BACKGROUND: Persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have increased rates of coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative contribution of genetic background, HIV-related factors, antiretroviral medications, and traditional risk factors to CAD has not been fully evaluated in the setting of HIV infection. METHODS: In the general population, 23 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were shown to be associated with CAD through genome-wide association analysis. Using the Metabochip, we genotyped 1875 HIV-positive, white individuals enrolled in 24 HIV observational studies, including 571 participants with a first CAD event during the 9-year study period and 1304 controls matched on sex and cohort. RESULTS: A genetic risk score built from 23 CAD-associated SNPs contributed significantly to CAD (P = 2.9 × 10(-4)). In the final multivariable model, participants with an unfavorable genetic background (top genetic score quartile) had a CAD odds ratio (OR) of 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.04). This effect was similar to hypertension (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.73), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96), diabetes (OR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.10-2.49), ≥ 1 year lopinavir exposure (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.73), and current abacavir treatment (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.07). The effect of the genetic risk score was additive to the effect of nongenetic CAD risk factors, and did not change after adjustment for family history of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of HIV infection, the effect of an unfavorable genetic background was similar to traditional CAD risk factors and certain adverse antiretroviral exposures. Genetic testing may provide prognostic information complementary to family history of CAD.
BACKGROUND:Persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have increased rates of coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative contribution of genetic background, HIV-related factors, antiretroviral medications, and traditional risk factors to CAD has not been fully evaluated in the setting of HIV infection. METHODS: In the general population, 23 common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were shown to be associated with CAD through genome-wide association analysis. Using the Metabochip, we genotyped 1875 HIV-positive, white individuals enrolled in 24 HIV observational studies, including 571 participants with a first CAD event during the 9-year study period and 1304 controls matched on sex and cohort. RESULTS: A genetic risk score built from 23 CAD-associated SNPs contributed significantly to CAD (P = 2.9 × 10(-4)). In the final multivariable model, participants with an unfavorable genetic background (top genetic score quartile) had a CAD odds ratio (OR) of 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-2.04). This effect was similar to hypertension (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.73), hypercholesterolemia (OR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96), diabetes (OR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.10-2.49), ≥ 1 year lopinavir exposure (OR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.06-1.73), and current abacavir treatment (OR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.17-2.07). The effect of the genetic risk score was additive to the effect of nongenetic CAD risk factors, and did not change after adjustment for family history of CAD. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of HIV infection, the effect of an unfavorable genetic background was similar to traditional CAD risk factors and certain adverse antiretroviral exposures. Genetic testing may provide prognostic information complementary to family history of CAD.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV infection; antiretroviral therapy; coronary artery disease; genetics; traditional risk factors
Authors: D Périard; A Telenti; P Sudre; J J Cheseaux; P Halfon; M J Reymond; S M Marcovina; M P Glauser; P Nicod; R Darioli; V Mooser Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-08-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Saul Genuth; K G M M Alberti; Peter Bennett; John Buse; Ralph Defronzo; Richard Kahn; John Kitzmiller; William C Knowler; Harold Lebovitz; Ake Lernmark; David Nathan; Jerry Palmer; Robert Rizza; Christopher Saudek; Jonathan Shaw; Michael Steffes; Michael Stern; Jaako Tuomilehto; Paul Zimmet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Joanne M Murabito; Michael J Pencina; Byung-Ho Nam; Ralph B D'Agostino; Thomas J Wang; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Peter W F Wilson; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-12-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A d'Arminio; C A Sabin; A N Phillips; P Reiss; R Weber; O Kirk; W El-Sadr; S De Wit; S Mateu; K Petoumenos; F Dabis; C Pradier; L Morfeldt; J D Lundgren; N Friis-Møller Journal: AIDS Date: 2004-09-03 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Byung-Ho Nam; Ralph B D'Agostino; Daniel Levy; Joanne M Murabito; Thomas J Wang; Peter W F Wilson; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-05-12 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sharon A Riddler; Ellen Smit; Stephen R Cole; Rui Li; Joan S Chmiel; Adrian Dobs; Frank Palella; Barbara Visscher; Rhobert Evans; Lawrence A Kingsley Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Daniel A Duprez; Jacqueline Neuhaus; Lewis H Kuller; Russell Tracy; Waldo Belloso; Stephane De Wit; Fraser Drummond; H Clifford Lane; Bruno Ledergerber; Jens Lundgren; Daniel Nixon; Nicholas I Paton; Ronald J Prineas; James D Neaton Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-09-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tanvi S Sharma; Gabriel Somarriba; Kristopher L Arheart; Daniela Neri; M Sunil Mathew; Patricia L Graham; Gwendolyn B Scott; Tracie L Miller Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 2.129