Literature DB >> 21672543

Cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the human male face: functions of glucocorticoids in the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis.

F R Moore1, E A S Al Dujaili, R E Cornwell, M J Law Smith, J F Lawson, M Sharp, D I Perrett.   

Abstract

The stress-linked version of the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis has been proposed to account for inconsistencies in relationships between testosterone and immune response. The model has received some support from studies demonstrating roles of stress hormones in relationships between testosterone, immune function and secondary sexual ornamentation. Such work, however, has relied on artificial elevation of testosterone so may not reflect relationships in natural populations. We created human male facial stimuli on the basis of naturally co-occurring levels of salivary testosterone and the stress hormone cortisol. In Study 1 we tested female preferences for male faces with cues to combinations of the hormones across the menstrual cycle, and in Study 2 we tested perceptions of health and dominance in a novel set of facial stimuli. Females preferred cues to low cortisol, a preference that was strongest during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. The effects of cortisol on attractiveness and perceived health and dominance were contingent upon level of testosterone: the effects of the stress hormone were reduced when testosterone was high. We propose explanations for our results, including low cortisol as a cue to a heritable component of health, attractiveness as a predictor of low social-evaluative threat (and, therefore, low baseline cortisol) and testosterone as a proxy of male ability to cope efficiently with stressors.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672543     DOI: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2011.05.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  6 in total

1.  Cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for cues to sex- and stress-hormones in the male face.

Authors:  F R Moore; V Coetzee; J Contreras-Garduño; L M Debruine; K Kleisner; I Krams; U Marcinkowska; A Nord; D I Perrett; M J Rantala; N Schaum; T N Suzuki
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Facial attractiveness is related to women's cortisol and body fat, but not with immune responsiveness.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Vinet Coetzee; Fhionna R Moore; Ilona Skrinda; Sanita Kecko; Tatjana Krama; Inese Kivleniece; Indrikis Krams
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Physiological roles of glucocorticoids during early embryonic development of the zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Authors:  K S Wilson; G Matrone; D E W Livingstone; E A S Al-Dujaili; J J Mullins; C S Tucker; P W F Hadoke; C J Kenyon; M A Denvir
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Patterns of correlation of facial shape with physiological measurements are more integrated than patterns of correlation with ratings.

Authors:  S Windhager; F L Bookstein; E Millesi; B Wallner; K Schaefer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Does the Interaction Between Cortisol and Testosterone Predict Men's Facial Attractiveness?

Authors:  Michal Kandrik; Amanda C Hahn; Chengyang Han; Joanna Wincenciak; Claire I Fisher; Lisa M DeBruine; Benedict C Jones
Journal:  Adapt Human Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-03-30

6.  Women's self-rated attraction to male faces does not correspond with physiological arousal.

Authors:  S Hagerman; Z Woolard; K Anderson; B W Tatler; F R Moore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.