Literature DB >> 23536442

Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face.

F R Moore1, V Coetzee, J Contreras-Garduño, L M Debruine, K Kleisner, I Krams, U Marcinkowska, A Nord, D I Perrett, M J Rantala, N Schaum, T N Suzuki.   

Abstract

Women in the UK prefer the faces of men with low levels of the stress hormone cortisol, and the relationship is moderated by the sex hormone testosterone. In a Latvian sample, however, women's preferences were not affected by cortisol, and the interaction with testosterone differed from that of the UK. To further explore cross-cultural variation in preferences for facial cues to sex- and stress-hormones, we tested the preferences of women from 13 countries for facial composites constructed to differ in combinations of the hormones. We found significant relationships between a measure of societal development (the United Nations human development index 2011) and preferences for cues to testosterone in the face, and the interaction between preferences for cues to testosterone and cortisol. We also found a significant relationship between preferences for cues to testosterone and a societal-level measure of parasite stress. We conclude that societal-level ecological factors influence the relative value of traits revealed by combinations of sex- and stress-hormones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536442      PMCID: PMC3645036          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  10 in total

1.  Stress and the evolution of condition-dependent signals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Extending parasite-stress theory to variation in human mate preferences.

Authors:  Lisa M DeBruine; Anthony C Little; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 12.579

3.  National income inequality predicts women's preferences for masculinized faces better than health does.

Authors:  Robert Brooks; Isabel M Scott; Alexei A Maklakov; Michael M Kasumovic; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: the cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity.

Authors:  Corey L Fincher; Randy Thornhill
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Stress and immunity in wild vertebrates: timing is everything.

Authors:  Lynn B Martin
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 2.822

6.  Cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the human male face: functions of glucocorticoids in the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis.

Authors:  F R Moore; E A S Al Dujaili; R E Cornwell; M J Law Smith; J F Lawson; M Sharp; D I Perrett
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.587

7.  Hormones, handicaps and bright birds.

Authors:  A Pape Møller
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in human male faces.

Authors:  F R Moore; R E Cornwell; M J Law Smith; E A S Al Dujaili; M Sharp; D I Perrett
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evidence for the stress-linked immunocompetence handicap hypothesis in humans.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Fhionna R Moore; Ilona Skrinda; Tatjana Krama; Inese Kivleniece; Sanita Kecko; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Physiological stress mediates the honesty of social signals.

Authors:  Gary R Bortolotti; Francois Mougeot; Jesus Martinez-Padilla; Lucy M I Webster; Stuart B Piertney
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total
  10 in total

1.  What can cross-cultural correlations teach us about human nature?

Authors:  Thomas V Pollet; Joshua M Tybur; Willem E Frankenhuis; Ian J Rickard
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2014-09

2.  Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces.

Authors:  Urszula M Marcinkowska; Mikhail V Kozlov; Huajian Cai; Jorge Contreras-Garduño; Barnaby J Dixson; Gavita A Oana; Gwenaël Kaminski; Norman P Li; Minna T Lyons; Ike E Onyishi; Keshav Prasai; Farid Pazhoohi; Pavol Prokop; Sandra L Rosales Cardozo; Nicolle Sydney; Jose C Yong; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Body height, immunity, facial and vocal attractiveness in young men.

Authors:  Ilona Skrinda; Tatjana Krama; Sanita Kecko; Fhionna R Moore; Ants Kaasik; Laila Meija; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Markus J Rantala; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2014-10-18

4.  Facial appearance reveals immunity in African men.

Authors:  Khutso G Phalane; Catherine Tribe; Helen C Steel; Moloko C Cholo; Vinet Coetzee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?

Authors:  Toneya L McIntosh; Anthony J Lee; Morgan J Sidari; Rebecca E Stower; James M Sherlock; Barnaby J W Dixson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Concern About Contracting COVID-19 Predicts Men's Preference for Female Facial Femininity, But Not Women's Preference for Male Facial Masculinity.

Authors:  Farid Pazhoohi; Sepide Pazhouhi; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  The influence of the digital divide on face preferences in El Salvador: people without internet access prefer more feminine men, more masculine women, and women with higher adiposity.

Authors:  Carlota Batres; David I Perrett
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Body height affects the strength of immune response in young men, but not young women.

Authors:  Indrikis A Krams; Ilona Skrinda; Sanita Kecko; Fhionna R Moore; Tatjana Krama; Ants Kaasik; Laila Meija; Vilnis Lietuvietis; Markus J Rantala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Perceived attractiveness of Czech faces across 10 cultures: Associations with sexual shape dimorphism, averageness, fluctuating asymmetry, and eye color.

Authors:  Tomáš Kočnar; S Adil Saribay; Karel Kleisner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feeling Stressed and Ugly? Leave the City and Visit Nature! An Experiment on Self-and Other-Perceived Stress and Attractiveness Levels.

Authors:  Claudia Menzel; Fiona Dennenmoser; Gerhard Reese
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.