Literature DB >> 23547280

Comparison of direct medical costs between automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

Laura Cortés-Sanabria1, Brenda E Rodríguez-Arreola, Victor R Ortiz-Juárez, Herman Soto-Molina, Leonardo Pazarín-Villaseñor, Héctor R Martínez-Ramírez, Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We set out to estimate the direct medical costs (DMCs) of peritoneal dialysis (PD) and to compare the DMCs for continuous ambulatory PD (CAPD) and automated PD (APD). In addition, DMCs according to age, sex, and the presence of peritonitis were evaluated.
METHODS: Our retrospective cohort analysis considered patients initiating PD, calculating 2008 costs and, for comparison, updating the results for 2010. The analysis took the perspective of the Mexican Institute of Social Security, including outpatient clinic and emergency room visits, dialysis procedures, medications, laboratory tests, hospitalizations, and surgeries.
RESULTS: No baseline differences were observed for the 41 patients evaluated (22 on CAPD, 19 on APD). Median annual DMCs per patient on PD were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. When analyzing percentage distribution, no differences were found in the DMCs for the modality groups. In both APD and CAPD, the main costs pertained to the dialysis procedure (CAPD 41%, APD 47%) and hospitalizations (CAPD 37%, APD 32%). Dialysis procedures cost significantly more (p = 0.001) in APD (US$7 084) than in CAPD (US$6 071), but total costs (APD US$15 389 vs CAPD US$14 798) and other resources were not different. The presence of peritonitis increased the total costs (US$16 075 vs US$14 705 for patients without peritonitis, p = 0.05), but in the generalized linear model analysis, DMCs were not predicted by age, sex, dialysis modality, or peritonitis. A similar picture was observed for costs extrapolated to 2010, with a 10% - 20% increase for each component--except for laboratory tests, which increased 52%, and dialysis procedures, which decreased 3%, from 2008.
CONCLUSIONS: The annual DMCs per patient on PD in this study were US$15 072 in 2008 and US$16 452 in 2010. Total DMCs for dialysis procedures were higher in APD than in CAPD, but the difference was not statistically significant. In both APD and CAPD, 90% of costs were attributable to the dialysis procedure, hospitalizations, and medications. In a multivariate analysis, no independent variable significantly predicted a higher DMC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct costs; automated peritoneal dialysis; continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23547280      PMCID: PMC3862098          DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perit Dial Int        ISSN: 0896-8608            Impact factor:   1.756


  21 in total

1.  Cost analysis of peritoneal catheter infections.

Authors:  B Piraino; J Bernardini; J Johnston
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  The burden of chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Rizwan A Hamer; A Meguid El Nahas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-03-11

3.  Chronic kidney disease in the developing world.

Authors:  Rashad S Barsoum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  [Costs of interventions for patients with chronic renal disease].

Authors:  A Arredondo; R Rangel; E de Icaza
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 5.  Analysis and interpretation of cost data in dialysis: review of Western European literature.

Authors:  P Peeters; D Rublee; P M Just; A Joseph
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 6.  Status of renal replacement therapy and peritoneal dialysis in Mexico.

Authors:  Alfonso M Cueto-Manzano; Enrique Rojas-Campos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Peritoneal dialysis in the US: evaluation of outcomes in contemporary cohorts.

Authors:  S Mujais; K Story
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 10.545

Review 8.  Automated vs continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; James Adams; Tariq Z Ali; Conal Daly; Luke Vale; Alison M Macleod
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 5.992

9.  Cost/Utility study of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in Chile.

Authors:  Alejandro Pacheco; Antonio Saffie; Rubén Torres; Cristian Tortella; Cristian Llanos; Daniel Vargas; Vito Sciaraffia
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

10.  Automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis have similar outcomes.

Authors:  S V Badve; C M Hawley; S P McDonald; D W Mudge; J B Rosman; F G Brown; D W Johnson
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 10.612

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluation of dialysis therapies.

Authors:  Scott W Klarenbach; Marcello Tonelli; Betty Chui; Braden J Manns
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of chronic kidney disease mineral and bone disorders clinical practice guidelines using the AGREE II instrument.

Authors:  Nigar Sekercioglu; Reem Al-Khalifah; Joycelyne Efua Ewusie; Rosilene M Elias; Lehana Thabane; Jason W Busse; Noori Akhtar-Danesh; Alfonso Iorio; Tetsuya Isayama; Juan Pablo Díaz Martínez; Ivan D Florez; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Economic costs of automated and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in Taiwan: a combined survey and retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Chao-Hsiun Tang; Yu-Ting Wu; Siao-Yuan Huang; Hsi-Hsien Chen; Ming-Ju Wu; Bang-Gee Hsu; Jer-Chia Tsai; Tso-Hsiao Chen; Yuh-Mou Sue
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  APD or CAPD: one glove does not fit all.

Authors:  Athanasios Roumeliotis; Stefanos Roumeliotis; Konstantinos Leivaditis; Marios Salmas; Theodoros Eleftheriadis; Vassilios Liakopoulos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Quality of life in primary caregivers of patients in peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis.

Authors:  Joel Monárrez-Espino; José Alberto Delgado-Valles; Gastón Ramírez-García
Journal:  J Bras Nefrol       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.