Literature DB >> 23532371

No difference in mortality between cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis for elderly patients with cervical hip fracture. A prospective randomized study on 334 patients over 75 years.

O Talsnes1, F Hjelmstedt, A H Pripp, O Reikerås, O E Dahl.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laboratory and human mechanical studies indicated that chemical substances in bone cement had toxic and prothrombotic effects. Impaction of cement added a mechanical trauma to the reaming and broaching procedure and contributed to a substantial local and systemic thrombin generation. Case reports and materials have indicated bone cement as the immediate trigger of cardiorespiratory and vascular dysfunction, occasionally fatal, and described as the bone cement implantation syndrome. In spite of this knowledge, bone cement has gained popularity and is widely used for prosthesis fixation, possibly due to a lack of clinical evidence supporting the basic science indicating bone cement as a mortality risk factor.
METHOD: This is a prospective, randomized study comparing cemented and non cemented hemiprosthesis on patients suffering a dislocated cervical hip fracture. Perioperative characteristics and 1 year mortality differences between the groups were estimated. PATIENTS: Hundred and thirty-four patients over 75 years were enrolled from two hospitals in Norway. Average age was 84 years, 75 % were female and 60 % had symptomatic comorbidities.
RESULTS: We find no difference in mortality between cemented and uncemented hemiprosthesis up to 1 year (HR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.51-1.18, p = 0.233). However, statistically significant reduced operation time and blood loss were found in the non-cemented group. (mean difference of 13 min, 95 % CI 4-22, p = 0.004 and 92 ml 95 % CI 3-181, p = 0.043, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Installation of non-cemented hemiprostheses in elderly with hip fracture may have benefits perioperatively regarding operation time and bleeding, and do not seem to influence 1 year mortality relative to cemented implants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23532371     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-013-1726-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  16 in total

1.  Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip in patients with a femoral neck fracture: a comparison of two modern stem design implants.

Authors:  M R M Frenken; M G M Schotanus; E H van Haaren; R Hendrickx
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-04-16

2.  Does the Risk of Death Within 48 Hours of Hip Hemiarthroplasty Differ Between Patients Treated with Cemented and Cementless Implants? A Meta-analysis of Large, National Registries.

Authors:  Ola E Dahl; Are Hugo Pripp
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 3.  Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Jamie Stokes; Jonathan A Cook; William Gp Eardley; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 4.  Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.

Authors:  Sharon R Lewis; Richard Macey; Martyn J Parker; Jonathan A Cook; Xavier L Griffin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-02-14

Review 5.  [Endoprostheses in the elderly : Biomaterials, implant selection and fixation technique].

Authors:  M M Morlock; M Jäger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  [Research progress in treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly].

Authors:  Yangyang Zhou; Yingjie Ni; Xingjuan Li; Hui Chen; Yunfeng Rui
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-15

7.  Hemiarthroplasty for a displaced femoral neck fracture: with or without bone cement?

Authors:  Hidde D Veldman; Ide C Heyligers; Bernd P Grimm; Tim A E J Boymans
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-06-10

8.  Cemented or uncemented hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures?

Authors:  Tero Yli-Kyyny; Reijo Sund; Mikko Heinänen; Petri Venesmaa; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 9.  Cemented versus cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  Ahmed Fikry Elmenshawy; Khaled Hamed Salem
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

10.  Does Proximal Femoral Morphology Impact Morbidity and Mortality? A Cohort Study of Uncemented Hemiarthroplasties in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures.

Authors:  Evelyn P Murphy; Christopher Fenelon; Adrian Cassar-Gheiti; Padhraig O'Loughlin; William Curtin; Colin G Murphy
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.