OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an objective method for ultrasonographic (US) subcategorization of BI-RADS(®)-US 4 breast masses based on clear and simple rules in order for woman to benefit from a more complete and homogeneous breast mass analysis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we selected 330 women, with 339 US breast masses, classified as BI-RADS(®)-US 4. Three physicians experienced in breast imaging independently reviewed all US images, assessing mass shape, margins, orientation, echo texture and vascularity. These experts further subdivided the masses into subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c, according to simple US rules. Inter-observer agreement was calculated for US features categories and for final subcategory assessment. We also estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) for BI-RADS(®)-US subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c assigned by each of the three observers. RESULTS: Pathological examination of all masses confirmed 144 (42%) malignant and 195 (58%) benign tumors. Moderate agreement was obtained for mass shape, margins, vascularity and for final BI-RADS(®)-US 4 subcategory. Substantial agreement was obtained for the description of mass orientation and echo texture. The PPV for subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c were, 17%, 45% and 85%, respectively, for the first observer and 20%, 38% and 79% and 17%, 40% and 85% for the other two observers. CONCLUSION: Standardization of a US subcategorization of BI-RADS(®)-US 4 breast masses seems to be feasible, with substantial inter-observer agreement and progressive increase in the PPV in the subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c, provided that clear and simple classification rules are defined.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an objective method for ultrasonographic (US) subcategorization of BI-RADS(®)-US 4 breast masses based on clear and simple rules in order for woman to benefit from a more complete and homogeneous breast mass analysis. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we selected 330 women, with 339 US breast masses, classified as BI-RADS(®)-US 4. Three physicians experienced in breast imaging independently reviewed all US images, assessing mass shape, margins, orientation, echo texture and vascularity. These experts further subdivided the masses into subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c, according to simple US rules. Inter-observer agreement was calculated for US features categories and for final subcategory assessment. We also estimated the positive predictive value (PPV) for BI-RADS(®)-US subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c assigned by each of the three observers. RESULTS: Pathological examination of all masses confirmed 144 (42%) malignant and 195 (58%) benign tumors. Moderate agreement was obtained for mass shape, margins, vascularity and for final BI-RADS(®)-US 4 subcategory. Substantial agreement was obtained for the description of mass orientation and echo texture. The PPV for subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c were, 17%, 45% and 85%, respectively, for the first observer and 20%, 38% and 79% and 17%, 40% and 85% for the other two observers. CONCLUSION: Standardization of a US subcategorization of BI-RADS(®)-US 4 breast masses seems to be feasible, with substantial inter-observer agreement and progressive increase in the PPV in the subcategories 4a, 4b and 4c, provided that clear and simple classification rules are defined.
Authors: A Thomas Stavros; Andrea G Freitas; Giselle G N deMello; Lora Barke; Dennis McDonald; Terese Kaske; Ducly Wolverton; Arnold Honick; Daniela Stanzani; Adriana H Padovan; Ana Paula C Moura; Marilia C V de Campos Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ihsan Metin Leblebici; Suleyman Bozkurt; Turgut Tunc Eren; Ibrahim Ali Ozemir; Julide Sagiroglu; Orhan Alimoglu Journal: North Clin Istanb Date: 2014-08-03
Authors: Eun Jung Choi; Eun Hye Lee; You Me Kim; Yun-Woo Chang; Jin Hwa Lee; Young Mi Park; Keum Won Kim; Young Joong Kim; Jae Kwan Jun; Seri Hong Journal: Ultrasonography Date: 2018-09-22