| Literature DB >> 23537200 |
Yuguang Zhang1, Zhenmei Lu, Shanshan Liu, Yunfeng Yang, Zhili He, Zuohua Ren, Jizhong Zhou, Diqiang Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: GeoChip 3.0, a microbial functional gene array, containing ~28,000 oligonucleotide probes and targeting ~57,000 sequences from 292 functional gene families, provided a powerful tool for researching microbial community structure in natural environments. The alpine meadow is a dominant plant community in the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau, hence it is important to profile the unique geographical flora and assess the response of the microbial communities to environmental variables. In this study, Geochip 3.0 was employed to understand the microbial functional gene diversity and structure, and metabolic potential and the major environmental factors in shaping microbial communities structure of alpine meadow soil in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23537200 PMCID: PMC3617080 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-72
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Microbiol ISSN: 1471-2180 Impact factor: 3.605
Location and geochemistry characteristics of the studied soil samples
| SJY-GH | 35°52.524′N, 99°56.758′E | 3400 m | 91.99 | 1.50 | 61.33 | 0.59 | 5.93 | 14.60 | 0.80 | 7.57 |
| SJY-DR | 33°34.586′N, 99°53.899′E | 4077 m | 93.74 | 3.10 | 30.24 | 0.62 | 6.15 | 33.50 | 0.90 | 6.09 |
| SJY-QML | 34°03.924′N, 95°49.240′E | 4126 m | 103.99 | 4.30 | 24.18 | 0.69 | 6.97 | 26.20 | 1.00 | 7.63 |
| SJY-CD | 33°38.200′N, 97°11.236′E | 4412 m | 146.25 | 7.90 | 18.51 | 1.28 | 8.63 | 40.70 | 2.10 | 6.65 |
| SJY-ZD | 33°18.194′N, 96°17.266′E | 4457 m | 107.06 | 4.90 | 21.85 | 0.75 | 7.78 | 40.40 | 2.20 | 6.72 |
| SJY-YS | 33°21.117′N, 96°14.802′E | 4813 m | 209.19 | 15.50 | 13.51 | 1.53 | 11.92 | 50.80 | 1.30 | 6.73 |
SOC total organic carbon, TN total nitrogen, C/N total organic carbon to total nitrogen ratio, P total phosphorus, K total potassium, AP available potassium, AK available phosphorus.
Total detected gene number, gene overlap, unique, diversity indices of soil sample
| SJY-GH | 2029(42.94%) | 1655(37.26%) | 1264(30.00%) | 1261(29.84%) | 1178(27.22%) | |
| SJY-DR | | 1485(38.33%) | 1171(32.81%) | 1163(32.43%) | 1107(30.24%) | |
| SJY-QML | | | 1049(34.57%) | 1062(35.05%) | 973(31.01%) | |
| SJY-CD | | | | 916(35.82%) | 840(31.67%) | |
| SJY-ZD | | | | | 816(30.39%) | |
| SJY-YS | | | | | | |
| 3746 | 3008 | 2351 | 1732 | 1741 | 1760 | |
| 8.22 | 8.01 | 7.76 | 7.45 | 7.46 | 7.47 | |
| 3716 | 2988 | 2340 | 1723 | 1733 | 1752 |
a Values in parentheses are percentages. Italicized values indicate the number of overlapping genes between samples, boldface values indicate the number of unique genes in each sample.
The detected gene probes number involving in carbon and nitrogen cycling
| Carbon fixation | 202 | 108 | 81 | 83 | 52 | 54 | 46 |
| Carbon degradation | 567 | 336 | 252 | 196 | 145 | 160 | 162 |
| Strarch | 161 | 91 | 66 | 54 | 39 | 45 | 43 |
| Cellulose | 63 | 41 | 24 | 23 | 16 | 14 | 22 |
| Hemicellulose | 105 | 61 | 55 | 38 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Lignin | 76 | 53 | 37 | 31 | 23 | 22 | 23 |
| Chitin | 90 | 49 | 36 | 24 | 20 | 34 | 23 |
| Pectin | 12 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Others | 60 | 34 | 28 | 21 | 20 | 16 | 21 |
| Methane production | 18 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 5 |
| Methane oxidation | 36 | 16 | 20 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 15 |
| Nitrogen fixation | 224 | 116 | 108 | 79 | 52 | 56 | 62 |
| Denitrification | 372 | 222 | 185 | 143 | 97 | 100 | 96 |
| Nitrification | 17 | 7 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 2 |
| Dissimilatory N reduction | 51 | 34 | 24 | 18 | 12 | 20 | 15 |
| Assimilatory N reduction | 27 | 11 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 9 |
| Anaerobic ammonium oxidation | 63 | 43 | 34 | 29 | 23 | 19 | 15 |
Figure 1Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) of Geochip hybridization signal intensities and soil environmental vairables significantly related to microbial community variations: altitude (A), the ratio of organic carbon and total nitrogen (C/N), pH and Soil organic carbon (C).
Figure 2Variation partitioning analysis of microbial diversity explained by sample altitude (A), soil geochemistry factors (S) and pH (p). (a) General outline, (b) all functional genes. Each diagram represents the biological variation partitioned into the relative effects of each factor or a combination of factors, in which geometric areas were proportional to the respenctive percentages of explained variation. The edges of the triangle presented the variation explained by each factor alone. The sides of the triangels presented interactions of any two factors, and the middle of the triangles represented interactions of all three factors.