Literature DB >> 20566784

A feasibility study of quantitative molecular characterization of musculoskeletal lesions by proton MR spectroscopy at 3 T.

Laura M Fayad1, Xin Wang, Nouha Salibi, Peter B Barker, Michael A Jacobs, Antonio J Machado, Kristy L Weber, David A Bluemke.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to establish the feasibility and potential value of measuring the concentration of choline-containing compounds by proton MR spectroscopy (MRS) in musculoskeletal lesions at 3 T. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three subjects with 34 musculoskeletal lesions (four histologically proven malignant, 13 histologically proven benign or proven benign by follow-up analysis, and 17 posttreatment fibrosis with documented stability for 6-36 months) underwent single-voxel 3-T MRS studies. In each case, both water-suppressed and water-unsuppressed scans were obtained. The quality of the scans was recorded as excellent, adequate, or nondiagnostic, and the choline concentration was measured using water as the internal reference. The choline concentrations of benign and malignant lesions were compared using the Mann-Whitney test.
RESULTS: Spectral quality was excellent in 26 cases, adequate in four cases, and nondiagnostic in four cases. For malignant lesions (three sarcomas), the choline concentrations were 1.5, 2.9, and 3.8 mmol/kg, respectively. For five benign lesions (two neurofibromas, two schwannomas, and one enchondroma), the choline concentrations were 0.11, 0.28, 0.13, 0.8, and 1.2 mmol/kg, respectively. For seven benign lesions (two hematomas, two bone cysts, one lipoma, one giant cell tumor, and one pigmented villonodular synovitis), the spectra showed negligible choline content. For three posttreatment fibrosis cases, the choline concentration range was 0.2-0.4 mmol/kg. For the remaining 12 posttreatment fibrosis cases, the spectra showed negligible choline content. Average choline concentrations were different for malignant and benign lesions (2.7 vs 0.5 mmol/kg; p = 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The measurement of choline concentration within musculoskeletal lesions by MRS is feasible using an internal water-referencing method at 3 T and has potential for characterizing lesions for malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20566784      PMCID: PMC3035623          DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  24 in total

Review 1.  1H MR spectroscopy of the brain: absolute quantification of metabolites.

Authors:  Jacobus F A Jansen; Walter H Backes; Klaas Nicolay; M Eline Kooi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Quantitation of automated single-voxel proton MRS using cerebral water as an internal reference.

Authors:  B J Soher; R E Hurd; N Sailasuta; P B Barker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantification of muscle choline concentrations by proton MR spectroscopy at 3 T: technical feasibility.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Nouha Salibi; Xin Wang; Antonio J Machado; Michael A Jacobs; David A Bluemke; Peter B Barker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  1H chemical shift imaging reveals loss of brain tumor choline signal after administration of Gd-contrast.

Authors:  P E Sijens; M J van den Bent; P J Nowak; P van Dijk; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Musculoskeletal tumors: use of proton MR spectroscopic imaging for characterization.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; David A Bluemke; Edward F McCarthy; Kristin L Weber; Peter B Barker; Michael A Jacobs
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Quantitative correlation between (1)H MRS and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Hyeon-Man Baek; Hon J Yu; Jeon-Hor Chen; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.546

8.  Musculoskeletal tumors: follow-up with MR imaging after treatment with surgery and radiation therapy.

Authors:  D Vanel; M J Lacombe; D Couanet; C Kalifa; M Spielmann; J Genin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Longitudinally monitoring chemotherapy effect of malignant musculoskeletal tumors with in vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an initial experience.

Authors:  Tsyh-Jyi Hsieh; Chun-Wei Li; Hung-Yi Chuang; Gin-Chung Liu; Chien-Kuo Wang
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Java-based graphical user interface for the MRUI quantitation package.

Authors:  A Naressi; C Couturier; J M Devos; M Janssen; C Mangeat; R de Beer; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.533

View more
  12 in total

1.  The year in review: recent advances in musculoskeletal radiology and biology.

Authors:  Ravi S Kamath; Hugue A Ouellette
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Characterisation of musculoskeletal tumours by multivoxel proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Ruchi S Patni; Deb K Boruah; Shantiranjan Sanyal; Bidyut B Gogoi; Maninder Patni; Rosy Khandelia; Nripen Gogoi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Influence of calcium on choline measurements by 1H MR spectroscopy of thigh muscles.

Authors:  Pedro A Gondim Teixeira; Gabriela Hossu; François Kauffmann; Anou Sewonu; Jean-Marc Constans; Alain Blum; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of skeletal muscle: a comparison of two quantitation techniques.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Nouha Salibi; Laura M Fayad; Peter B Barker
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 5.  Proton MR spectroscopy in metabolic assessment of musculoskeletal lesions.

Authors:  Ty K Subhawong; Xin Wang; Daniel J Durand; Michael A Jacobs; John A Carrino; Antonio J Machado; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Therapeutic response in musculoskeletal soft tissue sarcomas: evaluation by MRI.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Michael A Jacobs; Laura Fayad
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.044

7.  Characterization of peripheral nerve sheath tumors with 3T proton MR spectroscopy.

Authors:  L M Fayad; X Wang; J O Blakeley; D J Durand; M A Jacobs; S Demehri; T K Subhawong; T Soldatos; P B Barker
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques.

Authors:  Laura M Fayad; Michael A Jacobs; Xin Wang; John A Carrino; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  3.0 T proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the liver: quantification of choline.

Authors:  Li Xu; Bo Liu; Yan Huang; Xian Liu; Si-Wei Zhang; Xue-Gang Xin; Jin-Zhi Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Schwannoma in neurofibromatosis type 1: a pitfall for detecting malignancy by metabolic imaging.

Authors:  Shivani Ahlawat; Jaishri Blakeley; Elizabeth Montgomery; Rathan M Subramaniam; Allan Belzberg; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.