Literature DB >> 23544392

Evaluating fidelity to the wraparound service model for youth: application of item response theory to the Wraparound Fidelity Index.

Michael D Pullmann1, Eric J Bruns, April K Sather.   

Abstract

The wraparound process is a mechanism for multisystem planning and care coordination for youth with serious emotional and behavioral problems. Fidelity monitoring is critical to effective implementation of evidence-based practices in children's mental health, as it helps ensure that complex interventions like wraparound are implemented as intended. The 40-item Wraparound Fidelity Index, Version 4 (WFI-4; Bruns, Burchard, Suter, Leverentz-Brady, & Force, 2004) is the most frequently used measure of fidelity to the wraparound process, but analysis of its psychometric properties is insufficient. An item response theory approach, Rasch partial credit models for ordered polytomous data, was used on ratings from 1,234 facilitators, 1,006 caregivers, and 221 team members, focused on 1,478 youths (55% male). Results indicated the WFI-4 measured a unidimensional construct, with little evidence of item bias and good item and model fit. However, the item information curve was skewed, with most people endorsing high-fidelity responses, and several items had duplicative location estimates. A reduced 20-item measure is proposed. Internal reliability estimates for scores from this reduced measure were approximately equivalent to the longer measure. However, both versions would benefit from additional items located in the highest fidelity area of either version of the scale where scores by greater than half of our sample fall, but only 3 items are located. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23544392      PMCID: PMC3755947          DOI: 10.1037/a0031864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Assess        ISSN: 1040-3590


  21 in total

Review 1.  Developmental science, systems of care, and prevention of emotional and behavioral problems in youth.

Authors:  T W Farmer; E M Farmer
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2001-04

Review 2.  Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?

Authors:  David Andrich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Assessing the wraparound process during family planning meetings.

Authors:  Michael H Epstein; Philip D Nordness; Krista Kutash; Al Duchnowski; Sheryl Schrepf; Greg J Benner; J Ron Nelson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Spreadsheets, service providers, and the Statehouse: using data and the wraparound process to reform systems for children and families.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Jim Rast; Christa Peterson; Janet Walker; Jone Bosworth
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2006-12

5.  Relations between program and system variables and fidelity to the wraparound process for children and families.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Jesse C Suter; Kristen M Leverentz-Brady
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  Is it wraparound yet? Setting quality standards for implementation of the wraparound process.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Jesse C Suter; Kristen Leverentz-Brady
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 7.  Program integrity in primary and early secondary prevention: are implementation effects out of control?

Authors:  A V Dane; B H Schneider
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01

8.  Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: the role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination.

Authors:  S W Henggeler; G B Melton; M J Brondino; D G Scherer; J H Hanley
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1997-10

9.  Intervening in the lives of youth with complex behavioral health challenges and their families: the role of the wraparound process.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Janet S Walker; Michelle Zabel; Marlene Matarese; Kimberly Estep; Deborah Harburger; Madge Mosby; Sheila A Pires
Journal:  Am J Community Psychol       Date:  2010-12

10.  An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Authors:  Julie F Pallant; Alan Tennant
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2007-03
View more
  3 in total

1.  Psychometrics, Reliability, and Validity of a Wraparound Team Observation Measure.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Ericka S Weathers; Jesse C Suter; Spencer Hensley; Michael D Pullmann; April Sather
Journal:  J Child Fam Stud       Date:  2015-04-01

2.  Effectiveness of wraparound versus case management for children and adolescents: results of a randomized study.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Michael D Pullmann; April Sather; Ramona Denby Brinson; Michelle Ramey
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-05

3.  Impact of a Web-Based Electronic Health Record on Behavioral Health Service Delivery for Children and Adolescents: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Eric J Bruns; Alyssa N Hook; Elizabeth M Parker; Isabella Esposito; April Sather; Ryan M Parigoris; Aaron R Lyon; Kelly L Hyde
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.