| Literature DB >> 23536705 |
MacMillan Mbantenkhu1, Sara Wierzbicki, Xiaowen Wang, Shangdong Guo, Stephan Wilkens, Xin Jie Chen.
Abstract
Mgm101 is a Rad52-type single-stranded annealing protein (SSAP) required for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) repair and maintenance. Structurally, Mgm101 forms large oligomeric rings. Here we determine the function(s) of a 32-amino acid carboxyl-terminal tail (Mgm101(238-269)) conserved in the Mgm101 family of proteins. Mutagenic analysis shows that Lys-253, Trp-257, Arg-259, and Tyr-268 are essential for mtDNA maintenance. Mutations in Lys-251, Arg-252, Lys-260, and Tyr-266 affect mtDNA stability at 37°C and under oxidative stress. The Y268A mutation severely affects single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding without altering the ring structure. Mutations in the Lys-251-Arg-252-Lys-253 positive triad also affect ssDNA binding. Moreover, the C-tail alone is sufficient to mediate ssDNA binding. Finally, we find that the W257A and R259A mutations dramatically affect the conformation and oligomeric state of Mgm101. These structural alterations correlate with protein degradation in vivo. The data thus indicate that the C-tail of Mgm101, likely displayed on the ring surface, is required for ssDNA binding, higher-order structural organization, and protein stability. We speculate that an initial electrostatic and base-stacking interaction with ssDNA could remodel ring organization. This may facilitate the formation of nucleoprotein filaments competent for mtDNA repair. These findings could have broad implications for understanding how SSAPs promote DNA repair and genome maintenance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23536705 PMCID: PMC3655812 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E13-01-0006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Cell ISSN: 1059-1524 Impact factor: 4.138
FIGURE 1:The C-tail deletion destabilizes the oligomeric state of Mgm101. (A) Domain organization of SSAPs from various species. All SSAPs contain the conserved SSA domain (shown in gray). The Mgm101-specific C-tail is shown in blue. (B) Solid ribbon structure of Mgm101115-237 modeled on the N-terminal ssDNA-binding domain of human Rad52 (1H2I). The projected position of Tyr-139 is represented by scaled balls and sticks. (C) Surface representation model of an Mgm101 14-mer ring modeled on the crystal structure of the human Rad52 (1H2I). The red arrow indicates the putative ssDNA-binding groove predicted for Rad52. The black arrow indicates that Val237 is displayed on the surface of the ring, which is followed by the C-tail. (D) SDS–PAGE showing purified Mbp-Mgm101ΔC after amylose resin affinity chromatography (lane 2) compared with a wild-type fusion control (lane 1). (E) Size exclusion chromatography of MBP-Mgm101ΔC (pink) with corresponding fractions analyzed by Western blot as depicted. Wild-type fusion control (blue) is a monodisperse peak of ∼940 kDa, in contrast to the polydisperse MBP-Mgm101ΔC. Note that no signal is detected by Western blot for MBP-Mgm101ΔC present in the void volume, likely due to precipitation of the protein aggregates in the solution.
FIGURE 2:The effect of positively charged and aromatic amino acid C-tail mutants on mtDNA maintenance. (A) Sequence alignment of Mgm101 homologues from fungal species reveals highly conserved basic and aromatic residues. The 10 residues indicated at the top of the alignment represent the ones that are studied by alanine substitution. (B–D) Complementation of the mgm101-1 allele by mutant C-tail alleles. The mgm101-1 mutant was transformed with a centromeric vector expressing the C-tail alanine mutants. Ura+ transformants were serially diluted in water and tested for growth on YPGE at 30 and 35°C. (E) Frequency of petite colonies in the mgm101-1 mutant after transformation with mutant C-tail alleles. The mgm101–1 mutant was transformed with a centromeric vector expressing the C-tail alanine mutants. Ura+ transformants were plated on YPD medium and incubated at 35°C. Petite frequencies were scored as the ratio of white colonies to the total number of cells growing on that plate. The data are the averaged petite frequency of at least three independent transformants. Error bars indicate average deviations.
FIGURE 3:Complementation of an mgm101-null mutant by C-tail mutant alleles. (A) Meiotic analysis showing that mgm101, mgm101, mgm101, and mgm101 failed to complement the null mgm101Δ::kan allele for respiratory growth on ethanol plus glycerol medium at 30°C. A tetrad independently segregating the null mgm101Δ::kan and the mutant alanine alleles was dissected on complete glucose medium. The meiotic segregants were then replica plated onto G418, –Ura, and ethanol plus glycerol medium. G418R marks the presence of the null mgm101Δ::kan allele, and Ura+ marks the mutant alanine alleles. Failure to grow on YPGE indicates the lack of complementation by mutant alanine alleles and the loss of mtDNA. (B) Temperature- and H2O2-induced petite production in the C-tail mutants. Meiotic segregants expressing only the mgm101, mgm101, mgm101, and mgm101 showed significantly increased production of petite colonies when challenged with high temperature or increasing concentrations of H2O2. The haploid cells were first grown in ethanol plus glycerol medium at 30°C. Cells were then inoculated in liquid YPD medium for 24 h at 37 or at 30°C in the presence of 1 or 2 mM H2O2. After dilution in water, cells were plated on YPD and incubated at 30°C for 5 d. Petites were identified as white colonies, and the petite frequency was scored as the percentage of white vs. total number of colonies. The data presented are the averaged petite frequency of at least three independent experiments. Error bars indicate average deviations.
FIGURE 4:Chromatographic profile, oligomeric state and in vivo stability of mutant Mgm101. (A) Size exclusion chromatography of purified MBP-Mgm101 and its mutant variants on a calibrated Superose 6 column. V0, void volume. (B) Size exclusion chromatography of purified Mgm101 and its C-tail variants. (C) Size exclusion chromatography of Mgm101W257A on a Superose 6 column before and immediately after the release from MBP (red line). Inset shows SDS–PAGE analysis of peaks 1 and 2, which contain MBP and Mgm101, respectively. (D) Western blot analysis showing the levels of the mutant Mgm101 in isolated mitochondria. The mitochondrial outer membrane protein porin is used as a control for calibrating sample loading.
FIGURE 5:Oligomeric state of mutant Mgm101. (A) Negative-stain transmission electron microscopy showing the ring structure of mutant Mgm101. (B) Blue-native gel electrophoresis of Mgm101 (WT) and Mgm101W257A (W257A).
FIGURE 6:ssDNA-binding affinity of Mgm101 C-tail variants. (A) Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showing the ssDNA-binding activity of Mgm101 C-tail variants. (B) Graphic representation of the results from A. Error bars, average deviations of three independent experiments for respective C-tail variants. (C) Schematics showing the fusion of the Mgm101 C-tail with MBP. (D) SDS–PAGE showing the purification of the Mgm101 C-tail fused with MBP (MBP-C). (E) DNA-binding activity of MBP-C in comparison with the fusion of the full-length Mgm101 with MBP (MBP-Mgm101). DNA binding was performed in the absence of Mg2+ and in the presence of 2 mM EDTA.
FIGURE 7:Mgm101Y139A is functionally defective in vivo but competent in ssDNA binding in vitro. (A) Sequence alignment of Mgm101 with human Rad52. Shown in the Mgm101 functional core is Y139, which is equivalent to Y47 in yRad52 (yeast), Y65 in hRad52 (humans), and Y42 in Sak (lactococcal ul36). (B) Meiotic analysis showing that the mgm101 is unable to complement the mgm101Δ::kan allele for growth on complete medium containing glycerol and ethanol (Gly+EtOH) as carbon sources. Four complete tetrads are shown, in which the segregants cosegregating mgm101Δ::kan (G418R) and the mgm101 allele (Ura+) are circled. (C) Size exclusion chromatography of purified Mgm101Y139A on a Superose 6 column showing that the mutant variant coelutes with the wild-type protein. (D) ssDNA-binding activity of Mgm101Y139A compared with wild type. Error bars, average deviations of three independent experiments.
Genotypes and sources of yeast strains used in this study.
| Strain name | Genotype | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Haploid | ||
| M2915-6A | This laboratory | |
| M2915-7C | Chen | |
| W303-1B | R. Rothstein (Columbia University) | |
| W303-1B/A | R. Rothstein (Columbia University) | |
| MM3/2-2B | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM4/1-2D | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM5/2-1C | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM6/1-2B | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM7/2-4C | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM8/4-4B | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM9/1-6D | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM10/1-4C | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM11/2-2D | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM12/2-6D | W303 background, | |
| This study | ||
| MM13/1-1D | W303 background, mgm101Δ::kan, | |
| This study | ||
| Diploid | ||
| W303/a/α | ||
| R. Rothstein (Columbia University) | ||
| CS1638/1 | As W303/a/α, but | This study |
| MM3/2 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM4/1 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM5/2 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM6/1 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM7 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM8/4 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM9/1 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM10/1 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM11/2 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM12/2 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |
| MM13/1 | As CS1638/1, | |
| but | This study | |
| MM14/1 | As CS1638/1, but | This study |