Literature DB >> 23546993

Expert-driven label fusion in multi-atlas-based segmentation of the prostate using weighted atlases.

T R Langerak1, U A van der Heide, A N T J Kotte, F F Berendsen, M van Vulpen, J P W Pluim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Automated segmentation is required for radiotherapy treatment planning, and multi-atlas methods are frequently used for this purpose. The combination of multiple intermediate results from multi-atlas segmentation into a single segmentation map can be achieved by label fusion. A method that includes expert knowledge in the label fusion phase of multi-atlas-based segmentation was developed. The method was tested by application to prostate segmentation, and the accuracy was compared to standard techniques.
METHODS: The selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE) algorithm for label fusion was modified with a weight map given by an expert that indicates the importance of each region in the evaluation of segmentation results. Voxel-based weights specified by an expert when performing the label fusion step in atlas-based segmentation were introduced into the modified SIMPLE algorithm. These weights incorporate expert knowledge on accuracy requirements in different regions of a segmentation. Using this knowledge, segmentation accuracy in regions known to be important can be improved by sacrificing segmentation accuracy in less important regions. Contextual information such as the presence of vulnerable tissue is then used in the segmentation process. This method using weight maps to fine-tune the result of multi-atlas-based segmentation was tested using a set of 146 atlas images consisting of an MR image of the lower abdomen and a prostate segmentation. Each image served as a target in a set of leave-one-out experiments. These experiments were repeated for a weight map derived from the clinical practice in our hospital.
RESULTS: The segmentation accuracy increased 6 % in regions that border vulnerable tissue using expert-specified voxel-based weight maps. This was achieved at the cost of a 4 % decrease in accuracy in less clinically relevant regions.
CONCLUSION: The inclusion of expert knowledge in a multi-atlas-based segmentation procedure was shown to be feasible for prostate segmentation. This method allows an expert to ensure that automatic segmentation is most accurate in critical regions. This improved local accuracy can increase the practical value of automatic segmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23546993     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-013-0836-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  14 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains.

Authors:  Torsten Rohlfing; Robert Brandt; Randolf Menzel; Calvin R Maurer
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Label fusion in atlas-based segmentation using a selective and iterative method for performance level estimation (SIMPLE).

Authors:  Thomas Robin Langerak; Uulke A van der Heide; Alexis N T J Kotte; Max A Viergever; Marco van Vulpen; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) anatomy of the prostate and application of MRI in radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Geert M Villeirs; Gert O De Meerleer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy.

Authors:  P Aljabar; R A Heckemann; A Hammers; J V Hajnal; D Rueckert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Multi-atlas-based segmentation with local decision fusion--application to cardiac and aortic segmentation in CT scans.

Authors:  Ivana Isgum; Marius Staring; Annemarieke Rutten; Mathias Prokop; Max A Viergever; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information.

Authors:  Stefan Klein; Uulke A van der Heide; Irene M Lips; Marco van Vulpen; Marius Staring; Josien P W Pluim
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation: application to the heart and the caudate nucleus.

Authors:  Eva M van Rikxoort; Ivana Isgum; Yulia Arzhaeva; Marius Staring; Stefan Klein; Max A Viergever; Josien P W Pluim; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  A continuous STAPLE for scalar, vector, and tensor images: an application to DTI analysis.

Authors:  Olivier Commowick; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  1 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.