 2009-03-25 Impact factor: 2.267
Authors: Thamra S Al-Ghafri; Saud Al-Harthi; Yahya Al-Farsi; Angela M Craigie; Elaine Bannerman; Annie S Anderson Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2021-03-15
Authors: Sanne van der Weegen; Renée Verwey; Marieke Spreeuwenberg; Huibert Tange; Trudy van der Weijden; Luc de Witte Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-07-24 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Andrea Albergoni; Florentina J Hettinga; Wim Stut; Francesco Sartor Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-08-24 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Heleen Westland; Marieke J Schuurmans; Irene D Bos-Touwen; Marjolein A de Bruin-van Leersum; Evelyn M Monninkhof; Carin D Schröder; Daphne A de Vette; Jaap Ca Trappenburg Journal: Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2020-05-06 Impact factor: 3.908