Literature DB >> 23537735

Clinical evaluation of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system.

Ronald Brazg1, Kristen Hughes, Pamela Martin, Julie Coard, John Toffaletti, Elizabeth McDonnell, Elizabeth Taylor, Lausanne Farrell, Mona Patel, Jeanne Ward, Ting Chen, Shridhara Alva, Ronald Ng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A new version of international standard (ISO 15197) and CLSI Guideline (POCT12) with more stringent accuracy criteria are near publication. We evaluated the glucose test performance of the FreeStyle Precision Pro system, a new blood glucose monitoring system (BGMS) designed to enhance accuracy for point-of-care testing (POCT).
METHODS: Precision, interference and system accuracy with 503 blood samples from capillary, venous and arterial sources were evaluated in a multicenter study. Study results were analyzed and presented in accordance with the specifications and recommendations of the final draft ISO 15197 and the new POCT12.
RESULTS: The FreeStyle Precision Pro system demonstrated acceptable precision (CV <5%), no interference across a hematocrit range of 15-65%, and, except for xylose, no interference from 24 of 25 potentially interfering substances. It also met all accuracy criteria specified in the final draft ISO 15197 and POCT12, with 97.3-98.9% of the individual results of various blood sample types agreeing within ±12 mg/dl of the laboratory analyzer values at glucose concentrations <100mg/dl and within ±12.5% of the laboratory analyzer values at glucose concentrations ≥100 mg/dl.
CONCLUSIONS: The FreeStyle Precision Pro system met the tighter accuracy requirements, providing a means for enhancing accuracy for point-of-care blood glucose monitoring.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23537735     DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chim Acta        ISSN: 0009-8981            Impact factor:   3.786


  3 in total

Review 1.  Challenges of inpatient blood glucose monitoring: standards, methods, and devices to measure blood glucose.

Authors:  Kathie L Hermayer; Aundrea S Loftley; Sumana Reddy; Satya Nandana Narla; Nina A Epps; Yusheng Zhu
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Analysis of "Capillary and Venous Blood Glucose Accuracy in Blood Glucose Meters Versus Reference Standards: The Impact of Study Design on Accuracy Evaluations".

Authors:  Gary H Thorpe
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-15

3.  Is there a need to measure preand post-capillary blood glucose following a cardiac exercise class?

Authors:  Tim P Grove; Neil E Hill
Journal:  Br J Cardiol       Date:  2020-12-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.