Literature DB >> 23540207

Air samplings in a Campylobacter jejuni positive laying hen flock.

Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed1, Jochen Schulz, Joerg Hartung.   

Abstract

The air in laying hen houses contains high concentrations of airborne bacteria. The numbers of these bacteria can be influenced by the efficiency of the chosen sampling method. In the presented study, AGI-30 Impingers and the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler were compared in terms of their efficiency in sampling aerobic mesophilic bacteria in a laying hen house. Measurements were conducted in a laying hen flock with high prevalences of C. jejuni in order to investigate if culturable cells of this organism can also be detected by the applied methods. Airborne dust was also analyzed for the presence of C. jejuni specific DNA to assess the possible occurrence of non-culturable C. jejuni in the hen house air. The numbers of mesophilic airborne bacteria ranged from 8 × 10(4) - 2 × 10(6) CFU/m(-3) when sampled using AGI-30 Impingers, and from 2 × 10(5) - 4 × 10(6) CFU/m -3 when sampled using a Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler. The concentrations detected simultaneously by both devices correlated well (rPearson = 0.755), but the Coriolis(®)µ air Sampler showed a significantly higher sampling efficiency (p<0.001). Although, the within flock prevalence of C. jejuni was high during the experiments (between 70-93%), neither of the air sampling methods could detect culturable C. jejuni from the air. However, C. jejuni specific DNA was detected in 15 out of 18 airborne dust samples by mapA PCR. Based on the results, it can be concluded that airborne culturable C. jejuni were not detectable, even with an efficient air sampler, because of their low concentration. Therefore, the risk of airborne infection to poultry workers on inhaling airborne C. jejuni seems negligible. Also, the transmission of culturable C. jejuni to neighboring farms by the airborne route is unlikely. Otherwise, the detection of airborne C. jejuni specific DNA suggests that non-culturable cells could appear in the hen house air, and in future it should be verified whether sampling stress of the air sampling methods could induce the non-culturable state.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23540207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  11 in total

1.  Emission Sources of Campylobacter from Agricultural Farms, Impact on Environmental Contamination and Intervention Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Szott; Anika Friese
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  Bioaerosol Sampler Choice Should Consider Efficiency and Ability of Samplers To Cover Microbial Diversity.

Authors:  Hamza Mbareche; Marc Veillette; Guillaume J Bilodeau; Caroline Duchaine
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluation of Legionella Air Contamination in Healthcare Facilities by Different Sampling Methods: An Italian Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Montagna; Osvalda De Giglio; Maria Luisa Cristina; Christian Napoli; Claudia Pacifico; Antonella Agodi; Tatjana Baldovin; Beatrice Casini; Maria Anna Coniglio; Marcello Mario D'Errico; Santi Antonino Delia; Maria Grazia Deriu; Marco Guida; Pasqualina Laganà; Giorgio Liguori; Matteo Moro; Ida Mura; Francesca Pennino; Gaetano Privitera; Vincenzo Romano Spica; Silvia Sembeni; Anna Maria Spagnolo; Stefano Tardivo; Ida Torre; Federica Valeriani; Roberto Albertini; Cesira Pasquarella
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Decontamination of aerosolised bacteria from a pig farm environment using a pH neutral electrochemically activated solution (Ecas4 anolyte).

Authors:  Sangay Tenzin; Abiodun David Ogunniyi; Manouchehr Khazandi; Sergio Ferro; Jonathon Bartsch; Simon Crabb; Sam Abraham; Permal Deo; Darren J Trott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evaluation of Air Contamination in Orthopaedic Operating Theatres in Hospitals in Southern Italy: The IMPACT Project.

Authors:  Maria Teresa Montagna; Serafina Rutigliano; Paolo Trerotoli; Christian Napoli; Francesca Apollonio; Alessandro D'Amico; Osvalda De Giglio; Giusy Diella; Marco Lopuzzo; Angelo Marzella; Simona Mascipinto; Chrysovalentinos Pousis; Roberto Albertini; Cesira Pasquarella; Daniela D'Alessandro; Gabriella Serio; Giuseppina Caggiano
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Concentrations of Aerosol Numbers and Airborne Bacteria, and Temperature and Relative Humidity, and Their Interrelationships in a Tie-Stall Dairy Barn.

Authors:  Md Aminul Islam; Atsuo Ikeguchi; Takanori Naide
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Prevalence, genotyping and risk factors of thermophilic Campylobacter spreading in organic turkey farms in Germany.

Authors:  Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed; Hosny El-Adawy; Helmut Hotzel; Herbert Tomaso; Heinrich Neubauer; Nicole Kemper; Joerg Hartung; Hafez Mohamed Hafez
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.181

8.  Evaluation of a microfluidic chip system for preparation of bacterial DNA from swabs, air, and surface water samples.

Authors:  Sandra Julich; Helmut Hotzel; Claudia Gärtner; Daniel Trouchet; Marwa Fawzy El Metwaly Ahmed; Nicole Kemper; Herbert Tomaso
Journal:  Biologicals       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 1.856

9.  Impact of different supply air and recirculating air filtration systems on stable climate, animal health, and performance of fattening pigs in a commercial pig farm.

Authors:  Cindy Wenke; Janina Pospiech; Tobias Reutter; Bettina Altmann; Uwe Truyen; Stephanie Speck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Operative and Technical Modifications to the Coriolis® µ Air Sampler That Improve Sample Recovery and Biosafety During Microbiological Air Sampling.

Authors:  Nuno Rufino de Sousa; Lei Shen; David Silcott; Charles J Call; Antonio Gigliotti Rothfuchs
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 2.179

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.