Literature DB >> 23538615

Gauging interest of the general public in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis eye surgery.

Joshua D Stein1, David M Childers, Bin Nan, Shahzad I Mian.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess interest among members of the general public in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery and how levels of interest in this procedure have changed over time in the United States and other countries.
METHODS: Using the Google Trends Web site, we determined the weekly frequency of queries involving the term "LASIK" from January 1, 2007, through January 1, 2011, in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and India. We fit separate regression models for each of the countries to assess whether residents of these countries differed in their querying rates on specific dates and over time. Similar analyses were performed to compare 4 US states. Additional regression models compared general public interest in LASIK surgery before and after the release of a 2008 Food and Drug Administration report describing complaints associated with this procedure.
RESULTS: During 2007 to 2011, the Google query rate for "LASIK" was highest among persons residing in India, followed by the United Kingdom, Canada, and the United States. During this time period, the query rate declined by 40% in the United States, 24% in India, and 22% in the United Kingdom, and it increased by 8% in Canada. In all 4 of the US states examined, the query rate declined-by 52% in Florida, 56% in New York, 54% in Texas, and 42% in California. Interest in LASIK declined further among US citizens after the Food and Drug Administration report release.
CONCLUSIONS: Interest among the general public in LASIK surgery has been waning in recent years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23538615      PMCID: PMC3679260          DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318283c85a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  6 in total

1.  Web data predict flu.

Authors:  Declan Butler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Prevalence of refractive error in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Susan Vitale; Leon Ellwein; Mary Frances Cotch; Frederick L Ferris; Robert Sperduto
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08

Review 3.  Google trends: a web-based tool for real-time surveillance of disease outbreaks.

Authors:  Herman Anthony Carneiro; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Frequency and seasonal variation of ophthalmology-related internet searches.

Authors:  Christopher T Leffler; Byrd Davenport; Dana Chan
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.882

5.  Using search engine query data to track pharmaceutical utilization: a study of statins.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Schuster; Mary A M Rogers; Laurence F McMahon
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  More diseases tracked by using Google Trends.

Authors:  Camille Pelat; Clément Turbelin; Avner Bar-Hen; Antoine Flahault; Alain- Jacques Valleron
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.883

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  The use of google trends in health care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sudhakar V Nuti; Brian Wayda; Isuru Ranasinghe; Sisi Wang; Rachel P Dreyer; Serene I Chen; Karthik Murugiah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Amaryllis Mavragani; Gabriela Ochoa; Konstantinos P Tsagarakis
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Global monitoring of public interest in preventive measures against COVID-19 via analysis of Google Trends: an infodemiology and infoveillance study.

Authors:  Tomoo Ito
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 3.006

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.