OBJECTIVE: Depression during pregnancy can negatively affect both maternal and fetal health. The benefits of early detection and treatment for antenatal depression have been emphasized. Therefore, we investigated risk factors for antenatal depression with a focus on emotional support. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women (n=1262) enrolled from the local division of a community mental health center. All subjects completed self-report questionnaires that assessed depressive mood, emotional support and other risk factors. Associations between antenatal depression and potential risk factors including emotional support were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Antenatal depression was associated with various biopsychosocial correlates: unmarried state, low education, cigarette smoking, low income, familial history of depression, past history of depression, physical abuse history, sexual abuse history, premenstrual syndrome, primiparity and unplanned pregnancy. When the associations of emotional support with antenatal depression were specified by its resources, current emotional support from partner [odds ratio (OR)=2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.94-2.64] and mother (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.26-1.62) and past experience for emotional support from mother (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.32-1.74), but not from father significantly influenced depression during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The multidimensional biopsychosocial approach would be needed to identify and assess antenatal depression. Promoting emotional support from the partner, family member and, possibly, the health provider could be a protective effect against the development of antenatal depression.
OBJECTIVE:Depression during pregnancy can negatively affect both maternal and fetal health. The benefits of early detection and treatment for antenatal depression have been emphasized. Therefore, we investigated risk factors for antenatal depression with a focus on emotional support. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women (n=1262) enrolled from the local division of a community mental health center. All subjects completed self-report questionnaires that assessed depressive mood, emotional support and other risk factors. Associations between antenatal depression and potential risk factors including emotional support were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Antenatal depression was associated with various biopsychosocial correlates: unmarried state, low education, cigarette smoking, low income, familial history of depression, past history of depression, physical abuse history, sexual abuse history, premenstrual syndrome, primiparity and unplanned pregnancy. When the associations of emotional support with antenatal depression were specified by its resources, current emotional support from partner [odds ratio (OR)=2.26, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.94-2.64] and mother (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.26-1.62) and past experience for emotional support from mother (OR=1.52, 95% CI=1.32-1.74), but not from father significantly influenced depression during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: The multidimensional biopsychosocial approach would be needed to identify and assess antenatal depression. Promoting emotional support from the partner, family member and, possibly, the health provider could be a protective effect against the development of antenatal depression.
Authors: Mary Kimmel; Makena Clive; Fiona Gispen; Jerry Guintivano; Tori Brown; Olivia Cox; Matthias W Beckmann; Johannes Kornhuber; Peter A Fasching; Lauren M Osborne; Elisabeth Binder; Jennifer L Payne; Zachary Kaminsky Journal: Psychoneuroendocrinology Date: 2016-04-08 Impact factor: 4.905
Authors: Hyoung Yoon Chang; Katherine M Keyes; Kyung-Sook Lee; In Ae Choi; Se Joo Kim; Kyung Won Kim; Youn Ho Shin; Kang Mo Ahn; Soo-Jong Hong; Yee-Jin Shin Journal: Early Hum Dev Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 2.079
Authors: Susan Kendig; John P Keats; M Camille Hoffman; Lisa B Kay; Emily S Miller; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Ariela Frieder; Barbara Hackley; Pec Indman; Christena Raines; Kisha Semenuk; Katherine L Wisner; Lauren A Lemieux Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Jonathan Y Huang; Dodie Arnold; Chun-Fang Qiu; Raymond S Miller; Michelle A Williams; Daniel A Enquobahrie Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Patricia Anne Kinser; Leroy R Thacker; Dana Lapato; Sara Wagner; Roxann Roberson-Nay; Lisa Jobe-Shields; Ananda Amstadter; Timothy P York Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2017-12-14 Impact factor: 2.681