Literature DB >> 16732782

Why do women go along with this stuff?

S Kitzinger, J M Green, B Chalmers, M Keirse, K Lindstrom, E Hemminki.   

Abstract

PREFACE: Normal childbirth has become jeopardized by inexorably rising interventions around the world. In many countries and settings, cesarean surgery, labor induction, and epidural analgesia continue to increase beyond all precedent, and without convincing evidence that these actions result in improved outcomes (1,2). Use of electronic fetal monitoring is endemic, despite evidence of its ineffectiveness and consequences for most parturients (1,3); ultrasound examinations are too often done unnecessarily, redundantly, or for frivolous rather than indicated reasons (4); episiotomies are still routine in many settings despite clear evidence that this surgery results in more harm than good (5); and medical procedures, unphysiological positions, pubic shaving and enemas, intravenous lines, enforced fasting, drugs, and early mother-infant separation are used unnecessarily (1). Clinicians write and talk about the ideal of evidence-based obstetrics, but do not practice it consistently, if at all. Why do women go along with this stuff? In this Roundtable Discussion, Part 1, we asked some maternity care professionals and advocates to discuss this question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16732782     DOI: 10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00094.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  7 in total

1.  Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Kristin P Tully; Helen L Ball
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Shaping public opinion on the issue of childbirth; a critical analysis of articles published in an Australian newspaper.

Authors:  Meredith J McIntyre; Karen Francis; Ysanne Chapman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  National review of maternity services 2008: women influencing change.

Authors:  Meredith J McIntyre; Karen Francis; Ysanne Chapman
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Intermittent auscultation versus continuous fetal monitoring: exploring factors that influence birthing unit nurses' fetal surveillance practice using theoretical domains framework.

Authors:  Andrea M Patey; Janet A Curran; Ann E Sprague; Jill J Francis; S Michelle Driedger; France Légaré; Louise Lemyre; Marie-Pascale A Pomey; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  The Impact of Mode of Birth on Childbirth-Related Post Traumatic Stress Symptoms beyond 6 Months Postpartum: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Nicole Ginter; Lea Takács; Martine J M Boon; Corine J M Verhoeven; Hannah G Dahlen; Lilian L Peters
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Disrespect and abuse during labour and birth amongst 12,239 women in the Netherlands: a national survey.

Authors:  Marit S G van der Pijl; Corine J M Verhoeven; Rachel Verweij; Tineke van der Linden; Elselijn Kingma; Martine H Hollander; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.355

7.  Women's experiences of continuous support during childbirth: a meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Petronellah Lunda; Catharina Susanna Minnie; Petronella Benadé
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.