| Literature DB >> 23535338 |
Svetlana A Murzina1, Zinaida A Nefedova, Stig Falk-Petersen, Pauli O Ripatti, Tatiana R Ruokolainen, Svetlana N Pekkoeva, Nina N Nemova.
Abstract
A comparative study of the lipid status (i.e., the total lipid and phospholipid concentrations and the percentage of fatty acids of the total lipids) of adult specimens of daubed shanny (Leptoclinus maculatus) from Svalbard waters (Isfjord) and slender eel blenny (Lumpenus fabricii) from the White Sea (Onega Bay and Tersky shore) was performed to study the metabolism and functions of lipids of these fishes in ontogeny and under various ecological conditions. Slender eel blenny from both areas of the White Sea were distinguished by a high level of sphingomyelin compared with the daubed shanny from Svalbard, and the amount of total phospholipids was higher in slender eel blenny from Onega Bay than in slender eel blenny from the Tersky shore. The extent of saturation and the signature of polyenic fatty acids varied according to the specific species of the Stichaeidae family under study. These results demonstrate the differences in the trophoecological and hydrobiological conditions of habitations of these species and highlighted the importance of considering certain trends in the lipid profiles of these fishes as specific features of the organization of the ecological and biochemical mechanisms of adaptation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23535338 PMCID: PMC3645676 DOI: 10.3390/ijms14047048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Total lipids, triacylglycerols, wax esters, cholesterol esters, cholesterol, total phospholipids and separate phospholipids (% dry weight [dw]) in flesh of Leptoclinus maculatus from Svalbard (Isfjord) and Lumpenus fabricii from the White Sea (Onega Bay and Tersky Shore).
| Parameter/Species, Area | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 21 | 14 | |
| TL | 11.6 ± 1.3 | 11.4 ± 0.5 | 11.7 ± 1.4 |
| TAG | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 5.8 ± 0.3 | 2.5 ± 0.5 |
| WE + CE | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.0 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| CH | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 0.9 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.4 |
| PL | 4.7 ± 0.9 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 0.9 |
| PI | 0.08 ± 0.0 | 0.03 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 |
| PS | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.04 ± 0.0 | 0.1 ± 0.0 |
| PEA | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.4 ± 0.02 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| PC | 3.5 ± 0.6 | 2.4 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.7 |
| LPC | 0.05 ± 0.0 | 0.9 ± 0.0 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| SFM | 0.03 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.0 |
| Unknown | 0.1 ± 0.0 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.0 |
Data are means: M ± m; TAG: triacylglycerols; WE + CE: wax esters plus cholesterol esters; CH: cholesterol; PL: phospholipids; PC: phosphatidylcholine; PEA: phosphatidylethanolamine; PI: phosphatidylinositol; PS: phosphatidylserine; SFM: sphingomyelin; LPC: lysophosphatidylcholine. Values in the same row with the different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) among fishes from different areas:
from fishes from Svalbard;
from fishes from Tersky Shore of the White Sea;
from fishes from Onega Bay of the White Sea.
Fatty acid (FA) spectrum (% of total FA) in flesh of Leptoclinus maculatus from Svalbard (Isfjord) and Lumpenus fabricii from the White Sea (Onega Bay and Tersky Shore).
| FA/species, areas | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 14:0 | 2.28 ± 0.52 | 2.95 ± 0.09 | 3.77 ± 0.26 |
| 16:0 | 15.71 ± 0.61 | 15.17 ± 0.21 | 15.00 ± 1.92 |
| 18:0 | 4.50 ± 0.19 | 6.45 ± 0.24 | 3.50 ± 0.16 |
| ∑ SFA | 25.35 ± 1.10 | 27.34 ± 0.39 | 24.98 ± 2.29 |
| 16:1(n-7) | 11.02 ± 1.30 | 9.43 ± 0.32 | 9.37 ± 0.79 |
| 18:1(n-9) | 12.45 ± 1.08 | 11.04 ± 0.43 | 12.69 ± 2.81 |
| 18:1(n-7) | 6.32 ± 0.26 | 7.68 ± 0.19 | 5.70 ± 0.87 |
| 20:1(n-9) | 2.12 ± 0.71 | 2.02 ± 0.09 | 2.82 ± 1.15 |
| 20:1(n-7) | 3.35 ± 0.67 | 2.10 ± 0.13 | 1.72 ± 0.53 |
| 22:1(n-11) | 1.91 ± 1.23 | 0.60 ± 0.08 | 1.43 ± 0.81 |
| ∑ MUFA | 42.70 ± 4.09 | 38.77 ± 0.72 | 40.34 ± 1.90 |
| 18:2(n-6) | 0.55 ± 0.02 | 1.11 ± 0.04 | 1.06 ± 0.07 |
| 18:3(n-6) | 0.41 ± 0.13 | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.05 |
| 20:4(n-6) | 2.07 ± 0.36 | 3.34 ± 0.15 | 2.83 ± 0.83 |
| ∑ (n-6)FA | 4.65 ± 0.51 | 7.31 ± 0.18 | 6.38 ± 1.31 |
| 18:3(n-3) | 0.42 ± 0.05 | 0.41 ± 0.02 | 0.55 ± 0.17 |
| 20:5(n-3) | 13.94 ± 1.69 | 11.15 ± 0.37 | 11.53 ± 0.87 |
| 22:5(n-3) | 2.79 ± 0.24 | 1.63 ± 0.05 | 1.38 ± 0.29 |
| 22:6(n-3) | 8.36 ± 1.31 | 8.11 ± 0.28 | 9.32 ± 0.91 |
| ∑ (n-3)FA | 26.21 ± 3.01 | 23.62 ± 0.06 | 25.19 ± 0.54 |
| ∑ PUFA | 26.21 ± 3.01 | 33.89 ± 0.68 | 34.66 ± 0.82 |
| ∑ (n-6)/∑ (n-3) | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.05 |
| 18:3(n-3)/18:2(n-6) | 0.77 ± 0.08 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.56 ± 0.22 |
| 16:0/18:1(n-9) | 1.26 ± 0.16 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.09 |
Data are M ± m. Abbreviation: n: number of samples; FA: fatty acids; SFA: saturated fatty acids; MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids. Values in the same row with the different letters are significantly different (p ≤ 0.05) among fishes from different areas:
from fishes from Svalbard;
from fishes from Tersky Shore of the White Sea;
from fishes from Onega Bay of the White Sea.
Some characteristics of the sampling areas.
| Sampling area | Isfjord, svalbard | Tersky shore of the white sea | Onega bay of the white sea |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coordinates | 78°39′ | 66°05′ | 64°59′ |
| Depth, m | 206 | 38 | 38 |
| Temperature, °C | 0 | 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Salinity, ‰ | 35.0 | 27.0 | 26.4 |