Literature DB >> 2354091

Influence of obesity on the spread of spinal analgesia after injection of plain 0.5% bupivacaine at the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace.

T Taivainen1, M Tuominen, P H Rosenberg.   

Abstract

Spinal anaesthesia was compared in 40 obese patients (increased body mass index (BMI] and 40 patients with normal BMI when 3 ml of plain 0.5% bupivacaine was injected at either the L3-4 or L4-5 interspace. More extensive cephalad spread of sensory block was achieved in patients with increased BMI compared with patients with normal BMI after injection at both L3-4 and L4-5 (P less than 0.05). The use of the L3-4 interspace instead of L4-5 resulted in a higher mean spread of block in patients with both increased (T4 vs T8) or normal (T9 vs T11) BMI (P less than 0.05). The interindividual variability of the blocks was relatively small in patients with normal BMI injected at L4-5, compared with the three other groups (normal BMI injected at L3-4, increased BMI injected at L3-4 and L4-5). Good anaesthesia was produced in all patients for orthopaedic surgery of the lower extremity. In an obese patient it is recommended that plain bupivacaine be administered at L4-5 instead of L3-4 when extensive spread of the block is to be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2354091     DOI: 10.1093/bja/64.5.542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of two different doses of intrathecal levobupivacaine for transurethral endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Secil Dizman; Gurkan Turker; Alp Gurbet; Elif Basagan Mogol; Suat Turkcan; Ziyaatin Karakuzu
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2011-08

Review 2.  A Review of the Toxicologic Implications of Obesity.

Authors:  Matthew Zuckerman; Howard A Greller; Kavita M Babu
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2015-09

3.  The effect of body mass index on the spread of spinal block in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Kari A Leino; Kristiina S Kuusniemi; Heikki K Pälve; Hannu T Tiusanen; Tapani T Tuppurainen
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 4.  Anesthetic challenges in the obese patient.

Authors:  Rudin Domi; Haki Laho
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  The Levels and Duration of Sensory and Motor Blockades of Spinal Anesthesia in Obese Patients That Underwent Urological Operations in the Lithotomy Position.

Authors:  Taner Ciftci; Ali Bestemi Kepekci; Hatice Pınar Yavasca; Hayrettin Daskaya; Volkan İnal
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Obesity is independently associated with spinal anesthesia outcomes: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hyo-Jin Kim; Won Ho Kim; Hyung Woo Lim; Jie Ae Kim; Duk-Kyung Kim; Byung Seop Shin; Woo Seog Sim; Tae Soo Hahm; Chung Su Kim; Sangmin M Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Correlation Between Anthropometric Measurements and Sensory Block Level of Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Hyojoong Kim; Sung Hyun Shin; Myoung Jin Ko; Yei Heum Park; Ki Hwa Lee; Kyung-Hoon Kim; Tae-Kyun Kim
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-14

Review 8.  Regional anesthesia and obesity.

Authors:  Jay B Brodsky; Harry J M Lemmens
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.479

9.  Abdominal girth and vertebral column length can adjust spinal anesthesia for lower limb surgery, a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Qing-he Zhou; Bo Zhu; Chang-na Wei; Min Yan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 2.217

10.  Intra-abdominal pressure, vertebral column length, and spread of spinal anesthesia in parturients undergoing cesarean section: An observational study.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Ni; Ying Zhou; An-Cui Yong; Lu Wang; Qing-He Zhou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.