Literature DB >> 23542800

Protective mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for open abdominal surgery improves postoperative pulmonary function.

Paolo Severgnini1, Gabriele Selmo, Christian Lanza, Alessandro Chiesa, Alice Frigerio, Alessandro Bacuzzi, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Raffaele Novario, Cesare Gregoretti, Marcelo Gama de Abreu, Marcus J Schultz, Samir Jaber, Emmanuel Futier, Maurizio Chiaranda, Paolo Pelosi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of intraoperative ventilation on postoperative pulmonary complications is not defined. The authors aimed at determining the effectiveness of protective mechanical ventilation during open abdominal surgery on a modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score as primary outcome and postoperative pulmonary function.
METHODS: Prospective randomized, open-label, clinical trial performed in 56 patients scheduled to undergo elective open abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h. Patients were assigned by envelopes to mechanical ventilation with tidal volume of 9 ml/kg ideal body weight and zero-positive end-expiratory pressure (standard ventilation strategy) or tidal volumes of 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, 10 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure, and recruitment maneuvers (protective ventilation strategy). Modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score, gas exchange, and pulmonary functional tests were measured preoperatively, as well as at days 1, 3, and 5 after surgery.
RESULTS: Patients ventilated protectively showed better pulmonary functional tests up to day 5, fewer alterations on chest x-ray up to day 3 and higher arterial oxygenation in air at days 1, 3, and 5 (mmHg; mean ± SD): 77.1 ± 13.0 versus 64.9 ± 11.3 (P = 0.0006), 80.5 ± 10.1 versus 69.7 ± 9.3 (P = 0.0002), and 82.1 ± 10.7 versus 78.5 ± 21.7 (P = 0.44) respectively. The modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score was lower in the protective ventilation strategy at days 1 and 3. The percentage of patients in hospital at day 28 after surgery was not different between groups (7 vs. 15% respectively, P = 0.42).
CONCLUSION: A protective ventilation strategy during abdominal surgery lasting more than 2 h improved respiratory function and reduced the modified Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score without affecting length of hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542800     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31829102de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  108 in total

1.  Expert consensus on the perioperative management of patients with sepsis.

Authors:  Jun-Ping Chen; Xiang-Ming Fang; Xiao-Ju Jin; Rong-Tian Kang; Ke-Xuan Liu; Jin-Bao Li; Yan Luo; Zhi-Jie Lu; Chang-Hong Miao; Han-Xiang Ma; Wei Mei; Yang-Wen Ou; Si-Hua Qi; Zai-Sheng Qin; Guo-Gang Tian; An-Shi Wu; Dong-Xin Wang; Tian Yu; Yong-Hao Yu; Jing Zhao; Ming-Zhang Zuo; Shi-Hai Zhang
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  One more brick in the wall of protective ventilation in surgical patients.

Authors:  Roberto Rabello Filho; Ary Serpa Neto
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

3.  Mild loss of lung aeration augments stretch in healthy lung regions.

Authors:  Maurizio Cereda; Yi Xin; Hooman Hamedani; Justin Clapp; Stephen Kadlecek; Natalie Meeder; Johnathan Zeng; Harrilla Profka; Brian P Kavanagh; Rahim R Rizi
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2015-12-10

4.  Positive end-expiratory pressure increments during anesthesia in normal lung result in hysteresis and greater numbers of smaller aerated airspaces.

Authors:  Maurizio Cereda; Yi Xin; Kiarash Emami; Jessie Huang; Jennia Rajaei; Harrilla Profka; Biao Han; Puttisarn Mongkolwisetwara; Stephen Kadlecek; Nicholas N Kuzma; Stephen Pickup; Brian P Kavanagh; Clifford S Deutschman; Rahim R Rizi
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  [Comments on: comparative investigation on intraoperative "lung-protective ventilation" in abdominal surgery].

Authors:  G Schälte; N Zoremba
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  [Ventilation as a trigger for organ dysfunction and sepsis].

Authors:  J Karsten; H Heinze
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 0.840

7.  Management of 1-Lung Ventilation-Variation and Trends in Clinical Practice: A Report From the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group.

Authors:  Douglas A Colquhoun; Bhiken I Naik; Marcel E Durieux; Amy M Shanks; Sachin Kheterpal; S Patrick Bender; Randal S Blank
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  Early effect of tidal volume on lung injury biomarkers in surgical patients with healthy lungs.

Authors:  Ana Fernandez-Bustamante; Jelena Klawitter; John E Repine; Amanda Agazio; Allison J Janocha; Chirag Shah; Marc Moss; Ivor S Douglas; Zung Vu Tran; Serpil C Erzurum; Uwe Christians; Tamas Seres
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Regional lung derecruitment and inflammation during 16 hours of mechanical ventilation in supine healthy sheep.

Authors:  Mauro R Tucci; Eduardo L V Costa; Tyler J Wellman; Guido Musch; Tilo Winkler; R Scott Harris; Jose G Venegas; Marcelo B P Amato; Marcos F Vidal Melo
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Differential Effects of Intraoperative Positive End-expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on Respiratory Outcome in Major Abdominal Surgery Versus Craniotomy.

Authors:  Myrthe A C de Jong; Karim S Ladha; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Anne Kathrine Staehr-Rye; Edward A Bittner; Tobias Kurth; Matthias Eikermann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.