BACKGROUND: Pooled viral load (VL) testing with 2 different testing strategies was evaluated as a potential cost saving method to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected children receiving ART in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Archived samples collected from 250 HIV-1-infected children on first-line ART at various time points post-ART initiation were evaluated for pooled VL testing using a minipool + algorithm strategy. Additionally, samples collected in real time from 125 children on ART were assessed for virologic failure using a minipool strategy for pooled VL testing. Virologic failure was determined as HIV-1 RNA VLs >1500 copies/mL. RESULTS: Minipool + algorithm strategy for pooled VL testing of archived samples had estimated viral failure of 13.6%, with a relative efficiency (RE) of 23.6% (95% CI: 18.5 to 29.4), and negative predictive value of 88%. This testing strategy would have resulted in 24% fewer assays needed for a cost savings of $1180 per 100 samples. The minipool strategy for pooled VL testing of samples obtained in real time yielded an estimated 23.2% of samples with viral failure and a RE of 8.0% (95% CI: 3.9 to 14.2); however, had a minipool + algorithm pooling strategy been used, the RE would have increased to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The minipool + algorithm strategy for pooled VL testing to detect virologic failure in HIV-1-infected children on ART was determined to be relatively efficient in detecting virologic failure, have high negative predictive value, with substantial cost savings. Pooling strategies may be important components of cost-effect strategies to reduce rates of viral failure and resistance, thus, improving clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Pooled viral load (VL) testing with 2 different testing strategies was evaluated as a potential cost saving method to monitor antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infectedchildren receiving ART in a resource-limited setting. METHODS: Archived samples collected from 250 HIV-1-infectedchildren on first-line ART at various time points post-ART initiation were evaluated for pooled VL testing using a minipool + algorithm strategy. Additionally, samples collected in real time from 125 children on ART were assessed for virologic failure using a minipool strategy for pooled VL testing. Virologic failure was determined as HIV-1 RNA VLs >1500 copies/mL. RESULTS: Minipool + algorithm strategy for pooled VL testing of archived samples had estimated viral failure of 13.6%, with a relative efficiency (RE) of 23.6% (95% CI: 18.5 to 29.4), and negative predictive value of 88%. This testing strategy would have resulted in 24% fewer assays needed for a cost savings of $1180 per 100 samples. The minipool strategy for pooled VL testing of samples obtained in real time yielded an estimated 23.2% of samples with viral failure and a RE of 8.0% (95% CI: 3.9 to 14.2); however, had a minipool + algorithm pooling strategy been used, the RE would have increased to 20%. CONCLUSIONS: The minipool + algorithm strategy for pooled VL testing to detect virologic failure in HIV-1-infectedchildren on ART was determined to be relatively efficient in detecting virologic failure, have high negative predictive value, with substantial cost savings. Pooling strategies may be important components of cost-effect strategies to reduce rates of viral failure and resistance, thus, improving clinical outcomes.
Authors: Kim C E Sigaloff; Job C J Calis; Sibyl P Geelen; Michèle van Vugt; Tobias F Rinke de Wit Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2011-08-25 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Myres W Tilghman; Don Diego Guerena; Alexei Licea; Josué Pérez-Santiago; Douglas D Richman; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Michael P Busch; Simone A Glynn; Susan L Stramer; D Michael Strong; Sally Caglioti; David J Wright; Brandee Pappalardo; Steven H Kleinman Journal: Transfusion Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Christopher D Pilcher; J Todd McPherson; Peter A Leone; Marlene Smurzynski; Judy Owen-O'Dowd; Amy L Peace-Brewer; Juanita Harris; Charles B Hicks; Joseph J Eron; Susan A Fiscus Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-07-10 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Andrew N Phillips; Deenan Pillay; Alec H Miners; Diane E Bennett; Charles F Gilks; Jens D Lundgren Journal: Lancet Date: 2008-04-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Mina C Hosseinipour; Joep J G van Oosterhout; Ralf Weigel; Sam Phiri; Debbie Kamwendo; Neil Parkin; Susan A Fiscus; Julie A E Nelson; Joseph J Eron; Johnstone Kumwenda Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-06-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Catherine Orrell; Guy Harling; Stephen D Lawn; Richard Kaplan; Matthew McNally; Linda-Gail Bekker; Robin Wood Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2007
Authors: Ravindra K Gupta; Andrew Hill; Anthony W Sawyer; Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri; Viktor von Wyl; Sabine Yerly; Viviane Dias Lima; Huldrych F Günthard; Charles Gilks; Deenan Pillay Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Dalton C Wamalwa; Carey Farquhar; Elizabeth M Obimbo; Sara Selig; Dorothy A Mbori-Ngacha; Barbra A Richardson; Julie Overbaugh; Thaddeus Egondi; Irene Inwani; Grace John-Stewart Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2009-06-24 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Pieter Pannus; Emmanuel Fajardo; Carol Metcalf; Rebecca M Coulborn; Laura T Durán; Helen Bygrave; Tom Ellman; Daniela Garone; Michael Murowa; Reuben Mwenda; Tony Reid; Wolfgang Preiser Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Karyn Heavner; Craig Newschaffer; Irva Hertz-Picciotto; Deborah Bennett; Igor Burstyn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-11-19 Impact factor: 3.390