Literature DB >> 23542027

ACR Appropriateness Criteria chronic chest pain-low to intermediate probability of coronary artery disease.

Pamela K Woodard1, Richard D White, Suhny Abbara, Philip A Araoz, Ricardo C Cury, Sharmila Dorbala, James P Earls, Udo Hoffmann, Joe Y Hsu, Jill E Jacobs, Cylen Javidan-Nejad, Rajesh Krishnamurthy, Leena Mammen, Edward T Martin, Thomas Ryan, Amar B Shah, Robert M Steiner, Jens Vogel-Claussen, Charles S White.   

Abstract

Chronic chest pain can arise from a variety of etiologies. However, of those potential causes, the most life-threatening include cardiac disease. Chronic cardiac chest pain may be caused either by ischemia or atherosclerotic coronary artery disease or by other cardiac-related etiologies, such as pericardial disease. To consider in patients, especially those who are at low risk for coronary artery disease, are etiologies of chronic noncardiac chest pain. Noncardiac chest pain is most commonly related to gastroesophageal reflux disease or other esophageal diseases. Alternatively, it may be related to costochondritis, arthritic or degenerative diseases, old trauma, primary or metastatic tumors, or pleural disease. Rarely, noncardiac chest pain may be referred pain from organ systems below the diaphragm, such as the gallbladder. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23542027     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.01.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  4 in total

1.  Comparing two methods for determining appropriateness of myocardial perfusion imaging: Criteria from the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Anastasiya Bagrova; Ali Y Alsamarah; David E Winchester
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  The role of imaging in women with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Rachel M Bond; Jennifer H Mieres
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in women for the evaluation of stable ischemic heart disease-state-of-the-evidence and clinical recommendations.

Authors:  Viviany R Taqueti; Sharmila Dorbala; David Wolinsky; Brian Abbott; Gary V Heller; Timothy M Bateman; Jennifer H Mieres; Lawrence M Phillips; Nanette K Wenger; Leslee J Shaw
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Ethnic difference in the prevalence of angina pectoris in Sami and non-Sami populations: the SAMINOR study.

Authors:  Bent-Martin Eliassen; Sidsel Graff-Iversen; Marita Melhus; Maja-Lisa Løchen; Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 1.228

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.