Literature DB >> 23537417

Experiences of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes during delivery from four Italian centers: a retrospective observational study.

Raffaella Fresa1, Natalia Visalli, Vincenzo Di Blasi, Vincenzo Cavallaro, Egle Ansaldi, Oria Trifoglio, Santina Abbruzzese, Marzia Bongiovanni, Mariano Agrusta, Angela Napoli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: An optimized metabolic control during delivery is mandatory to prevent maternal-neonatal complications. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) during delivery in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. The secondary aim was to assess the impact of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) added to CSII versus CSII alone. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter observational retrospective study. A standardized protocol, to use CSII throughout pregnancy and delivery, foresaw three different insulin basal rates according to blood glucose level: profile A, the last basal rate in use; profile B, preventive 50% reduction of the last basal rate in use; and profile C, 0.1-0.2 U/h for blood glucose level <70 mg/dL, activated just before anesthesia or at the beginning of active labor. An alternative intravenous protocol (IVP) was given in case of complications and relevant metabolic deterioration. Blood glucose in the target range (70-140 mg/dL) throughout delivery and percentage of activation of the IVP were primary outcomes.
RESULTS: Sixty-five pregnant women with diabetes included in the study (56-86% cesarean section; 9-14% spontaneous/stimulated vaginal delivery). Mean blood glucose level was 102 ± 31 mg/dL at 0 min, 109 ± 42 mg/dL at 30 min, 120 ± 48 mg/dL at 60 min, and 99 ± 34 mg/dL at 24 h. Mean basal rate during delivery was 0.6 ± 0.4 U/h (profile B). Mean capillary blood glucose (CBG) level was lower in the RT-CGM group relative to the CSII-alone group: 80 ± 14 mg/dL versus 111 ± 32 mg/dL at 0 min (P<0.01), 79 ± 11 mg/dL versus 109 ± 42 mg/dL at 30 min (P<0.02), and 98 ± 20 mg/dL versus 125 ± 51 mg/dL at 60 min (difference not significant). Eleven newborns experienced transient neonatal hypoglycemia. None of the women switched to IVP. No major differences were observed according to delivery procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: CSII is possible and safe in different types of delivery in selected and educated women. RT-CGM helps to obtain better outcomes in terms of maternal peripartum CBG level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23537417     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2012.0260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  7 in total

1.  Safety of using real-time sensor glucose values for treatment decisions in adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study.

Authors:  Larry A Fox; Emilie Balkman; Kim Englert; Jobayer Hossain; Nelly Mauras
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.866

Review 2.  Inpatient management of women with gestational and pregestational diabetes in pregnancy.

Authors:  Etoi A Garrison; Shubhada Jagasia
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  CGM, Pregnancy, and Remote Monitoring.

Authors:  Sarit Polsky; Rachel Garcetti
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Adaptability of Closed Loop During Labor, Delivery, and Postpartum: A Secondary Analysis of Data from Two Randomized Crossover Trials in Type 1 Diabetes Pregnancy.

Authors:  Zoe A Stewart; Jennifer M Yamamoto; Malgorzata E Wilinska; Sarah Hartnell; Conor Farrington; Roman Hovorka; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  Diabetes in pregnancy: a new decade of challenges ahead.

Authors:  Ute Schaefer-Graf; Angela Napoli; Christopher J Nolan
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  CopenFast trial: Faster-acting insulin Fiasp versus insulin NovoRapid in the treatment of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes during pregnancy and lactation - a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sidse Kjærhus Nørgaard; Elisabeth Reinhardt Mathiesen; Kirsten Nørgaard; Tine Dalsgaard Clausen; Peter Damm; Lene Ringholm
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Emerging Technologies for the Management of Type 1 Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jennifer M Yamamoto; Helen R Murphy
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 4.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.